Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

I think with tease shows, It's quick for them to become a bit on the bland side. It's the tease shows that are unpredictable in nature that I like...the 'Will she, won't she' type show. If a girl becomes predictable in what she's going to do or show, in which case everyone knows what type of show its going to be before it starts then it's likely she won't get the potential maximum numbers in her audience but only the more loyal followers to that girl in particular. It would be nice to see some of the girls perhaps push the boundaries a bit more. God I love to see Evelyn, Cara Steel and some of the other more established day girls give one a crack. My wishful thinking cap is on now.

(02-10-2018 20:53 )Foggy Mainwaring Wrote:  

(02-10-2018 17:07 )GreenMachine Wrote:  New angle, as stated on BS thread, what about drone-cam? No need for Mr C or Mr P to get close send in the drone, hover above or zoom in close for hotter PoVs and roaming about-I think it could work and nowadays small drones are less than £50 so also save money -any takers?

Nice idea GreenMachine.
All goes well until an out of control drone goes up some poor lass's pussy.
Nice job for the medics; but Pte Godfrey's bicarbonate of soda wouldn't be of much use.

Well Obvs they'd be trained first, you can't just take it out of the box and fly it, but it would big enough to control unless the operator got a bit too excited-but as they are always saying, they are supposed to be professionals.

Weird goings on last night. At one point you could see Caty Cole on one camera but another feed was also available and you could see this scruffy looking chap carting her desk into shot and then adjusting the lighting -not sure that was supposed to happen.

(03-10-2018 10:30 )GreenMachine Wrote:  [
New angle, as stated on BS thread, what about drone-cam? No need for Mr C or Mr P to get close send in the drone, hover above or zoom in close for hotter PoVs and roaming about-I think it could work and nowadays small drones are less than £50 so also save money -any takers?

Sorry but its a ridiculous idea from a Health and Safety point of view. Flying a drone in a confined space with expensive electrical equipment a matter of a few feet away as well as staff who could be severely injured by a drone makes this a total non starter. Drones need space around them to be able to fly and some sets are only about 8x8 feet meaning the ability to fly and control a drone is seriously impacted.

Oh and the Government consultation on drone flying legislation has recently closed and whilst it sensibly focuses on drone flying outside (because that's whet they are meant for!) it does include "flying a small drone with a camera or other data collection device within 50m of people, vehicles or building" would be an offence.

^Don't you be coming round here with any of that common sense nonsense. Let's just sellotape a GoPro to a cheap drone and get on with it!

^ Got to agree with most of that. The confined spaces of a babeshow set would make this a non-starter. The criminal offence bit would only apply in public spaces though, no? If a babe was carefree enough to sign up for such a thing on a large set, its a private concern only surely?

The shows could deffo do with more mobile automated cameras controlled remotely by the babes though for sure. That control needs taking out of the hands of those that prefer sitting in some office somewhere getting involved as little as possible. It a babes livilihood and reputation that depends on such things; it should be her judgement (within reason) what angles she wants to present on the TV.

Yes large drones but I am talking about really small ones which don't cost that much that practically fit in your pocket and even if you were hit by it you might get a slight graze. They are perfect for small spaces and can even be controlled via an ap on a smartphone. It's an idea anyway and more up-to-date than a large hand-held camera and you wouldn't get cables and other electrical stuff getting into the way which I reckon is more dangerous.

Some of the girls bring their dogs into work with them. How about sticking a small camera on the dog's collar and sending it in for some close-ups. It would also introduce the air of complete unpredictability that makes for a viewing sensation

I like the thought of trying something different to improve the shows but I find it quite farcical that the cameras are left un-manned at S66, you'd think it was a boring job being a cameraman there!!. If they did get off their lazy arses and did their job (and what a job by the way) we'd have better shows. Doesn't seem to be any discipline structure at S66!
I can't remember for sure but I think it was in one of Kylie Roses first shows, the camereman was brilliant giving close ups, great angles of her and it was an great show which was in large because of how good the guy behind the camera made it.

I doubt anyone would disagree with the idea of more creative use of camera technology and of course as I said in my previous post the government consultation was based upon outdoor use as they probably accept that only a complete nutcase would fly any size drone in a confined space with equipment costing thousands of pounds and people nearby.

So answer me this - who do you think would provide buildings, contents, business continuity and public liability insurance to an outfit that decided to fly a drone within 6 feet of a person in a confined space?

We rightly complain enough about the crap producers on all channels so would you want one of them flying a drone within 6 feet of you? Christ they can't even keep the bloody phones charged up so any drone would be dropping out of the air every shift