arron88
Junior Poster
Posts: 84
Joined: Sep 2008
Reputation: 4
|
RE: Lucy Summers - Discussion (Non-Babeshow)
|
|
29-01-2012 16:07 |
|
continental19
Posting Machine
Posts: 1,260
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 38
|
RE: Lucy Summers - Discussion (Non-Babeshow)
Ok, i´ve noticed some remarks!! regarding my last post, i want to make it clear to everyone that in no way am i condoning what Kirsty did, fraud is a very serious offence, it´s that simple. Someone commented on my post and said quite rightly, would i have been so supportive for other benefit cheats? Well my honest answer to that would be no. Look what she has done is very serious indeed and no one needs to tell her that, lets face it the whole nation know´s what she´s done.
At least she realises what she has done, and she wants to put the matter right by paying the 500 pounds a month in otherwords pay her debt to society and eventually move on.
As i mentioned before in my last post it´s all to easy to kick someone while there down, and i´m not one of them. It reminds me a bit when i was at school, after a fight the loser is down in the ground, and for good measure a couple of other kids decide to put the boot in, and thats not right. I dare say in my lifetime i might make a monumental F**kup and the last thing i would want is people to kick me while i´m down.
At the end of the day Kirsty has brought this all on herself, and she know´s that, i just hope that the judge will allow her to pay off her Debt to society.
(This post was last modified: 29-01-2012 21:55 by continental19.)
|
|
29-01-2012 21:53 |
|
Scottishbloke
Banned
Posts: 8,304
Joined: Jan 2010
|
RE: Lucy Summers - Discussion (Non-Babeshow)
In reference to gazfc and his 2 quotes coming from me, pay no attention to that as his point is utter nonsense and the kind of rubbish I expect to be hearing from him. For a start he used 2 quotes which were completely out of context as one was from the Elite Thread. The discussion which we are having at hand is with is the blatant under hand tactics involved in attacking Lucy Summers. She's been on this forum and has put her run of events across yet certain members are still not happy with this. Gazfc you'll use any excuse to attack my posts with is nothing short of showing yourself up as a smug and smartass individual. Lucy might have very well have cancelled her show last night because of the undue negativity which she has had. If this is the case then shame on the culprits responsible for this. Lucy has my full support and every sympathy and I hope she comes out of all of this a stronger person. Enough of the lynch mob mentality please as it's all been blown up completely over the top. Lucy has a heart of gold and should be respected by all on this forum.
|
|
29-01-2012 23:10 |
|
ExtremelyCritical
Objection!
Posts: 256
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 13
|
RE: Lucy Summers - Discussion (Non-Babeshow)
(30-01-2012 00:02 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Addison Lucy should never have been attacked in the first place
She shouldn't of stolen money in the first place either, then no one will have a reason to attack her(as you put it), it works both ways.
Quote:it was downright nasty reading through all those comments and I for one don't buy this reaction one bit. The ones responsible are the ones probably responsible for her cancelled show last night.
This thread has really made me angry to see so many who don't even know her to be playing judge and jury so quick. Sorry Addison but there is no fucking excuse whatsoever and none of the negative posts can be justified one bit
You know if there is one thing I learnt about the internet, is that everyone can/might have a different opinion regarding certain subjects.
You talk about us judging her when we don't even know her, erm so what about you blindly defending her when you don't know her either?
What if some of these posters here have had financial struggles yet failed to claim benefits when they genuinely need it? theres more than meets the eye, so it's funny how you say there's no 'excuse whatsoever' when there probably is.
|
|
30-01-2012 00:22 |
|