Danica - Chat & Discussion

(28-01-2011 06:40 )RRROGER Wrote:  The fanboys will no doubt take a pop at me, but Danica needs to raise her game significantly; my thoughts on last night's show, as mrmann said, she looked tired, she also looked bored, she looked dowdy (lank hair).

The rest of the posting on her show was in the form of "polite applause", or in a lot of cases a "slow handclap."

I would not say I am a fanboy but she certainly does not need to raise her game.Not sure what you expect her to do that she ain't doing already.These channels are all in rehab since the demise of Bang.She brings something different let's just deal with what she represents.

yeah i agree whit most comments, she was good but i know she can do much better. would have loved to see more of that sexy ass she has. but other than that good show.

I felt last night was an improvement on Sunday's performance. Had more movement, liked the wet t-shirt, liked the teasing with the pantys. Not sure amount the dank hair though....was that deliberate, strange if it was?

Danica always leaves us with mixed feelings, she could go on and deliver a lot more and the hopeful wait patiently, whereas others I fear may just walk away frustrated.

Dank hair?

Thought Danica had a good night,looked gorgeous and nice to see her trying something different. She was busy on the 'phones as per last time and although I would have liked to see another outfit I can understand why she didn't change.

It's really good to see her on more frequently and I'm looking forward to seeing what she does on Tuesday. Prehaps something new again...naked

(28-01-2011 13:53 )gazfc Wrote:  Dank hair?

Is that a query of my post...???
... the word I used was LANK; Oxford Dictionary defininition...long/limp/straight & looked greasy & untidy; as I posted she looked dowdy, bleary eyed, that just got out of bed look....she's supposed to be a mainstream glam model for fuck sake, but apart from being pretty, she looked very ordinary.

(28-01-2011 14:54 )RRROGER Wrote:  Is that a query of my post...???
... the word I used was LANK; Oxford Dictionary defininition...long/limp/straight & looked greasy & untidy; as I posted she looked dowdy, bleary eyed, that just got out of bed look....she's supposed to be a mainstream glam model for fuck sake, but apart from being pretty, she looked very ordinary.

RRROGER has danica knocked you back in the past or something fella, as you are starting to get very personal and its becoming out of order in my opinon, you need to tone it down a touch.

Well said chrislatimer,RRROGER has this woman done something to upset you,the way you talk about her you would think she was an absolute grenade!not probably the prettiest girl these channels have ever witnessed.


Your comments are way off and make no sense at all.

Sorry, I meant to say lank. I have to support RRROGER in as much as, her hair was exactly as he stated limp/greasy in appearance and untidy.

In Danica's defense though, she must have been going for the "just got out of bed" look. Which took me somewhat by surprise as she's always looks stunning in makeup etc. It does show that she's naturally beautiful though.

I did like the obvious shyness & blushing whenever she started to slide her panties down.

(28-01-2011 16:18 )Cpe Wrote:  Sorry, I meant to say lank. I have to support RRROGER in as much as, her hair was exactly as he stated limp/greasy in appearance and untidy.

In Danica's defense though, she must have been going for the "just got out of bed" look. Which took me somewhat by surprise as she's always looks stunning in makeup etc. It does show that she's naturally beautiful though.

I did like the obvious shyness & blushing whenever she started to slide her panties down.

I don't agree with all this talk of looking tired with greasy hair - all a bit mean. I think she looked stunning last night. She can look a bit washed out sometimes if she wears that latex shite and the lighting is pants, but last night as is the case 99% of the time she looked top banana.