BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL
. . . .
Posts: 788
Joined: Aug 2009
|
RE: Anna Lovato - Bluebird TV
(16-04-2010 12:44 )199lives Wrote: (16-04-2010 04:32 )BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL Wrote: Obviously - now that we have babechannels ourselves - we're not in business to promote other channels' girls or their websites by putting them in our movies, which [quite apart from DVD and web] sell in 278 million cable homes worldwide - outside the UK.
All talent are free to choose what career path they wish to follow. Some will join us as a full part of the Bluebird experience: some won't join us.
Is this implying that Delta (or any girl) will not be allowed to shoot for bluebird and continue to work for Elite, she will have to choose between them?
Mods: there is a bit of delta talk overs the last couple of pages wonder if would be better to move it to the Delta thread out of Anna's
We don't want this thread morphing back into another discussion of Girls' contracts do we ?
The girls are free agents. They choose who they want to work with and on what terms, as do we.
Thanks
|
|
16-04-2010 15:32 |
|
MARCCE
Senior Poster
Posts: 481
Joined: Oct 2008
Reputation: 26
|
RE: Anna Lovato - Bluebird TV
(16-04-2010 04:34 )BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL Wrote: [Most Forumites may find what you say a bit odd: since around the no.1 'like' expressed by them is that babechannel owners ask what the Fans want on this Forum. Oh well, guess some people don't like to be asked - just told.
Not at all. You chose to ask the question on one particular forum and asked what it was that made that particular channel so good in many people's eyes.
What I took from that is that you have no new ideas and are thinking of setting up something along the lines of what Elite are already doing and have done.
People like to be asked what they want but not when it's in "please tell us why Elite is so good so that we can copy it" fashion.
After all, a few of their popular girls will be joining your channels so to just have them doing what they're already doing at Elite would seem to offer almost instant sucees.
Maybe I'm being too cynical and that's not what you're thinking but that's how it comes across in my eyes.
|
|
16-04-2010 17:01 |
|
chrislatimer
Banned
Posts: 3,482
Joined: Jan 2009
|
RE: Anna Lovato - Bluebird TV
i disagree with that point.
bluebird has just took elite as an example, and asked why do we like them, doesnt mean hes gonna go out and copy them like for like.
from what i gather bluebirds channels will not be so much like elites as you think.
|
|
16-04-2010 17:05 |
|
MARCCE
Senior Poster
Posts: 481
Joined: Oct 2008
Reputation: 26
|
RE: Anna Lovato - Bluebird TV
(16-04-2010 16:22 )Signboy Wrote: Thank toy Tintin, Someone has finally seen the light, I remember when elite first started everyone was telling Jamie who to poach mainly from Babestation and Bang Babes, Anna was one of them i recall, Anna and Carmen who where day-time girls left to work nights and i think we where all delighted by that, Now Anna is leaving to further her career, which means we also get to see her having SEX and people are saying NO, she should stay with elite.
I feel like im in the twlight zone
This is hugely different. Elite were another babechannel, the same as Babestation, Bangbabes or whoever. They had no prior hold on any of the girls that joined them.
Bluebird have a lot of girls under contract with them for various porn stuff.
Say someone like Delta does still retain a Bluebird contract but chooses to stay with Elite on the babeshows. Do you think Bluebird are going to allow her to do anything on Elite that could conceivably infringe on them selling Delta dvd's?
She seems to have noticeably toned down on Elite lately. Does she ever move off the seating for one thing? Maybe that's got nothing to do with her contract on Bluebird but it isn't difficult to see a situation emerging where girls contracted to Bluebird will have to agree contracts that forbid them to do stuff like going naked and g/g on the babe channels.
That clearly is going to affect the content that the other babe channels are going to show. Elite enticed some girls to move but didn't infringe on what the rival channels were going to be able to show.
That's the difference.
|
|
16-04-2010 17:19 |
|