SirAssAlot
Ban All Ass Lickers!!!!
Posts: 4,228
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 237
|
RE: Naked Question?
(06-01-2010 15:55 )MARCCE Wrote: (06-01-2010 14:24 )Tintin Wrote: (06-01-2010 13:14 )MARCCE Wrote: Fact is, you don't like it because it takes away the interminably dull ass to camera for 10 minutes at a time routines.
WooW did you think of that all by your self?
As for the 10 minutes at a time routines don't make me laugh cause the girls are more nude on the show than they are wearing panties....
Yes, that's the way it is now, though it has to be said they're not always nude. Alexa doesn't do it at all, Delta doesn't always do it, Gemma doesn't always....the list goes on.
What you want is to have all the girls primed and ready to leap up and thrust their arses at the camera on command. Never mind the fact that you get that on just about every other channel bar the times when Elite and Babestation do go naked. And never mind the fact that half the time they're in that position, they'll be examining their nails, playing with their hair, reading the paper or writing out the following day's shopping list, you seem to want that to the exclusion of anything else. You objected to the girls standing up for the same reason.
All I'll say is that since they started going naked, there's been some of the hottest stuff I've seen on these channels since the days of Babestar.
For certain people to then say, "stop, we want you to go back to doing exactly what all the other channels are doing" kind of mystifies me.
And maybe if you could think of another position all by yourself, you'd get a bit more enjoyment and learn to embrace a bit more variety from the channels.
(Alexa doesn't do it at all, Delta doesn't always do it, Gemma) Agreed Alexa doesn't but Delta’s been doing it a lot Plus Gemma's done it a few time.
If you read through this thread you'll see i'm not the only 1 that's fed up / bored with the naked ness so stop trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill
Why members post content that's not shown to the public is beyond me.
Because of certain posts they’ve now blacked out the cams or moved them out of the way so we can’t see anything. Thanks guys you really know how to screw things up for the rest of us...
Over my 6 years of being a forum member I've never seen anything so stupid...
(This post was last modified: 06-01-2010 22:04 by SirAssAlot.)
|
|
06-01-2010 16:34 |
|
StanTheMan
Banned
Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
|
RE: Naked Question?
Look, if the girls started wearing giant, silky knickers that spread half way down their thighs and high on the belly everyone would be complaining, but that's exactly what we get when they drape these bloody blankets between their legs.
Fact: there's more chance of slips, cameltoes, stubble, etc when they're wearing little knickers than there is when they have their pussies wrapped in a fucking duvet.
|
|
07-01-2010 19:00 |
|
MARCCE
Senior Poster
Posts: 481
Joined: Oct 2008
Reputation: 26
|
RE: Naked Question?
(07-01-2010 19:00 )StanTheMan Wrote: Look, if the girls started wearing giant, silky knickers that spread half way down their thighs and high on the belly everyone would be complaining, but that's exactly what we get when they drape these bloody blankets between their legs.
Fact: there's more chance of slips, cameltoes, stubble, etc when they're wearing little knickers than there is when they have their pussies wrapped in a fucking duvet.
See, I'm not getting this at all. The sheets are often not used at all and when they are, they are often used in a barely covering anything kind of way.
If it was the kind of "safe nudity" you see on Hotel Voyeur and Babeworld where they pull the knickers down and then just lay face down then I'd agree but Elite, and indeed Babestation, aren't like that at all.
And Tintin, you miss the point. Yes Delta does do it and so does Gemma but it's not every section, every night and everytime they're on. Therefore, there's times when they'll appeal to you and times they'll appeal to me. Just the way it should be. Not this uniform stick ass to the camera you seem to want.
At around 11.00 last night I counted 9 of the girls across all channels doing that very pose and you don't think that's boring?
And don't take this the wrong way but I get a picture of your calls to the channels consisting of nothing more than a series of "ass to cams" all said in a Andy from Little Britain style voice.
|
|
07-01-2010 21:02 |
|
StanTheMan
Banned
Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
|
RE: Naked Question?
Well you two seem to be having your own little affair, so I'll leave you to it, but I'll just add another point of view - one that I hope sums up my dislike of the 'nudity' trend better than my last did.
The girls are not allowed to show genitalia, so the channels are trying to get round this and bring some excitement to proceedings by saying, "Oh, look! Our girls get completeley naked." Once naked, the girls have three options: lying on their fronts (Hotel Voyeur); bent in the doggy position, but side-on to camera (Babestation); or laid in any position they want, just as long as they have blankets covering their bits (Elite). The result being that we actually see less and get 'safer' performances than we do when they keep their knickers on.
So I ask again. What's the point?
(This post was last modified: 07-01-2010 22:56 by StanTheMan.)
|
|
07-01-2010 22:52 |
|