Ofcom Discussion

Interesting speech from the new President of the Society of Editors, Robin Esser, executive managing editor of the Daily Mail, called for broadcast regulator Ofcom to be scrapped and for the industry to regulate itself.

Quote:The new president of the Society of Editors has called for broadcast regulator Ofcom to be scrapped and for the industry to regulate itself.

Giving his inaugural address at the Society of Editors conference in Glasgow today, Robin Esser, also executive managing editor of the Daily Mail, said there is no longer a case for official regulation of television.

"The UK government could save a lot of taxpayers' money by abolishing the broadcast regulator, Ofcom altogether and encouraging a system of self-regulation which the industry itself should pay for," he said.

"Matters of cross ownership, plurality and media domination - such as the Murdoch bid to take total control of Sky - can and should be dealt with by the Competition Commission which was created to investigate just this sort of problem. There is even a European Competition Commission – how many more bodies do we need at our expense to sort this important matter out?

"Statutory regulation of TV was based on the limited availability of bandwidth which created the need for licences. Today licences for journalism should have no place in a modern democratic society.

"Ofcom's annual budget is £143 million – much of it being taxpayer's money - and they currently employ 873 people. The Press Complaint Commission's annual budget is under £2 million and they employ 15 and a half people! The tax payers' contribution to the PCC is nil!

"All these restrictions on the media in Britain send out the wrong message abroad, encouraging control of the news in other parts of the world and bringing comfort to those who wish to keep their populations in ignorance."

During his speech, Esser also outlined the main plans the Society of Editors has for the future, which include the monitoring of attempts to cap lawyer's success fees, the libel law reform and privacy law development.

"So far the coalition has talked a good game," he said. "We must ensure that the talk becomes a reality.

"Our watchfulness has to go beyond government though. As the Olympics draw near sports authorities are trying to extend their control over the way sports events are reported by the national, regional and local papers and by the TV networks.

"Already we have had suggestions that clubs will try to control what pictures are taken of events and issue their own carefully edited images to bolster their sponsors and burnish their own reputations.

"We have made great progress with ACPO and co-operation between the police and the media. But we must keep up the pressure in this area too.

"Vigilance on all these issues and many others which restrict the public's right to know, will be our watchword."

Interesting speech but the only way forward for ofcom to be abolished is to lobby the mp's to put pressure on the government because yes censorship is this country does send out the wrong message to the rest of the world. Before we as a nation can criticise China for their draconian censorship laws which are way more stricter than ours we have to set the example first. As a free nation such as ours we should have the basic right such as freedom of choice. The babe channels are not serving the purpose in which they are intended to do so and that has to stop. I'm of the opinion that the watershed rule should still stand however because the babe channels can be switched on and off via the parental control button then the restrictions currently in place should be abolished and as for the rest of the channels on the epg I think if it's anything of an adult nature the four digit pin number should be used to access the channel. Just for the record the odd's of anybody guessing a four digit pin number is 1 in 10,000 and with only 3 attempts that should be suffice to meet all UK requirements.

The executive managing editor of the Daily Mail calls for Ofcom to be abolished and only Scottishbloke notices? The Daily Mail for crying out loud.

(02-12-2010 21:26 )eccles Wrote:  The executive managing editor of the Daily Mail calls for Ofcom to be abolished and only Scottishbloke notices? The Daily Mail for crying out loud.

Not only that but Andrew Neil, presenter of the political review programme This Week gave a shoutout tonight for Babestation saying people should keep warm and huddle around their TV's watching. Perhaps when Ofcoms comm's office sent out their media press release concerning their heavy handed enforcement of Bang these editors took umbrage and discussed it at their weekly lunch meeting at The Ivy. Whats wrong with writing a letter to the editor supporting his stance against Ofcom, momentum can be a dangerous power.

I can see why ofcom is there, but the regs need changing massively.

I find it weird how you can show one girl sucking another girls breasts but you cant show a solo girl holding open her own pussy.

(04-12-2010 17:50 )Ellis_Dee Wrote:  I find it weird how you can show one girl sucking another girls breasts but you cant show a solo girl holding open her own pussy.

Really??

I would personally love to see a newsnight special hosted by Jeremy Paxman where all the chiefs from the babe channels and the chief executive from Ofcom debate the matter live on tv. Ofcom need to be challenged as they have a lot to answer for. And another thing is could bribery be the reason why Ofcom haven't really targeted any other channels other than Bangbabes. We need answers now and also justification in why they deem certain things taboo.

(03-12-2010 10:56 )RCTV Wrote:  I can see why ofcom is there, but the regs need changing massively.

I, too, see the need for a TV regulator. However, in Ofcon's case, their attitude to ALL the sex channels is totally disproportionative.

What are they frightened of?

(04-12-2010 19:19 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  I would personally love to see a newsnight special hosted by Jeremy Paxman where all the chiefs from the babe channels and the chief executive from Ofcom debate the matter live on tv. Ofcom need to be challenged as they have a lot to answer for. And another thing is could bribery be the reason why Ofcom haven't really targeted any other channels other than Bangbabes. We need answers now and also justification in why they deem certain things taboo.

When you consider that some channels can't be bothered to supply compliance tapes when they are requested, then Ofcom would win the TV debate by default, being the only ones who actually bothered to show up.