3 shows a night, so why use the same set for each?
Does using the same set 3 times save money? No? Then lets have 1 well lit shower scene and no more, 1 open legged close up on the bed and 1 other, perhaps the kitchen/loo/back alley/stairs/mixing desk.
Live shows should be about live sex, even if it cant be shown AND explicit genital shots. These are not mutually exclusive, one show can keep fans of both satisfied.
Softcore content has no place on the channel.
At the very least the live sex element should feature lots of vigorous toy insertion (even if we arent allowed to see it). And why stop at fingers and dildos? Show some imagination, act out some fantasies, put the phone up there and dial it, use a snooker cue, a babysham bottle, a stiletto heel, a string of beads. Squirt cream up there and squeeze it out.
The live sex sessions should be genuine, unrestrained and noisy, NOT lethargically working through a tick list of positions 30 seconds at a time.
Some of us like the girl-girl sessions, but a lot of the action cant be shown. Some of us prefer solo action we get to see more fanny shots. Realistically if 2 presenters are booked for 1 girl-girl session they will expect to be paid for the whole evening, not just 30 minutes, so the choice is an evening of girl-girl or solo, not half and half. Fine, but make sure you do some of each every week.
Vary the girl-girl content. Dont have 3 identical acts in an evening.
Set 1 - 2 fully naked babes take turns pleasuring each other.
Set 2 - The Medical Exam. Both start fully clothed, one gets stripped and examined in detail by the other. As it is a pre-Wedding medical her reproductive equipment and orgasmic capacity is tested.
Set 3 - One babe dominates the other, strap on and face sitting included.
Dont like those? How about testing different sex toys?
The Symbian?
Get the crew in shot for a visible audience?
Or one set could be phone in requests.
If a babe is up to it, how about POV?
Since the channel is allowed to show genuine boy-girl sex in recorded shows, including cum shots (provided the erect penis is not shown), why not have the occasional live boy-girl show? Careful camera work would be required, with the camera above the waist much of the time, but it could work. And if they were a genuine couple a lot of potential criticism would be deflected.
THESE CHANNELS CAN DO A LOT MORE even in the current censorship climate WITHOUT IT COSTING MORE TO PRODUCE. What they cant do without risking their licence is show genital contact.
By the way, if you do not like the current censorship climate be sure to sign to e-petition to lay off the Babe channels. Make sure you click the confirmation email, or your vote wont be counted. An address and any genuine UK postcode is required plus your email address for confirmation. Its free. Its confidential. Its quick.
http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/13222
Dont bother if you are happy for Ofcom to tighten the rules every few months.