Bangbabes - Discussion Thread

Its now Monday and its safe to safe that Bangbabes as we know them is finished. Instead it'll just be a mediocre run of the mill show now instead. 912 and 959 are not coming back, yes I too haven't see a naked show or anything close to what we were treated too in the last few months. It's very sad to see channel up the shitter in this way. The shows on 902 have been absolute pish not even worth a mention. Babeworld was even showing more explicit material. I hope I'm wrong on this one but if 912 and 959 were to return it would have been back on air by now. RIP Bangbabes.

(22-11-2010 20:22 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  Its now Monday and its safe to safe that Bangbabes as we know them is finished. Instead it'll just be a mediocre run of the mill show now instead. 912 and 959 are not coming back, yes I too haven't see a naked show or anything close to what we were treated too in the last few months. It's very sad to see channel up the shitter in this way. The shows on 902 have been absolute pish not even worth a mention. Babeworld was even showing more explicit material. I hope I'm wrong on this one but if 912 and 959 were to return it would have been back on air by now. RIP Bangbabes.

There have been at least 2 naked shows in the last couple of weeks on freeview ch98
see http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...#pid665031
and
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...#pid665896
don't know what the Sky channel numbers were.

(22-11-2010 20:05 )cosmonaut Wrote:  

(20-11-2010 14:47 )mr mystery Wrote:  I think Bangmedia have been up to something in regards the channel name re-branding and changing channels 912 and 959 from "Tease me" to TMTN 1 and 2 , this was done for a reason , i just wonder if they acquired a different licence for these 2 channel , a European licence perhaps , and is this the loophole Bangmedia mentions

The licences for those 2 channels are Dutch, but Ofcom cannot prevent the transmission of channels just because the licences are Dutch.

Yes i know , Cellcast also have a Dutch licence but don't generally abuse it , but it may be nothing to do with the explicitness of the shows , it may be something to do with irregularities of the Licence transfer its self , nothing illegal but the I's and T's may not have been dotted and crossed properly or some thing like that , even with a Dutch licence Ofcom still have overall control of anything transmitted on UK tv , so until they or Sky themselves are are satisfied that every thing is done correctly Ofcom or Sky may be preventing Bangmedia from using Sky EPG's , if the freeview show also has a Dutch licence this could be why the freeview show is also being prevented from being shown , all this is just a theory of cause and is probably way off the mark . PS what if this Dutch licence is not the same one that Cellcast use but a much more hard core one , full frontal nudity perhaps ? and Sky or Ofcom have objected to it on the grounds that this type of material should not be shown on unencrypted UK tv , then Ofcom could prevent these programs being shown .

I don't think its ofcom since there is no mention of Bangbabes in the ofcom bulletin published today.
I think it is Sky behind it. I have read previously that they plan to take "channel one" (on ch20) off freeview because they consider it to be similar to Sky 3. They tookover the "Virgin 1" channel and renamed it "channel one" a few months ago.
Ch98 timeshares with ch20 at present.

(22-11-2010 21:29 )TheWatcher Wrote:  I don't think its ofcom since there is no mention of Bangbabes in the ofcom bulletin published today.
I think it is Sky behind it. I have read previously that they plan to take "channel one" (on ch20) off freeview because they consider it to be similar to Sky 3. They tookover the "Virgin 1" channel and renamed it "channel one" a few months ago.
Ch98 timeshares with ch20 at present.

Offcom seems to be a little slow to reveal things, as I've only now just read about complaints of a certain channel from two months back! Would Offcom mention the issues with Bang Babes right away, or not?

I think Mr. Mystery is right on his assumption, sadly. Full frontal nudity is just too evil and dangerous for Offcom, and is soooo horrible and disgusting that it can only be seen on encrypted TV, yet we can still see it on the regular channels almost every night. Sexcetera, Sexarama, Eurotrash and even here and there on The Naked Office. Oh, the hypocrisy

I don't suppose anyone's tried contacting Bang Media through their website and asking them the direct question?

I'll presume not in that no one's said as much. I'll go and see if they have any contact details there.

[edit] Just sent them an email. The adress is web@bangmedia.tv for anyone that wants to do likewise.

(22-11-2010 21:29 )TheWatcher Wrote:  I don't think its ofcom since there is no mention of Bangbabes in the ofcom bulletin published today.

I don't think it's Ofcom either, but if it is we are unlikely to see anything in a bulletin for two or three months, maybe more.

(23-11-2010 00:56 )StanTheMan Wrote:  I don't suppose anyone's tried contacting Bang Media through their website and asking them the direct question?

I'll presume not in that no one's said as much.

Yes they have - semipro here http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...#pid670485

and admin here - http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...#pid670652

very nice 2-4-1 with emily and dionne v, just one quick question are the girl not allowed to kiss anymore ?, they done alot of nipple licking and fingers but no kissing

Anyone tell me why theres only 1 bangbabes channel now? And perhaps why we now have sportxxx babes and 40+ wives back? Sorry to go off post there.