James Bond Vs Jason Bourne.

Steven Seagal would own them both

seagal is a b-movie legend, although contrary to that he did do a couple of big budget movies,

as much as i like james bond, i was always keen to see the bourne films at the cinema and was never dissapointed, daniel craig in my opinion, has a farmers face, and hasnt impressed me as bond yet,

so bourne all the way

Bourne would definitely win dirty or not, mind you craig as Bond would run him close!

My vote put it to 50/50, I am going to say Bond, just because of how ludicrous some of the shit he has done has been in comparison to the much more realistic Bourne.

recently watched the bourn films back 2 back and they are all the same fooking film, you can run them side by side and the chases are in the same place, the fights are to, then the plot twists. ists so predictable it turned 3 good films into predictable shit.
as for bond well im in the same boat as others, not sure about craige but he seems to be the right guy for todays bond.

We all know after countless cheesy films that James Bond can't be defeated. It just goes against logic to think that anyone (even Superman) would be able to defeat him. He's defeated villians with laser guns and bombs ect, whilst at the same time slipping fit women a portion. He's even come back from the dead to win a poker match (classic). James Bond is just simply someone that we all wanted to be growing up, not Jason Bore.

Therefore, James Bond wins in my opinion.