Asian Babes - Chat & Discussion

(16-10-2011 15:45 )mr mystery Wrote:  Just been checking out "IndustryInsider's" profile and all the posts he/she has made , i found he/she has only ever made posts in threads of channels owned by "Satelite Entertainment Limited" the owners of the Sport xxx and Asian babes channels , he/she gave hints in the Sport xxx threads last year that the Sport channels were about to start up again this turned out to be true , he/she also made a post concerning maintenance work on the Sport channels , see below , both quotes below made in the Sport xxx thread

These posts lead me into thinking "IndustryInsider" is giving out the correct information and that Asian babes will indeed be starting up again next week after all .

Just aheads up for the mods , IndustryInsider looks to be a channel rep of some sort so should his/her user name be changed from the common user name of blue to the Maroon colour of a channel rep ?.

Blimey, mr mystery, even Holmes would be impressed with all that! Anyway, I hope you're right.

(16-10-2011 14:45 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  Stan what started it all off was Addison quoted my post and changed Asian Babes to Babestar TV for a wind up...

So he wasn't really suggesting Babestar was as bad as Asian Babes? That's a relief. I do like Asian Babes, but Babestar will never be bettered on the fta front!

^^ You've already told us this, mr mystery, hence my post above yours. Premature senility?

(17-10-2011 01:26 )StanTheMan Wrote:  ^^ You've already told us this, mr mystery, hence my post above yours. Premature senility?

What post would this be then ? , i've only mentioned what i did in 1 post , you've not had 1 to many and are seeing things are you ? lol .
I was just explaining in my now removed post how i came across "IndustyInsiders" Sport xxx posts while checking out other threads in the Sport sections and hadn't originally set out to do some sort investigation into his/her profile that's all , so after reading his/hers Sport xxx posts became curious and checked out his/hers profile and rightly or wrongly deduced that "IndustryInsider" is a employee of Satellite Entertainment Limited the owners of the channels that both the Sport xxx and Asian babes shows used to transmit on , so in my view information given by IndustryInsider concerning the Asian babes should be taken seriously , i actually thought he/she was a nutter at first from reading post made in this thread , it wasn't until a saw the posts made in the Sport threads that i changed my opinion and now think what he/she posts could be accurate , so that's why i said what i did in my previous post .

(17-10-2011 10:26 )mr mystery Wrote:  

(17-10-2011 01:26 )StanTheMan Wrote:  ^^ You've already told us this, mr mystery, hence my post above yours. Premature senility?

What post would this be then ? , i've only mentioned what i did in 1 post , you've not had 1 to many and are seeing things are you ? lol .

What the fuck??? Something weird's going on here. Last night, I quoted a post of yours on this page, that was saying the same as your post on page 37 (post #366) - now it's gone. However, when I checked back a page, I find you have said the same thing twice (posts #366 and then again in post #370). They're not double posts like sometimes happens, they're separate posts, but post 370 is just repeating what you already said in post 366.

(17-10-2011 11:56 )StanTheMan Wrote:   What the fuck??? Something weird's going on here. Last night, I quoted a post of yours on this page, that was saying the same as your post on page 37 (post #366) - now it's gone. However, when I checked back a page, I find you have said the same thing twice (posts #366 and then again in post #370). They're not double posts like sometimes happens, they're separate posts, but post 370 is just repeating what you already said in post 366.

Posts 366 and 370 of mine don't look the same to me , in fact they are totally different and i'm not repeating what i said in post 366 in post 370 . However i made a fuck up somewhere last night with a post i made , i have deleted my post that didn't come out right which is what you may have seen , but it shouldn't have been a repeat of a previous post i made , i was quoting a bit from a post from another thread and quoting and editing a bit from one of my post on this thread , i posted it without checking how it had came out as i was in a bit of a hurry last night , so i saw yours and my post this morning so thought it didn't make sense and deleted it , i wasn't being serious when i asked if you were seeing things lol .

(16-10-2011 13:02 )StanTheMan Wrote:  [D]idn't I read on this thread recently, someone saying that all your negative points regarding the channel were actually the same as his, but directed at Babestar? Who was it that made such a ridiculous comment? It baffles me to think that anyone could consider Babestar as anything other than the greatest and bravest Babe channel we've ever had.

(16-10-2011 14:45 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  Stan what started it all off was Addison quoted my post and changed Asian Babes to Babestar TV for a wind up which I have again been on record as saying that Babestar TV was probably the greatest ever channel ever to hit SKY, the same however cannot be said of Asian Babes and I will still stand by my comments that Asian Babes was the exact opposite and will probably go down in history as the worst ever babe channel to hit the SKY EPG. I hope it never returns, it was dreadful.

You two share a stance. Good for you! But some don't share it.

Babestar was useless for a number of reasons, technical and presentational. Its poor resolution picture was lousy; equal to the worst there's ever been. This was buttressed by gormless camerawork, meant to be edgily voyeuristic and 'creative' but in reality just a disorientating eye-fuck. The whole sorry farrago was topped off by that awful superimposed backdrop, simultaneously hilarious and depressing.

Babestar's 'sinning Catholic' framing of sex as lascivious or dirty or something that makes uppity Sally Army members spit tea all over their uniforms in moral outrage is now and forever an outdated mode for anyone who credits that we're living in an age of progressive, post 60s/sex-is-natural maturity. That sort of person is able to see beautiful, tanned, fit and healthy presenters wearing outfits they'd probably choose to wear when not in a TV studio, as sensual and fantasy-fuelling in themselves (Thank you Elite Daytime for recognising that such viewers are out there, and for continuing to fly the flag for revealing yet low-key, comfortable outfits! More power to simple tops, shorts and bare legs!) They don't have any need to see babes dolled up in pantomime boudoir costumes, or see them do yet another tedious naughty nurse Carry-On tribute act, or listen into the late shows to hear body parts or the act of sex being referred to in the crass, disparaging terms of yore, in order to have their imaginations stoked (as I've said elsewhere, you can't imagine that these words and phrases carry any sort of shock or excitement value anymore for anyone no longer hanging round the back of the bike sheds with a bad case of acne. It's just soul-destroying, dead slang; completely beside the point these days, except when used as comedy material).

It takes some doing to drain confident, enthusiastic and characterful babes such as Jada and Sammie Dee of any vestige of personality, but Babestar managed it, turning them into gyrating robots; basically the babe show equivalent of computer game caricatures. Those two only started to come into their own when Babestar's slapstick jalopy finally veered off the road and upended itself in a ditch, and they found work on classier channels.

This thread is being dragged off topic, but if people insist on coming in to dance on the grave of a channel they never rated much in the first place, then they're going to have to accept others taking a pop at some of the complacent assumptions that exist around this place, one of the most objectionable being that Babestar was somehow this great, epochal babe channel. It was nothing of the sort. It was a cartoonish, incoherent mess. Asian Babes is/was the real pioneering channel. Who'd have thought that the progressive decision to include one or two beautifully feminine transgender presenters in the line-ups would've caused so many bigoted reactionaries unable to get with the times to come scuttling out from under their rocks!

Different strokes, an' all that.

(16-10-2011 15:45 )mr mystery Wrote:  These posts lead me into thinking "IndustryInsider" is giving out the correct information and that Asian babes will indeed be starting up again next week after all .

In P. G. Wodehouse's Right Ho, Jeeves, 1934: "He should have had sense enough to see that he was"... what?

So it's now happening on a day of which Lisa Loring would be most proud.

Is that cryptic enough!!? Probably not. xx

is it back tomorrow or not?

FFS...

Yes it appears that the show will be back tomorrow, Wednesday. A more interesting question is whether any members of the Thai Police will feature on the show this time.

(17-10-2011 19:32 )IndustryInsider Wrote:  In P. G. Wodehouse's Right Ho, Jeeves, 1934: "He should have had sense enough to see that he was"... what?

So it's now happening on a day of which Lisa Loring would be most proud.

Is that cryptic enough!!? Probably not. xx

I hope I'm not 'throwing a spanner into the works' by asking, if it is back on Wednesday, any clue as to what channel number it will be on?