Opinion of the SKY channels???

astonv1 Wrote:I think your dead right MikeyBhoy!!! All the shows need a drastic upheavel but im not sure what exactly they could do to change it! We know that there hands are tied regarding making the shows sexier (hence the multiple layers the girls wear these days!) There is only so many places available for new girls so you can only have so many fresh faces (& boobs lol)

What would you suggest they do?

best thing to do is for ofcom to f#@k off, these are ment to be adult channels if u don't like what u see switch off, u can see tits out on channels like FTV fashion during the day so why spoil channels that are ment to be for that sort of entertainment, after all we can all make our own choice of what to watch, i do think the pin code for channels might be a good idea, but most of the "younger" viewers probably know how to work the sky/freewiew boxes better than the parents any way

After reading the start of this thread last night I went through all the channels to see which girls were on and the level of excitement I got from each.

Sadly within that limited sample I found only 2 that made me want to stay and watch more - Lolly Badcock & Sophia Lares (Lolly always puts in a high energy performance & appears to really enjoy her work and Sophia was wearing an outfit I've never seen her in before - short, with a plunging neckline - and her boobs looked tremendous).

Maybe the problem is that although there are a large number of channels the majority of girls tick certain preconceived boxes regarding what is beautiful & sexy (and don't take that comment the wrong way if I was to see any one of these ladies in a club / pub etc I would think she was stunning but then I doubt there would be 20 to 25 girls that all looked that good in the same location and therefore that one would stand out ) and the rules they operate under are so strict that after a while it does make the shows appear "boring" and each appears to be a clone of the last one you viewed.

I would like to see a group of girls who collectively appeal to all tastes, who are euthastic (I appreciate that it can be tough at times re the hours worked and possible abuse suffered), who are allowed more interaction with each other & the viewer via texts etc and allowed to push the boundaries (If Sky are allowed to show 15 / 18 rated movies during the day via a pin number why can't these channels operate a similar system??)

I would just like to see some consistancy.I was watching 327 and 328 last night and they had those french 'lovers' films on. There was simulated sex,anal sex,blow jobs,G/G and B/G and all the while they were naked and the film was edited not to show too much but you could still see male and female genitalia frequently! These are not films as the story is minimal and just a series of sexual encounters but this is a film channel! Can you imagine any 900 freeview channel getting away with full nudity these days and simulating oral sex whilst nude,i don't think so!

Dreamlander

Ive had an idea:
Whilst flicking through the various channels last night i came across a programme on FIVER (i think!) called "A Girls Guide to 21st Century Sex". I dont know if anyone has seen it but it was on at 10pm and showed explicit images of womens vaginas (one girl was maturbating) a mans penis fully erect and penetration with cum shot (filmed internally using small cameras...obviously!) but they were aloud to show this as it was classed as an "educational show for women".

My Idea is that all the babe channels re classify their shows as educational! This would mean that they could lose the 3 layers of clothing a lot of them seem to wear. Lose the trance music that is endlessly played on loop whilst the girls are on the phone, and actually get some of the girls to speak to us , the viewing public! Make it a proper show like Parky but with Naked women!
e.g. Have Dionne interview Camilla, let Camilla tell us what she likes and dislikes sexually then have them both demonstrate it for us! This would be highly educational stuff.

Okay! maybe i've thought about it a bit too hard but i still think it sucks that Ofcom can come down so heavily on the babe channels for showing less than you can see on channel 5 after 10pm!

Bring back flash the gash!

Bye the way has anyone seen the film 9 songs?
For those of you that haven't its got a blow job scene, a female masturbation scene and a full penetrative sex scene with cumshot and was given an 18 certificate! Thats the same certificate that these channels have and the girls arent even aloud to wear just 1 pair of knickers! Outrageous

astonv1 Wrote:Ive had an idea:
Whilst flicking through the various channels last night i came across a programme on FIVER (i think!) called "A Girls Guide to 21st Century Sex". I dont know if anyone has seen it but it was on at 10pm and showed explicit images of womens vaginas (one girl was maturbating) a mans penis fully erect and penetration with cum shot (filmed internally using small cameras...obviously!) but they were aloud to show this as it was classed as an "educational show for women".

Great idea!!

If you didn't already know one of the models used in your above mentioned clips is Porn Star Elizabeth Lawrence which means that owing to our bizarre laws you can see her in hardcore "educational" clips on C4 and not see her in any HC stuff on TVX or any of the other channels which are supposed to be sex channels.Only in England.......................

Honestly, I'm not so sure more explicit nudity would do anything more than give a brief boost of interest to long term viewers.

(At the risk of causing offense or being branded a heretic)

The biggest problem I can see on the channels at the moment is that it's all very similar. I can switch from one channel to the next and it's just the same routines played out by different faces. Late shows in particular suffer from girls stuck in the same constrained and, dare I say, unimaginative format, basically just repeating the same few moves over and over. There's no build-up and little sensuality, nothing to build excitement, anticipation or tension.. just clothes off and into routine - shake your arse. now on your back, raise your leg and shake it again, now fake cowgirl and have a chat with the cameraman... and repeat.

Taking away the one piece of clothing left isn't going to change much. It's certainly not going to add any spark to the shows. It'll just be the same old disinteresting routines performed by disinterested girls with a bit more showing.

IMHO it comes down to a mindset of thinking that once the watershed has been reached and the girls can be naked they should be, and should remain so for the duration. It's a terrible mindset because it leaves nowhere else to go other than having the girl shake her arse in the camera for several hours. You've actually missed out on the chance for the girls to be playful and seductive, to tease and flirt much like they do on the daytime shows but with the added benefit of being able to take it that bit further. It's the wait, the chase, the anticipation, the teasing and the long awaited reveal or slip which make things so much more interesting and exciting, and it allows the girl to put so much more of her character across, her nature and gives her a bit more freedom to have a little fun with the viewers in her own way.

Someone mentioned earlier about how just a scene in a movie was a big deal to them when they were younger. Again, it's down to the build-up and anticipation, the promise of what is to come and the eventual or intermittent reveal rather than a constant film long display of nudity in place of context. Same applies to this board - look how many posters get excited about ,and hunt for, slips on the daytime shows. Another thread talks about channel 960 and how dull it is, but it has a fair following just for the "possibilities" and occasional nudity.

I'd guarantee that it the late shows operated more in the format of the daytime shows, but used the post-watershed timing to let the girls take the teasing that bit further, then despite the girls showing less, the shows would be a lot more interesting and enticing than if the girls were simply allowed to remove that one last piece of clothing.

Nigma Wrote:I'd guarantee that it the late shows operated more in the format of the daytime shows, but used the post-watershed timing to let the girls take the teasing that bit further, then despite the girls showing less, the shows would be a lot more interesting and enticing than if the girls were simply allowed to remove that one last piece of clothing.

As much as it hurts me to admit it, I think Nigma is right...

also...with the risk of sounding misogynistic and naustalgia aside, I think the quality of the babes has improved since the early days..

cherryryder Wrote:

Nigma Wrote:I'd guarantee that it the late shows operated more in the format of the daytime shows, but used the post-watershed timing to let the girls take the teasing that bit further, then despite the girls showing less, the shows would be a lot more interesting and enticing than if the girls were simply allowed to remove that one last piece of clothing.

As much as it hurts me to admit it, I think Nigma is right...

also...with the risk of sounding misogynistic and naustalgia aside, I think the quality of the babes has improved since the early days..

Agreed. When Babestation first started it had a very similar appeal to that of channel 960 now. You never knew what the hell you were going to get as the girls all worked to different levels of sexiness and nudity. It made for a far more exciting show, I think.