Chat Back 960 Thread 3 (what you expected some other title?)

Dreamlander Wrote:They let her have a microphone! She said she was called Amy,another one!,and yes she does seem more lively than some others!

Dreamlander

Its the Amy Channel... All Amy all the time Cheers anyway I can now tag my still's...

Hello.....Hello.....is there anybody THERE.....there.....there? I guess this is the opposite of the April effect.

Even the insomniacs are asleep Zzzzzz....

I went away but have returned with Pictures of Amy of the Night...


April Effect = Warm Fuzzy Feeling everybody felt when April appeared on the forums earlier tonight.

Honest man, I'm still failing to see the point in the three, yes! THREE! threads that have been created for this garbage they call a TV show. They don't have mics, they don't take their clothes off and the majority of the girls look like robots! It's insane I tell you!!!! I suppose I can concede that the hot blonde April is worth a look but still guys.... come on.

Oh dear.

I had such high hopes for 'Amy2'. I think she's every bit as attractive as April (actually more so but I don't want David R hunting me down with a flaming torch!).

At the beginning of the evening she was full of beans and seemed raring to go. However, we're heading towards midnight and she's hardly changed position, or revealed a hint of flesh.

This is where the channel falls down - there's no consistency. It mustn't be left up to the model as to what they show, it must be a channel decision. If April can strip down to her pants and prance around then obviously it's allowed, therefore other models must do the same thing.

It's not about budget, it's about proper production - hiring the right girls for the job and directing them to deliver. This just doesn't happen at the moment.

I'd love to hear from our resident Chatback producer Superspurs - can he please explain this lack of consistent standard in what we're being offered? Admittedly Roxy last night got her boobs out but to be frank her performance was sleep inducing. This was another experienced and lively model (as proven when she was on Hotel Voyeur) reduced to a corpse-like performance.

Is there perhaps a fault in the air-con at Chatback? That might explain the lacklustre performances - perhaps the models are oxygen deprived!

Digital Dave Wrote:I had such high hopes for 'Amy2'. I think she's every bit as attractive as April (actually more so but I don't want David R hunting me down with a flaming torch!).

I am a Defender of April but each to their own, everyone has their own personal taste in what they find attractive in another person and I find April interesting for other reasons other than just being HOT... *Apologies in advance if April comes hunting Digital Dave down with a flaming torch instead j/k *

datalossfs Wrote:Apologies in advance if April comes hunting Digital Dave down with a flaming torch instead j/k *

If this were to happen I'm sure I'd cope!

My address is ...

Digital Dave Wrote:

datalossfs Wrote:Apologies in advance if April comes hunting Digital Dave down with a flaming torch instead j/k *

If this were to happen I'm sure I'd cope!

My address is ...

*Pictures Digital Dave with Chair and Bull Whip in hand to defend himself "Back Woman Back... What am I saying... I give in..."

LMAO!

datalossfs Wrote:*Pictures Digital Dave with Chair and Bull Whip in hand to defend himself "Back Woman Back... What am I saying... I give in..."

LMAO!

Hehe! I suspect the time delay between "Back woman back" and "I give in" would be so short as to be unmeasurable on an atomic clock!

Hang on - just checked and Amy's moving about - excellent!