Rammyrascal
Team Thicc
Posts: 102,624
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 251
|
RE: RIP Bang Babes
"What I do think is wrong, is the logic of vehemently protecting those who never even watch the shows, whilst offering no protection whatsoever for those who do. The consumer, is, let’s face it, is open to being swindled on an almost 24/7 basis by babe channels. I’m not saying it’s all channels, but it’s certainly a number of them. And for the regulators to be unaware of this would defy belief. That the regulators can spring to the aid of one or two mysterious ‘viewers’ who “ran into some content ‘by accident’ and are concerned, not for themselves, but on behalf of other, more vulnerable people”, and yet leave thousands and thousands of real consumers open to persistent fraud, demonstrates that the regulatory system doesn’t work for the greater good or anything like it."
agree with this light entertainment, ofcom seem hellbent on protecting those who never watch the babeshows ie under 18's yet dont protect those that do as some shows as you say do swindle people that watch. regarding the "people" that do complain i agree too that its always on behalf of other people. also lots of these "people" are actually rival babeshows.
but ofcom do have rules which have to be followed and bang didnt follow them (broke them 60 times in 18 months) and have only have themselves to blame for their current situation. i do believe that bangbabes will survive in some form
a member of the Piper Niven Cult
|
|
28-11-2010 12:44 |
|
RCTV
Military Bitch
Posts: 481
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 8
|
RE: RIP Bang Babes
(28-11-2010 12:44 )Rammyrascal Wrote: "What I do think is wrong, is the logic of vehemently protecting those who never even watch the shows, whilst offering no protection whatsoever for those who do. The consumer, is, let’s face it, is open to being swindled on an almost 24/7 basis by babe channels. I’m not saying it’s all channels, but it’s certainly a number of them. And for the regulators to be unaware of this would defy belief. That the regulators can spring to the aid of one or two mysterious ‘viewers’ who “ran into some content ‘by accident’ and are concerned, not for themselves, but on behalf of other, more vulnerable people”, and yet leave thousands and thousands of real consumers open to persistent fraud, demonstrates that the regulatory system doesn’t work for the greater good or anything like it."
agree with this light entertainment, ofcom seem hellbent on protecting those who never watch the babeshows ie under 18's yet dont protect those that do as some shows as you say do swindle people that watch. regarding the "people" that do complain i agree too that its always on behalf of other people. also lots of these "people" are actually rival babeshows.
but ofcom do have rules which have to be followed and bang didnt follow them (broke them 60 times in 18 months) and have only have themselves to blame for their current situation. i do believe that bangbabes will survive in some form
I agree with that, but will say as someone who has working in the uk industry under 18s do watch, phone and text the shows and lie about their age, it is obvious at times. I do agree about rival babe shows though, they did when I was in the industry and no doubt they still do.
RAMOS
...Yes I'm female!
Production Professional with PhD
|
|
28-11-2010 12:48 |
|
mrichie10
Banned
Posts: 1,452
Joined: Oct 2010
|
RE: RIP Bang Babes
wow what a load of long politically correct speeches about ofcom, they must be loving themselves i.e cocky as fook right now with all the attention they getting from the forum, they screw us by taking away two stations with some of the hottest babes me personally wouldn't waste my time and effort on them!
|
|
28-11-2010 13:36 |
|
mr williams
Still Missing Roxy :(
Posts: 8,070
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 150
|
RE: RIP Bang Babes
follow me on twitter @mrwilliamsforum
(This post was last modified: 28-11-2010 14:12 by mr williams.)
|
|
28-11-2010 14:09 |
|
TheWatcher
Ex Moderator
Posts: 10,497
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 221
|
|
28-11-2010 17:36 |
|