cherry tv

clips4sale


Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 17 Vote(s) - 3.24 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

RIP Bang Babes : Gone Bust...

Author Message
StanTheMan Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
Post: #161
RE: RIP Bang Babes
Apart from nip/tit slips, can anyone give me a few examples of incidents on the early morning dayshows that have surprised so many with thier explicitness?

This isn't a loaded question by the way - I'm genuinley intriqued as I never bother with the breakfast shows.
(This post was last modified: 27-11-2010 15:18 by StanTheMan.)
27-11-2010 15:17
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Charlemagne Offline
Moderator
******

Posts: 65,428
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 218
Post: #162
RE: RIP Bang Babes
I thought that Ofcoms persecution of Bangbabes was just financial.
Money for the exchequer.

So Ofcom won't be able to ban them for long, or the chancellor will have to look for other forms of taxation
27-11-2010 15:25
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bigguy01 Offline
My Kind of Girl
*****

Posts: 5,584
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation: 61
Post: #163
RE: ........
(27-11-2010 14:40 )TammysNo1Fan Wrote:  
(27-11-2010 14:33 )frankie007 Wrote:  Can someone explain to me what "Lollipopgate" is? Its been mentioned a few times but i hav no idea? Any help would be appreciated.

Was when Amanda Rendall and Jemma Jey were on together and Amanda was sucking away on a lollipop and then pulled Jemma's knickers aside and stuck the lollipop into Jemma's pussy laugh

Then took it out and carried on sucking on it Tongue

that has to be the tastiest lollipop ever.

Top 5 Celebs To Be On The Channels: Molly Quinn, Stana Katic, Nina Dobrev, Susanna Reid, Steph McGovern
27-11-2010 15:28
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
gazfc Away
You can't delete truth
*****

Posts: 5,362
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 121
Post: #164
RE: RIP Bang Babes
(27-11-2010 15:11 )StanTheMan Wrote:  In South Africa, it was once a 'rule' that black people didn't mix with white people. Did the black people who were brave enough to fight against this 'rule' deserve the killings and persecution they received?


You seriously need to get out more if you think you can compare the two.
27-11-2010 15:49
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RESPONSIBLE ADULT Offline
Banned

Posts: 898
Joined: Jun 2010
Post: #165
RE: RIP Bang Babes
To change the tone of this entertaining debate a little. Who is it who marshals these programmes? Do Ofcom have an army of watchers who dutifully tune in and watch every single minute of transmissions each and every day. My last count there were at least twenty channels, most broadcasting twenty four hours a day seven days a week. To cover that much tv would be a massive undertaking. And for these poor souls who have to do such an unpleasant job on our behalf my heart goes out to them.

Just imagine having to sit in front of the telly for an eight hour shift waiting, waiting, waiting, without even daring to blink an eye in case that fraction of a second it takes, would deprive you of seeing a flash of pussie, "god forbid".

But seriously though, who does watch what's going on?
27-11-2010 15:56
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mr williams Offline
Still Missing Roxy :(
*****

Posts: 8,070
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 150
Post: #166
RE: RIP Bang Babes
A defence of Ofcom from another forum

Having worked under (but not for) a lot of different regulatory regimes (outside of TV as well), I have to say I reckon that Ofcom is pretty good as far as regulators go. They don't go looking for problems (unlike the ASA). They do however have to respond to complaints, and they have to do so according to the rules and laws...of both the UK and the EC. Ofcom is pretty consistent in the way it applies them. Yes, the nanny state marches onwards and upwards.... but blame the politicians, not the regulator. Regulators are easy political targets/pawns; hence the Tories promising to emasculate them, surely one of the most naiive electioneering promises they made....but they thought it might give them a few votes from trendy left-leaning media types.

..and when the politicians (on all sides) become too chicken to face up to difficult issues (as in Murdoch/Sky ownership), they either quietly bully the regulators, or hide behind them.

Don't blame Ofcom or the civil servants, who can only do what they are told. Judge a regulator by its consistency and adherence to its remit.

follow me on twitter @mrwilliamsforum

27-11-2010 16:08
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TheWatcher Offline
Ex Moderator
*****

Posts: 10,497
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 221
Post: #167
RE: ........
For the members who missed this last year.
I am posting this as an ordinary forum member, not as a mod, and it may get removed.
It does not imply that the original vid can be reposted.
But since Bang lied to us about the current problem, I feel free to repost this gif.
Its better quality than my original gif that was removed last year.
Thanks to the original uploader of the vid from which this gif was made, I can't remember who it was.

[Image: aj_animation.gif]
27-11-2010 16:14
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
gazfc Away
You can't delete truth
*****

Posts: 5,362
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 121
Post: #168
RE: RIP Bang Babes
Thanks for that as I've never seen it before
27-11-2010 16:22
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BiggieD Offline
Junior Poster
**

Posts: 83
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 1
Post: #169
RE: RIP Bang Babes
I never knew this. For fuck sake, I hope Donna Duke gets snapped up by another station.
27-11-2010 16:32
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
vila Offline
Viewers' Champion
*****

Posts: 3,588
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 51
Post: #170
RE: RIP Bang Babes
(27-11-2010 15:56 )smell the roses Wrote:  To change the tone of this entertaining debate a little. Who is it who marshals these programmes? Do Ofcom have an army of watchers who dutifully tune in and watch every single minute of transmissions each and every day. My last count there were at least twenty channels, most broadcasting twenty four hours a day seven days a week. To cover that much tv would be a massive undertaking. And for these poor souls who have to do such an unpleasant job on our behalf my heart goes out to them.

Just imagine having to sit in front of the telly for an eight hour shift waiting, waiting, waiting, without even daring to blink an eye in case that fraction of a second it takes, would deprive you of seeing a flash of pussie, "god forbid".

But seriously though, who does watch what's going on?

Ofcom don't need to do this for themselves. Unfortunately for the babe channels, and the vast bulk of normal humanity, there are plenty of bigoted, self-righteous prudes who can find nothing better to do than trawl the tv channels for any excuse to complain to Ofcom.
27-11-2010 16:51
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


gemma hiles