Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

Kandi and Paige should leave Babestation and let Lolly and Lori take up most the night that way if they were on a new channel we would get to see them a lot more and interuption about BSX can be a pain especially if one of your fave babes are on! definitely every girl should have equal time and no girl should be higher than any other

They bought her in because they know she will make them money and while shes making them profits shes not making Elite money simples.

(29-12-2011 11:25 )HannahsPet Wrote:  They bought her in because they know she will make them money and while shes making them profits shes not making Elite money simples.

Yeah, maybe you're right. Maybe Kandi, for instance, doesn't make them any money.

I doubt even Lolly could make them money though, sat in the changing room.

(29-12-2011 13:44 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  

(29-12-2011 11:25 )HannahsPet Wrote:  They bought her in because they know she will make them money and while shes making them profits shes not making Elite money simples.

Yeah, maybe you're right. Maybe Kandi, for instance, doesn't make them any money.

I doubt even Lolly could make them money though, sat in the changing room.

if she is going to be putting performances like last night on then who cares ,i can hardly see candi or paige doing any thing like that kind of show,nothing against them but their shows are tame by comparison,maybe a new shift of between 8 and 10 should be introduced for the girls not quite so energetic ?

no they dont need to do that shankey. babestation would be boring and would loose viewers and calls if they just had energetic babes like lori on. they have to have babes on who arent as energetic as lori as not everyone likes energetic babes like lori

if bs wants to get back to its best they need to have a good mix of babes on each night, reduce the osg's, ditch the mic girls, reduce the plugs for bs xtreme and stop certain babes hogging the channels like lori and lolly do

(29-12-2011 14:23 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  no they dont need to do that shankey. babestation would be boring and would loose viewers and calls if they just had energetic babes like lori on. they have to have babes on who arent as energetic as lori as not everyone likes energetic babes like lori

if bs wants to get back to its best they need to have a good mix of babes on each night, reduce the osg's, ditch the mic girls, reduce the plugs for bs xtreme and stop certain babes hogging the channels like lori and lolly do

i agree to a certain extent ,but you must admit that certain girls are unlikely to be as raunchy i think is the word to use in their performances,i mean i dont think i have ever seen candi who i think is a gorgeous babe naked covered in oil, paige might show the odd bare arse but that is not very often,and that is why the show was losing viewers in the first place because of the tameness of the shows

Because what they are looking for is a replacement for BS Blue rather than launch another channel. Personally I would rather have Sexstation in that slot but apparantly that is not the route Cellcast is going down prefering Masti and Dirty Wives.

(29-12-2011 00:00 )bytor Wrote:  I really cannot fathom why BS dont apply for spare channels in order to screen dirty wives and masti nights. Those shows do nothing at all for me and it bugs me that they are on at the expense of a BS channel. The BS channels just cannot cope with 2 channels and lolly, the twins, Camilla et al. I suppose they could put those girls on their own channel though and cater for their fans...BS Groundhog TV might just work.

(29-12-2011 14:32 )mikedafc Wrote:  Because what they are looking for is a replacement for BS Blue rather than launch another channel. Personally I would rather have Sexstation in that slot but apparantly that is not the route Cellcast is going down prefering Masti and Dirty Wives.

(29-12-2011 00:00 )bytor Wrote:  I really cannot fathom why BS dont apply for spare channels in order to screen dirty wives and masti nights. Those shows do nothing at all for me and it bugs me that they are on at the expense of a BS channel. The BS channels just cannot cope with 2 channels and lolly, the twins, Camilla et al. I suppose they could put those girls on their own channel though and cater for their fans...BS Groundhog TV might just work.

wonder how they work out if they are a sucess viewer figures or call rates hope its not Viewers because the number of times i pressed on 909 by habit only to flick over the channel

whats the point of having sexstation if its just like the webstream it will just be another load of porn stars who cant do what they want because producers wont let them go as far because of the license and offcom.

think the sexstation idea died a death after 2 shows

(29-12-2011 14:23 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  babestation would be boring and would loose viewers and calls if they just had energetic babes like lori on. they have to have babes on who arent as energetic as lori as not everyone likes energetic babes like lori

Can't have girls making an effort now, can we?

(29-12-2011 14:29 )shankey! Wrote:  

(29-12-2011 14:23 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  no they dont need to do that shankey. babestation would be boring and would loose viewers and calls if they just had energetic babes like lori on. they have to have babes on who arent as energetic as lori as not everyone likes energetic babes like lori

if bs wants to get back to its best they need to have a good mix of babes on each night, reduce the osg's, ditch the mic girls, reduce the plugs for bs xtreme and stop certain babes hogging the channels like lori and lolly do

i agree to a certain extent ,but you must admit that certain girls are unlikely to be as raunchy i think is the word to use in their performances,i mean i dont think i have ever seen candi who i think is a gorgeous babe naked covered in oil, paige might show the odd bare arse but that is not very often,and that is why the show was losing viewers in the first place because of the tameness of the shows

Perhaps you are new to the channels. Just go back a year to 18 months and the girls you mention as being tame plus many others were giving raunchier shows. Yes certain girls do push boundaries more and I am always happy to have varied girls on tv but bouncing up and down like a demonised tigger does not make them raunchy-it makes them energetic. Taking her knickers off doesn't make a girl raunchier, it makes her naked;as she cannot show anything explicit it sort of means she lies on her belly or employs the hand thong.
What seems to be forgotten is the girls are employed to talk dirty to callers. Anyone just viewing and not actually calling might feel a little disappointed, though if terribly disappointed there is always that internet thing. Plenty of raunchy girls on there I believe catering for every taste and if you wish for a raunchy view and a hot call combined they even have cam shows to entertain you.
I have to agree with Rammy and say the girls themselves are not the issue-its the shoddy, lack of direction, crap OSG and half wit interuptions that are ruining the shows in my opinion.