Babestation OSG

I know simply complaining about how bad the graphics are is a bit redundant, but tonight has been especially dire.

Two boxes on screen, one proclaiming "Girl Caller! Girl Caller! Girl Caller! Girl Caller! Girl Caller! Girl Caller! Girl Caller! Girl Caller! Girl Caller!", and the other? The exact same thing, just differently worded. At another point, the lower box informed us that the girl on screen was using cream on herself. Unless mrmann was watching, I think most of the audience would have assumed that was what the white liquid covering Louise's tits was

(23-03-2011 18:42 )Ally4Paige Wrote:  

(22-03-2011 22:31 )Dan Volatile Wrote:  They have graphics boffins toiling twenty-four seven to to improve their OSGs and it's clearly paying dividends.
]

What graphics boffins? If this is the stuff produced by what passes for graphics boffins they are quite clearly useless at their job and should be fired FORTHWITH!!

It's actually quite hard to build a graphics system from the ground up.

I'd like to think I'm not that useless at my job.

OSG, Dont you just hate it when the babe know's what she's doing but the osg get's in the way. I was watching Tammy last night and man was she stunning, she deliberately and seductively pumped her hips and flashed her thong, Tammy was on a call at the time and I assume the punter had asked her to do this, you know, wiggle a bit, flash that thong babe, lol, oh hell!! them osg's " drat and triple drat " calling cash is, good calling cash!!! if I'm calling and asking and the osg's mean I'm not getting, then I'm not calling You know ?

(23-03-2011 18:09 )rawr1 Wrote:  

(09-03-2011 10:51 )babestation Wrote:  ...I have a feeling that what they do and what you think they should do are unlikely to ever match.

I have a feeling that if you employ monkeys for peanuts you get shit thrown all over your screen...

Seriously, who in their right mind thinks that is the best approach to attract men into calling a gorgeous girl?

You guys at Cellcast HQ are gonna have to do more than interject with "our hands are tied but we've passed the message on" nonspeak and phoney "design our new OSG!" competitions to keep the "moaners" quiet I'm afraid

We've never said we want to keep the moaners quiet, I think we can all agree that's impossible. You guys can moan and say whatever you see fit, it's a public forum.

What I'm saying is that we can't do any better than passing your message on, and when it comes to the people that speak on here as "babestation" our hands are tied. Who do you think we are? Do you think we're managers, production managers and producers, as well as graphics, engineers and the web guys?

Believe me, pictures like that one with the girl caller covering the girl, and the Ree one's above, they perplex us just as much as you. And we forwarded those images onto the MD with our concerns.

Just because we represent Babestation on here, don't think we don't agree with you sometimes, and also don't think we can do a thing about it, because ultimately, we can't.

(24-03-2011 14:19 )babestation Wrote:  What I'm saying is that we can't do any better than passing your message on, and when it comes to the people that speak on here as "babestation" our hands are tied. Who do you think we are? Do you think we're managers, production managers and producers, as well as graphics, engineers and the web guys?
*SNIP*
Just because we represent Babestation on here
*SNIP*

So, in all seriousness, what exactly do the users of the "babestation" account do? If all you do is post the schedules to twitter/facebook and upload the website preview pictures on here I would suggest you're very lucky in your job

I for one certainly would'nt criticize those who do the hard work to make Babestation possible, but I suppose in the bigger scheme of thing, what dictates all outcomes is pounds,shillings and pence and rightly so, if its a profit making business. Constructive criticism can only be a good thing, and as the man said "It's a public forum" If freedom of speech were a crime we would all be guilty.

Loved the new graphics last night. Semi transparent, full screen overlaid on top of the girl on the phone for 10 or more minutes. Well done I thought they were fantastic and did a professional job in hiding that pesky young beauty on screen. I mean who really wants to see beautiful naked girls while you are calling them.....I'm guessing it must just be me.....Oh and the rest of the audience.
I'm hoping the irony was intentional too. The graphics overlaid on a naked girl, live in the studio, stating " Text now to get a naked vid of this girl"!!!!!!!
Great bit of marketing that!
If you need some professional advice ever on promotion and marketing feel free to call me. I only charge £1.53 per minute with no time out after 19 minutes and 59 seconds...of course it may not be me on the phone for the first 5 minutes......it might be a girl at home, waiting to take your call.

(24-03-2011 14:19 )babestation Wrote:  ...

What I'm saying is that we can't do any better than passing your message on, and when it comes to the people that speak on here as "babestation" our hands are tied. Who do you think we are? Do you think we're managers, production managers and producers, as well as graphics, engineers and the web guys?

Of course I have no idea who you are and what you do... having multiple people use the same account is a surefire way to ensure this. Why not post under individual login names, like TwistedChaz does, so we know who you are and whether you are web team, live crew, floor manager etc.?
It's an age old technique of companies who don't want to genuinely interface with their customer base to employ "faceless" login names on forums, so you'll have to excuse me if I come across a tad cynical

Believe me, pictures like that one with the girl caller covering the girl, and the Ree one's above, they perplex us just as much as you. And we forwarded those images onto the MD with our concerns.

Yep, looks pretty shite doesn't it? Your graphics guy could be Da Vinci, but with production choices like that he might as well be a a "speshul kid" drawing crayola stick men on tracing paper
7+ years of Cellcast pretty much ignoring customer feedback tells me that the MD probably won't feel like telling the producer/s how to do their job, but i'm all for optimism

Just because we represent Babestation on here, don't think we don't agree with you sometimes, and also don't think we can do a thing about it, because ultimately, we can't.

Sounds like a recipe for "human shield" to me - Start up your own user ID here and you won't have to act as the company flak magnet

I don't have much opportunity to get on here at the moment, but while I'm having a peek I just have to pass comment.

What passes for intelligence at Cellcast Command astonishes me more than ever each day. Faced with a never-ending barrage of complaints about PART of the screen being obstructed, their idea of correcting the situation is to darken the ENTIRE screen and then cover it with a message in fucking great capital letters and destroy what little chance remains of seeing the featured girl???????

Unbelievable, just unbelievable.

Christ.

(25-03-2011 15:27 )rawr1 Wrote:  

(24-03-2011 14:19 )babestation Wrote:  ...

What I'm saying is that we can't do any better than passing your message on, and when it comes to the people that speak on here as "babestation" our hands are tied. Who do you think we are? Do you think we're managers, production managers and producers, as well as graphics, engineers and the web guys?

Of course I have no idea who you are and what you do... having multiple people use the same account is a surefire way to ensure this. Why not post under individual login names, like TwistedChaz does, so we know who you are and whether you are web team, live crew, floor manager etc.?
It's an age old technique of companies who don't want to genuinely interface with their customer base to employ "faceless" login names on forums, so you'll have to excuse me if I come across a tad cynical

It's not like there are tonnes of people that write under the name Babestation, there are two, both of us web guys, we run the sites and our web presence on forums, facebook, twitter etc. We have pretty much the same views as each other about the OSG and things that happen here, so you aren't getting tonnes of different people from all over the building talking to you, just two like-minded web guys. You're never talking to producers, graphics, or anything like that. Just us. Twisted Chaz is an exception as he sits opposite us and is one of the engineers working on the new graphics system and wanted to put his views across. There's no point in the 2 people that write under Babestation having separate names as it'll just be two people saying pretty much the same thing we do anyway. It's no 'age-old' technique we're employing here, it's just makes more sense this way.

Believe me, pictures like that one with the girl caller covering the girl, and the Ree one's above, they perplex us just as much as you. And we forwarded those images onto the MD with our concerns.

Yep, looks pretty shite doesn't it? Your graphics guy could be Da Vinci, but with production choices like that he might as well be a a "speshul kid" drawing crayola stick men on tracing paper
7+ years of Cellcast pretty much ignoring customer feedback tells me that the MD probably won't feel like telling the producer/s how to do their job, but i'm all for optimism

I'm a big fan of sarcasm, ask anyone, but sarcasm and insults aren't really going to get you anywhere with us if you're after genuine information/conversation. We'll just think you're a bit of an a*se.

Just because we represent Babestation on here, don't think we don't agree with you sometimes, and also don't think we can do a thing about it, because ultimately, we can't.

Sounds like a recipe for "human shield" to me - Start up your own user ID here and you won't have to act as the company flak magnet

No point, as discussed above.