Babestation OSG

I shouldn't complain as i know its not her fault, its Babestations but i know she winds up a lot of people on here.

The girls are just doing what their cretinous employers tell them to, but for some reason a lot of people seem to react worse to Geri than to the others. It depends on your attitude to the individual girl. I've been a pushover for Geri since I first saw her two years ago, so she doesn't personally annoy me, but on the other hand I've found Dani excruciating on the two nights she's just done. One man's meat, etc . . .

(19-01-2011 02:08 )vila Wrote:  The girls are just doing what their cretinous employers tell them to, but for some reason a lot of people seem to react worse to Geri than to the others. It depends on your attitude to the individual girl. I've been a pushover for Geri since I first saw her two years ago, so she doesn't personally annoy me, but on the other hand I've found Dani excruciating on the two nights she's just done. One man's meat, etc . . .

I agree 100%. I have joked about Geri before but she really doesn't bother me and she is by far the best presenter imo, she attempts to be as enthusiastic as possible and Dani is far worse, its quite cringe worthy when Dani is presenting and very arkward imo.
I think people on here get annoyed by the presenters (deservedly so at times) but its not their fault at the end of the day.

It's all directed for them by their pesky employers, I support vila too on this one. We really need to set the ball rolling and send our pm posts thick and fast to babestation in the form of complaints otherwise they will think that they are in the comfort zone, which they aren't.

FAVOURITE BABES

| 1: PAIGE TYLER | 2: SOPHIA KNIGHT | 3: GRACIE LEWIS | 4: CHARLIE O'NEAL | 5: ANASTASIA HARRIS | 6: ADELE TAYLOR | 7: TAMMY TAYLOR | 8: ROSIE LEE | 9: CAITLIN WYNTERS | 10: ELLA JOLIE |

(19-01-2011 02:20 )ledders69 Wrote:  It's all directed for them by their pesky employers, I support vila too on this one. We really need to set the ball rolling and send our pm posts thick and fast to babestation in the form of complaints otherwise they will think that they are in the comfort zone, which they aren't.

I'm in but they already know to be honest. They no doub't chek this forum out but that hasn't changed anything and it won't untill the number of calls/viewers drop.
There is a lot of members on this forum overall but the amount of Babestation users is small and miniscule compared to to the 300,000+ daily Babestation viewers that there probably are.
Nothing will be changed until Babestation do something that pisses off a LOT of viewers.

(19-01-2011 02:35 )Mastes1 Wrote:  

(19-01-2011 02:20 )ledders69 Wrote:  It's all directed for them by their pesky employers, I support vila too on this one. We really need to set the ball rolling and send our pm posts thick and fast to babestation in the form of complaints otherwise they will think that they are in the comfort zone, which they aren't.

I'm in but they already know to be honest. They no doub't chek this forum out but that hasn't changed anything and it won't untill the number of calls/viewers drop.
There is a lot of members on this forum overall but the amount of Babestation users is small and miniscule compared to to the 300,000+ daily Babestation viewers that there probably are.
Nothing will be changed until Babestation do something that pisses off a LOT of viewers.

couldn`t agree more.
What is needed is for the ones that fone up to tell the girls it will be the last time they will be phoning until they can see an uninterupted screen.i.e no stupid black boxes.
Only then might the arseholes in production take note and get rid of this stupid annoying osg !

the 20minutes i saw on freeview with lucy z had more adverts than itv, geri butting in, osg taking up nearly half of the screen, lucy z reduced to a little box and on the wrong set. their webstream is the same, other channels dont osg on their streams.

There are two boxes on GC at the minute. The top one has a message saying "Look at that bum!", in reference to the picture in the box below of Paige. But where is the black box of censorship on the photo? Why, over her bum of course

(19-01-2011 13:25 )nailpouchofmine Wrote:  couldn`t agree more.
What is needed is for the ones that fone up to tell the girls it will be the last time they will be phoning until they can see an uninterupted screen.i.e no stupid black boxes.
Only then might the arseholes in production take note and get rid of this stupid annoying osg !

This emphasises part of the problem with this argument as far as Sellcast are concerned.
Presumably from your statement you don't call. It seems that a fair percentage of the comments in this thread are from non-participating posters. Why would Cellcast listen to anyone who does not give their business some income?
Yes as a caller you preferably want to see the girl you are talking to, it is the call itself that you are bothered about more though.
Cellcast as you rightly say will only change if calls take a significant dip but I doubt this forum has that power. I have been told by a couple of girls that the membership on here accounts for a small percentage of actual callers. That fact if true sadly weakens any argument