munch1917
Silence is golden
Posts: 2,179
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 70
|
RE: Camilla
Just looking through some of the footage from last night, and a thought occurs regarding the missing christina piercing.
There's quite a bit of really close to the mark stuff, not really slips or flashes, but darn close. There's more than one occasion where she is on her back, backwards to the camera, legs spread. Everything is basically on display, but not really clear because of the angle. If the piercing was there, it would be obvious what you are seeing, the piercing pretty much pointed the way.
Similarly, she does a lot of rolling over lately, just with her legs pressed together to hide the goods, she even did a kind of pirouette while standing the night before. Again, the top of the piercing would almost certainly be on display in those poses, and any slight slip would be more obvious as a result.
So, I wonder if the removal was a deliberate tactical thing so she can continue going right to the limit without the slips being too obvious and causing problems. Perhaps it was even an instruction from on high, remove the piercing, or keep it covered!
munch
"I'm a featherless bird ... in a sky so absurd"
Sophia - Becky - Mica - Camilla - Ella
|
|
13-06-2010 05:03 |
|
mrmann
Posting Machine
Posts: 15,880
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 92
|
RE: Camilla
I think someone asked her to remove it, though it's not like we don't remember where it was
I still find the censorship to be funny, since most children are in bed before the watershed, and since the only viewers are people who WANT to see a naked woman. Does Offcom really think that seeing a vagina is worse than seeing women spank, suck, lick and spit on each other or pretend to perform oral sex? Why show us bare bums, camel toe, a bit of pubic hair and everything else, but no vajayjay? I don't think the viewers are going to be offended. So silly. The channels do a good job of giving us glimpses here and there, which is nice.
(This post was last modified: 13-06-2010 23:46 by mrmann.)
|
|
13-06-2010 23:36 |
|
double3
Junior Poster
Posts: 97
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 7
|
RE: Camilla
(13-06-2010 23:36 )mrmann Wrote: I think someone asked her to remove it, though it's not like we don't remember where it was
I still find the censorship to be funny, since most children are in bed before the watershed, and since the only viewers are people who WANT to see a naked woman. Does Offcom really think that seeing a vagina is worse than seeing women spank, suck, lick and spit on each other or pretend to perform oral sex? Why show us bare bums, camel toe, a bit of pubic hair and everything else, but no vajayjay? I don't think the viewers are going to be offended. So silly. The channels do a good job of giving us glimpses here and there, which is nice.
I feel very offended of the fact that they have disabled the right for us to see ther vaginas, it should be the performers choice not ofcom
|
|
14-06-2010 00:19 |
|