countryboy
absolutely fucking cake-o
Posts: 510
Joined: Apr 2009
|
RE: Danica - Chat & Discussion
(21-08-2010 00:26 )astonv1 Wrote: (21-08-2010 00:05 )countryboy Wrote: Oh the camera is zooming in on Dionne between the legs with only the bubbles covering her... NO WAIT SHE HAS PANTS ON - HOW IS THAT SEXY!??!! for fuck sake. Now 1am and Danica is bored out of her skull. Please no more 241 with Dionne.
So every girl on these shows should be naked then? In which case when they zoomed in on Dionne when she had her legs open she would have revealed her pussy....I think you will find that they are not allowed to show that on British TV.
So What exactly are you missing out on????
You didnt think that one through very well did you?
read properly... with bubbles covering her so you'd see nowt if she didn't have anything on - knowing she's naked underneath is sexy, knowing underneath the bubbles she has pants on isn't. get it now???
|
|
21-08-2010 00:32 |
|
Wazo
Mr Daniels
Posts: 7,095
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 136
|
RE: Danica - Chat & Discussion
(21-08-2010 00:22 )mrmann Wrote: To Dionne's credit, she DID go nude while she was alone, and she deserves lots of praise, but that changed once the 2-4-1 started. Danica is beautiful and I'm glad she was on, but the 2-4-1's with her and Dionne don't work!!! It's kind of common sense now, not to put them together. Last night was lame, so now they put the two of them in the bath together? They looked beautiful for sure, but that doesn't make it a good 2-4-1. The one with Caty was also lame, though I partially blame the akward set. As for Danica not taking off her underwear, well I'll leave that to your imagination, though she did wear partial see throughs early on.
See This is another thing that annoys me you say dont put them together again an that they dont work well together but at the end of the day i bet to god that them call stats prove the opposite an they do work.
Bazinga!
|
|
21-08-2010 00:33 |
|
Gaz "AV1" Aston
Account Closed
Posts: 11,646
Joined: Nov 2008
|
RE: Danica - Chat & Discussion
(21-08-2010 00:32 )countryboy Wrote: read properly... with bubbles covering her so you'd see nowt if she didn't have anything on - knowing she's naked underneath is sexy, knowing underneath the bubbles she has pants on isn't. get it now???
either way you see fuck all...so why get mad?
|
|
21-08-2010 00:39 |
|