RRROGER
Posting Machine
Posts: 7,298
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 123
|
|
14-05-2010 02:08 |
|
BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL
. . . .
Posts: 788
Joined: Aug 2009
|
RE: Bluebird TV
(14-05-2010 00:24 )RRROGER Wrote: For attention of Bluebird Official, for the benefit of the forum, can you explain what your relationship is with Cellcast & if your debut in this sector will be rebadging Cellcast programming as well as any of your own new content?????
Check out my FutureStatusPredictions thread & note reference to thread "Casting for girls",posted by BluebirdTalent, talent manager for Bluebird, touting for girls to join Bluebird; nothing odd about that, but I think it odd that most of his other posts have been informative & sometimes seemingly inside information about Cellcast shows over the last 18 months.....suggesting he's more than just a fan of the shows; everything I see suggests Bluebird & Cellcast are the same company or in coalition........anyway let's chill out & let's get on with the show, these forums can get a bit heavy sometimes....
Bluebird and Cellcast are completely different companies.
We own all our channels. We don't lease any.
We have an agreement with Cellcast not to take their talent without their prior consent. As will have been noticed, they have consented to some talent transfers.
Also - we don't know who shot Kennedy
There's lots of information about our owner Paul Chaplin on our Bleubirdfilms.com blog: http://www.bluebirdfilms.com/wordpress_new/?p=2442
|
|
14-05-2010 10:35 |
|
RRROGER
Posting Machine
Posts: 7,298
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 123
|
RE: Bluebird TV
(14-05-2010 10:35 )BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL Wrote: We have an agreement with Cellcast not to take their talent without their prior consent. As will have been noticed, they have consented to some talent transfers.
Also - we don't know who shot Kennedy
That's a contradiction in terms........
Seems at odds with your earlier reply to accusations of girl poaching, about your "agreement" with Cellcast to not poach their girls; but seems you have a back door recruitment campaign; put the word out on the grapevine, leave the door open, recruit anybody walks in that meets your criteria, find out who they are after signing contract.......... this is where BluebirdTalent comes in???...ex Cellcast????
That way you haven't poached them.....they've poached themselves,& why would Cellcast consent, given a choice, with the recent steady exodus of girls to other channels, not Bluebird....
Remember...Beware Playboy TV...it's not the ides of March on this forum ....
Have a nice day, my local Montgomeryshire pub has got Chiswick's finest beer as guest...Fuller's London Pride & I'm off to get some down my neck...this posting is thirsty work.
|
|
14-05-2010 12:21 |
|
BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL
. . . .
Posts: 788
Joined: Aug 2009
|
RE: Bluebird TV
(14-05-2010 12:21 )RRROGER Wrote: (14-05-2010 10:35 )BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL Wrote: We have an agreement with Cellcast not to take their talent without their prior consent. As will have been noticed, they have consented to some talent transfers.
Also - we don't know who shot Kennedy
That's a contradiction in terms........
Seems at odds with your earlier reply to accusations of girl poaching, about your "agreement" with Cellcast to not poach their girls; but seems you have a back door recruitment campaign; put the word out on the grapevine, leave the door open, recruit anybody walks in that meets your criteria, find out who they are after signing contract.......... this is where BluebirdTalent comes in???...ex Cellcast????
That way you haven't poached them.....they've poached themselves,& why would Cellcast consent, given a choice, with the recent steady exodus of girls to other channels, not Bluebird....
Remember...Beware Playboy TV...it's not the ides of March on this forum ....
Have a nice day, my local Montgomeryshire pub has got Chiswick's finest beer as guest...Fuller's London Pride & I'm off to get some down my neck...this posting is thirsty work.
Nope, sorry you've lost us now.
What we just posted was completely clear.
Everyone understands what "not without their consent" means. There is no contradiction.
This latest 'backdoor/grapevine' conspiracy theory makes no sense in itself: such a policy would be in breach of our agreement with Cellcast.
What exactly is everyone supposed to worry about with Playboy by the way ? That the weight of their unpayable bond debt papers is gonna fall on someone's foot?
Our US TV output is already outselling PB in every state & on every platform.
|
|
14-05-2010 23:16 |
|