mikeybhoy73
Spikeyboy63
Posts: 179
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 15
|
Opinion of the SKY channels???
Hey guys, hope you're all well.....I'm just gonna get this off my chest and that's it okay.
I've been a member here on Babechannels from the start and it's one of THE best chat rooms around okay.....
.......So since Christmas I've been in the process of moving home, which has meant no access to SKY for a few weeks, which has made all the clips and pics on here from you guys all the more worthwhile (and many thanks for it!!!).
Now, last Friday I got my overly anticipated SKY+ installed at my new house and couldn't wait to catch up with all the nightly fun I've been missing for so long........until I started watching......and noticed that it is all gradually going backwards.
Don't get me wrong, there is the odd new girl who is absolutely stunning and is worth a watch, but it is generally just the same old, 3 pair of pantie wearing, sleeping on the job, glum faced girls, who aren't worth watching at all.
Is it just me or is Sexstation just THE worst channel on air now......changed days eh!
Listen....this is only my opinion, but I'd like to hear yours too.
Cheers.
|
|
17-01-2009 20:28 |
|
Dreamlander
.
Posts: 1,773
Joined: Dec 2008
|
RE: Opinion of the SKY channels???
You make a valid point.Sometimes I wish I had just bought Sky and found the 900 channels for the first time.It would all be so fresh and exciting then! Having watched these channels pretty much since day one,like so many others here,I see today's channels as a very 'watered down' erotica free zone. My main interest now is in the daytime shows and hoping for some 'happy accidents'!
I also see why a channel like 960 gets so much interest,even though it is technically shite! It's different and not mainstream like the others. Getting something you didn't expect,rubbish or not,is what all of these channels used to specialise in.Now it's so predictable even naked bodies have become,for the most part, uninteresting!
Dreamlander
|
|
17-01-2009 21:08 |
|
Dreamlander
.
Posts: 1,773
Joined: Dec 2008
|
RE: Opinion of the SKY channels???
Sorry,It does seem a little churlish to be complaining about have loads of semi naked girls on our screens lol!
I just think of all the teenage lads getting freeview boxes for the first time and discovering channels 37 and 46! I remember my first 12" B/W portable and Channel 4 showing the Bo Derek Tarzan film the first night I got it! Ah...halcyon days!
Dreamlander
|
|
17-01-2009 21:21 |
|
Dreamlander
.
Posts: 1,773
Joined: Dec 2008
|
RE: Opinion of the SKY channels???
oopnorth Wrote:Thinking of teenage lads eh Dreamlander, sure your on the right site.
I knew I'd phrased that wrong lol!
Dreamlander
|
|
17-01-2009 21:57 |
|
Gaz "AV1" Aston
Account Closed
Posts: 11,646
Joined: Nov 2008
|
RE: Opinion of the SKY channels???
I think your dead right MikeyBhoy!!! All the shows need a drastic upheavel but im not sure what exactly they could do to change it! We know that there hands are tied regarding making the shows sexier (hence the multiple layers the girls wear these days!) There is only so many places available for new girls so you can only have so many fresh faces (& boobs lol)
What would you suggest they do?
|
|
17-01-2009 22:05 |
|