m100
Banned
Posts: 1,450
Joined: Sep 2008
|
RE: best and worse cover versions
I've been consistently amazed at what the remaining members have been allowed to do with the queen name and music. Wonder if Freddie's estate has any say in any of it?
Thought I was the only person in Britain who can't stand Girls Aloud.
would all those wishing to take part in today's round of multiple username bingo please note emails must be submitted before 5pm
(This post was last modified: 27-02-2009 18:52 by m100.)
|
|
27-02-2009 18:51 |
|
Mister Gummidge
Professional Strawman
Posts: 2,226
Joined: Sep 2008
Reputation: 131
|
RE: best and worse cover versions
firekind Wrote:funny thing about old songs is that even shite sounds better now than most modern pop.
take spice girls for example. hated at the time but compair their songs with the unmemorable pish girls aloud release and you cant even put both groups in the same league...
Funnily enough I feel the exact same way, only in reverse. I quite like some of Girls Aloud's stuff, but the Spice Girls make me want to go out and kick puppy dogs... Different stroke for different folks, eh?
m100 Wrote:I've been consistently amazed at what the remaining members have been allowed to do with the queen name and music. Wonder if Freddie's estate has any say in any of it?
From what I understand, the whole band own the name Queen and the music is owned by the record company, so no consultation is required, even from the surviving members On a side note, I think that of the songs written by Freddie all of the royalties go to aids charities, so the executors of the will just look at potential revenue for the benficiaries, there are very few shit covers of the stuff written by any of the other three...
"You say sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. I say that I tailor my jokes to the audience..."
|
|
27-02-2009 19:21 |
|
mozza
Master Poster
Posts: 661
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 69
|
RE: best and worse cover versions
|
|
28-02-2009 18:45 |
|
$h!ny h3lm3t
* annaholic *
Posts: 2,041
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 60
|
RE: best and worse cover versions
If your dying day is near, spend it with a can of beer.
When the angels start to call, make sure you`ve drunk it all.
(This post was last modified: 28-02-2009 19:01 by $h!ny h3lm3t.)
|
|
28-02-2009 18:52 |
|
$h!ny h3lm3t
* annaholic *
Posts: 2,041
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 60
|
RE: best and worse cover versions
If your dying day is near, spend it with a can of beer.
When the angels start to call, make sure you`ve drunk it all.
(This post was last modified: 28-02-2009 19:09 by $h!ny h3lm3t.)
|
|
28-02-2009 18:58 |
|
mozza
Master Poster
Posts: 661
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 69
|
RE: best and worse cover versions
|
|
28-02-2009 19:04 |
|
Shandy
.
Posts: 3,480
Joined: Jan 2009
|
RE: best and worse cover versions
Without a doubt, Johnny Cash's cover of nine inch nails' Hurt is more the a good cover, it outshines the orignal by miles! Moreso when you watchbthe video knowing it was filmed so close to the death of his wife as well as his own.
Also, I have to say leona lewis' version of run is really good, best cover of the last coupla years.
|
|
28-02-2009 19:06 |
|
$h!ny h3lm3t
* annaholic *
Posts: 2,041
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 60
|
RE: best and worse cover versions
If your dying day is near, spend it with a can of beer.
When the angels start to call, make sure you`ve drunk it all.
(This post was last modified: 28-02-2009 19:20 by $h!ny h3lm3t.)
|
|
28-02-2009 19:11 |
|
mozza
Master Poster
Posts: 661
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 69
|
RE: best and worse cover versions
|
|
28-02-2009 19:14 |
|