Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

(23-09-2010 22:43 )Jam Da Man Wrote:  

(23-09-2010 22:16 )iloveMegan Wrote:  Anyone else notice a dip in picture quality on BS1 and Partyland (BSX is okay) the past week or so? Hard to explain, but it's almost like a thin layer of faint interference going across the screen. The last thing BS needs is worse picture quality, and I don't think it's my signal.

Yes, I see it on the web stream and freeview too.

Apparently the interference on the web stream (been happening for some time) is because the signal is taken from a Sky satbox, not a direct feed from the studio. So does this mean that the Freeview feed is now also being taken from a Sky satbox???

(24-09-2010 02:21 )vila Wrote:  

(23-09-2010 23:48 )HannahsPet Wrote:  Last i saw of Raven she was on Bluekiss before it bit the dust along with babecast to become partyland.

Can someone enlighten me on this?

I've seen numerous references to Sexstation becoming Partyland and now a suggestion that Bluekiss/Babecast became Partyland. I don't have Sky but I'm totally convinced that for several months after Partyland started I was reading show reports on here regarding Bluekiss, Sexstation and Partyland (Sky) all running concurrently.

Yes, they did run concurrently for a short while. Going by the threads on here it seems that:

LiveXXX (957) ceased and became Partyland on 18th March 2009.
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=5166

Babecast (907) ceased and started broadcasting Partyland on 26th March 2009.
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=5450

Sexstation (910) ceased and started broadcasting Partyland on 22nd June 2009.
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=8613

Bluekiss (951) ceased and started broadcasting PartyGirls on 27th August 2009.
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...#pid209358
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...#pid209701

But in her last year, Raven was primarily on LiveXXX, not BlueKiss - so the show she appeared on did 'become' Partyland.

Must be a good couple of years since Raven left. Told me last time I spoke that she was getting too old for the shows but don't know if that was the real reason.

(24-09-2010 03:07 )skateguy Wrote:  ~~~~
~~~~
~~~~
Bluekiss (951) ceased and started broadcasting PartyGirls on 27th August 2009.
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...#pid209358
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...#pid209701
~~~~
~~~~

This version of PartyGirls (nothing to do with the PartyGirls show on freeview ch46 which had ended months before) then became BS extra on 27/28 October 2009

(23-09-2010 11:40 )Ally4Paige Wrote:  

(23-09-2010 11:34 )babestation Wrote:  To be honest, with this kind of stuff I agree with you, I've forwarded your post on to a couple of people that can hopefully keep more of an eye on these things. With BSX promo's, I have no idea how they go about it, so couldn't say if it was intentional or not, but certainly with the last image where you can't see any of Dani, that shouldn't really happen. Not for any length of time anyway, it make sometimes happen and then get corrected relatively quickly.

If you agree with our complaints then why the hell don't you make sure someone does something about it NOW!!!!

Babestation if nothing is done about our complaints you are the poor bugger who is going to continue copping the flak for this. For your own sanity sort it out now or get someone else on here to take the flak for a change!!! BTW take a look at the Crap OSG thread!!!

Alright, chiiiiiill. Who do you think you're talking to on here when you talk to Babestation? It's not the whole company personified into 1 entity that knows everything, can change everything, knows every single person at the company and can sort out every problem every person has on here. The best us 2 can ever do about it is flag up these posts, and forward them onto the people that can (and sometimes should) sort it out. We can't physically "make sure someone does something about it". We can't do the graphics ourselves or go down to the studio to tell cameraman to zoom out.

All your grievances are known and have been passed on. Hopefully things will change for the better.

P.S. no amount of 'flak' from you guys would cause me to have any concerns about my sanity, there are more important things in the world right?

(24-09-2010 02:47 )vila Wrote:  Apparently the interference on the web stream (been happening for some time) is because the signal is taken from a Sky satbox, not a direct feed from the studio. So does this mean that the Freeview feed is now also being taken from a Sky satbox???

i couldn't believe me eyes when i turned on the webstream last night, the quality is shocking. the colours are distorted and either way too bright or way too dull, the lighting of the girls is terrible, but most of all the ridiculously poor picture quality- the level of interference is dreadful. please try and fix it fellas

(24-09-2010 10:45 )Freebird Wrote:  i couldn't believe me eyes when i turned on the webstream last night, the quality is shocking. the colours are distorted and either way too bright or way too dull, the lighting of the girls is terrible, but most of all the ridiculously poor picture quality- the level of interference is dreadful. please try and fix it fellas

we've got the equipment ready to go back to a clean feed from the studio for the web stream, just waiting for the operations team to get it all up and running and then we'll be back with a much better quality stream

excellent news. i only brought it up in the first place because i hadn't used the webstream for a while and was pretty surprised about the massive downturn it had seemingly taken.

(23-09-2010 22:11 )mrmann Wrote:  I've often wondered about pictures like the one with Tiff and Kandi on the balcony. Would that be considered public indecency since they are technically outside? I'm not a prude, but if someone complained about seeing them, could Tiff and Kandi actually get arrested? If it was a guy in the pictures, if caught, he'd likely either get arrested or have to pay a fine. What's the legality with stuff like this? Just curious, and I love the pics by the way!

I have absolutely no idea, haha.

Perhaps it would be OK as it's private property...

(24-09-2010 11:18 )babestation Wrote:  

(23-09-2010 22:11 )mrmann Wrote:  I've often wondered about pictures like the one with Tiff and Kandi on the balcony. Would that be considered public indecency since they are technically outside? I'm not a prude, but if someone complained about seeing them, could Tiff and Kandi actually get arrested? If it was a guy in the pictures, if caught, he'd likely either get arrested or have to pay a fine. What's the legality with stuff like this? Just curious, and I love the pics by the way!

I have absolutely no idea, haha.

Perhaps it would be OK as it's private property...

Perhaps, in England, but in America you'll get a fine or arrested, unless you live surrounded by trees and someone snuck onto your property and complained about you. England seems to be more concerned about showing the genitals, but in the U.S you can get in trouble for showing anything, even if it's just a college student walking around town in a shirt and boxers, as I saw him get arrested. Pretty silly really