Is Anyone Else Getting Bored Of The Night Shows?

(22-06-2010 20:48 )Regenerated Wrote:  No.

Ah, well. That's you and Insomniac, at least

No I'm not, but given a choice of nighttime things to do, in order of preference:

#1 Watch 22 pairs of ladies' tits
#2 Go to bed early
#3 Watch 22 pairs of hairy legs chasing a ball around a field

(22-06-2010 16:05 )KateP Wrote:  

(22-06-2010 15:12 )mrmann Wrote:  I'm getting a bit bored with the lineup on Babestation, as they use a lot of the less attractive women most of the time. Babestation does have some beautiful women though, which is nice, but I still think Elite gives better shows, especially 2-4-1's.

What I'm most bored with is the petty censorship. I've said this before, but I find the fact that we can see very explicit acts, but not a woman's natural body part to be sad. Having the women cover themselves, and watching as the camera men freak out when a slip happens is just plain silly. We are watching these shows for a reason, and they are after the watershed, and are for 18 and up, so how old do we have to be to see a body part? 18 isn't old enough to see a vagina? Umm, OK.

That's what gets old.

unless they go encrypted that will always be the way as kids can still get access to the late shows as they are now its easy even late night you are not allowed to do a ton of stuff unless you are ppv

I'd be fine with encryption, but many people don't want it, and Offcom doesn't seem to either.

Another thing, most kids will be in bed before and after the watershed, and those watching these channels will be doing so on purpose (Most parents who are worried about it will have a child proof lock on them anyway). Also, how much harm would a female body part cause a child who accidentally turned to the channel? IMO, no harm, as it's not something to be looked upon as being harmful, and these shows are done in a fun way, and not violent. IMO, Offcom really doesn't care if 1 in five million innocent little children happen to switch to the 900 hundred channels, and the only reason the censorship is present is so that Offcom can have some control and feel in power. Otherwise, all of the other more explicit stuff would be censored! I also think the reason we haven't had encryption for these channels, is because doing so would allow for a more explicit show, leaving Offcom with even less power. If that happened, then Offcom would probably try to impose a different set of rules in order to remain in charge. So, perhaps we might finally have full frontal nudity for once, but I could see Offcom deciding not to allow any more 2-4-1's. That's something they would do if we had encryption, I think. I am rambling on a bit.

well my only worry with encryption is how they would let us pay the old days of paying on your sky tv bill seem to be dead as most adult channels are now credit card so that would rule me out

thing is you are assuming all parents give a crap about what there kids some don't while others are not good at using all the stuff we have now and kids know more about this tech than they do ofcom have nothing to do with why we have not an encrypted channel that is more the shows bosses they have to make money and if they think the majority will not sign up then its lost phone cash coming in plus another worry would be how many of the girls would do it

truth of the matter is I bet anyone any amount that ofcom would love all the babe shows to be ppv it would make there job easier as everything you want to see naked girls getting it on is all legal

"I reject your reality, and substitute my own" ■ Commander Shepard We fight or we die! That's the plan!
Xbox live ID Exiled Mystique ■ PSN Romanus1

Anastasia Harris| Tori Lee| Felicity Hill | Mikaela Witt| Evelyn | Kitty Lea | Cali Garcia | Macy Leigh | Priya | Preeti | Clare Richards| Gemma Hiles | Emma Spellar | Sophia Knight | Dionne Daniels | Adele | Teejay Walker | Paige Green | Lana | Cara Steel | Mikayla Bayliss | Danica | Kandi Kay | Delia Rose | Hannah Martin | Emma C | Cara Brett

With Pay Per View, money will be an issue with many, if not most people, as Pay Per View tends to be a rip off. I'd be up for that if the price was right, and only if we could have the same women that we watch now.

I hope Offcom can cut the channels some slack, come September, or at least come up with an alternative that will make us, the channels AND themselves happy. It can't be that hard, can it?

well with the budget today and the cuts coming we will need something to make us happy or I might just go back home to bc canada

"I reject your reality, and substitute my own" ■ Commander Shepard We fight or we die! That's the plan!
Xbox live ID Exiled Mystique ■ PSN Romanus1

Anastasia Harris| Tori Lee| Felicity Hill | Mikaela Witt| Evelyn | Kitty Lea | Cali Garcia | Macy Leigh | Priya | Preeti | Clare Richards| Gemma Hiles | Emma Spellar | Sophia Knight | Dionne Daniels | Adele | Teejay Walker | Paige Green | Lana | Cara Steel | Mikayla Bayliss | Danica | Kandi Kay | Delia Rose | Hannah Martin | Emma C | Cara Brett

The deciding factor that makes the Babe Channels so dull for me is the constant showing of same old faces night after night, some girls are overused to the point of ridiculousness.

I realise these channels use the girls who bring the most money over those that dont - but from a simple viewers perspective it's just flat-out boring seeing the same girl on three or four times a week, when there are other girls who only get to make the odd appearance now and again.

I've posted elsewhere about the merits of encryption & that providing "harder" programme content, on a par with the TVX/RedHot or Playboy encrypted soft porn,is what is needed to maintain the level of interest in these programmes.
If we assume that most viewers are watching the shows on TV, ie SKY, they presumably have a SKY account, encryption would be similar to having the BoxOffice option requiring a pin number to access the programme, but shouldn't necessarily mean you have to pay another fee to watch a particular programme, unless the programme provider sets it up so; last night for example,several of the TVX/Redhot programmes required Pin number to access their pre watershed, up to 9:00pm,freeview shows as EPG designation was 15 or 18.
Final crucial factor as far as the broadcasters are concerned is that although there may be a handful of whingers in this forum, maybe the vast majority of people watching the shows are happy with the content as it is.

(23-06-2010 06:33 )Josh187 Wrote:  I realise these channels use the girls who bring the most money over those that dont - but from a simple viewers perspective it's just flat-out boring seeing the same girl on three or four times a week, when there are other girls who only get to make the odd appearance now and again.

Most viewers don't watch every day though, so the majority will not see any girl 3 or 4 times a week.

(22-06-2010 17:25 )StanTheMan Wrote:  

(22-06-2010 14:44 )KateP Wrote:  I dont have high hopes for bluebird as they have to live by the same rules the rest do...

SNIP

SNIP

Personally I can't wait for Bluebird. I think they have a lot of clout, what with thier reputation as the US porn kings I imagine they have a huge team of legal eagles behind them. It could just be that Bluebird come along and start putting out the kind of show that responsible adults should be allowed to watch in the early hours of the morning on a dedicated adult channel, knowing full well that any challenges from Ofcom will result in a 'see you in court' letter winging its way right back to them.

From discussions elsewhere on this site, and as far as I can tell, Bluebird appear to have no intention whatsoever of standing up to Ofcon, sadly.