Kimmy Haze

The long grey cardigan thing with those see through shoes was unbelievably horny and the glimpses of the black underwear pure sex.

Great viewing. Loved it.

(06-06-2010 23:40 )DingDong Wrote:  The long grey cardigan thing with those see through shoes was unbelievably horny and the glimpses of the black underwear pure sex.

Great viewing. Loved it.

Fair enough, but what about her saying she wasn't going to be wearing the usual 'basic boring underwear'? It was black with rather big knickers and non-transparent... not what I was expecting from her post. See-through shoes?? I'd rather have had see-through knickers!

Maybe I was expecting too much after Ava's amazing shows, but I don't really see what everyone's getting in such a fuss about. The white all-in-one she changed into after her first break was even less revealing!

(06-06-2010 22:40 )StanTheMan Wrote:  Mmm, perhaps I missed something. Firstly, Kimmy said she wouldn't be wearing the 'basic boring underwear', but the black bra and pantie set she had on during her first stint looked about as basic as underwear comes in my opinion. When she came back after her first break, she was wearing a white all-in-one that offered absolutley zero chance of any slip-ups or flashes??

I had to leave the flat at about 16:50, so to be fair I don't know what went on after this (I have recorded it, just in case) but what I did see still had some way to go to beat Ava's recent performances.

Okay hun, I did have a figure hugging jumper over my basic underwear earlier so I wasnt in bra and undies.. to be fair.
Also babe, I am normally on the night time show so if you were after a bit of tit then you may check out the many sites I have been on that shows more than a quick flash - In the months leading up to my presence on the show I managed to get front cover in January for Escort magazine and also in Escort Swing magazine in May, I also have done and still do solo continental video and pics so I am more than capable of flashing my bits, but for the dayshow I am a tease and on the night show I aim to please. hee hee!
But I am also aware that you cant please everyone babe so thanks for your comments either way xx

Did I also mention that I have recently done 2 seperate video shoots for Babestation Extreme with the top babe Karina Currie and the stunning Jada?? No.... Well you best check it out then lol!
xx

(07-06-2010 00:16 )Kimmy Haze Wrote:  Okay hun, I did have a figure hugging jumper over my basic underwear earlier so I wasnt in bra and undies.. to be fair.
Also babe, I am normally on the night time show so if you were after a bit of tit then you may check out the many sites I have been on that shows more than a quick flash - In the months leading up to my presence on the show I managed to get front cover in January for Escort magazine and also in Escort Swing magazine in May, I also have done and still do solo continental video and pics so I am more than capable of flashing my bits, but for the dayshow I am a tease and on the night show I aim to please. hee hee!
But I am also aware that you cant please everyone babe so thanks for your comments either way xx

Did I also mention that I have recently done 2 seperate video shoots for Babestation Extreme with the top babe Karina Currie and the stunning Jada?? No.... Well you best check it out then lol!
xx

Kimmy, thanks for the reply. I realise this was a dayshow, but it just wasn't what I was expecting. I'm still at a loss as to how the underwear you was wearing was anything other than 'basic' - remember, it was you who suggested it was going to be different. How was the underwear you was wearing any different to the underwear all the other daygirls wear?

Also, in that you made out your show was going to be pushing the bounderies (not in so many words, but I read between the lines as I'm sure many others did) the all-in-one you changed into after the break came as a real disappointment. As soon as I saw that outfit my interest faded, as I knew there was no chance of any slip-ups.

Your actions and movements were far raunchier than most, but it just didn't have the edge that Ava's shows have had - that sense that things are right on the bounderies of control, and that at any moment that control may be lost... and it is those types of shows - as rare as they are - that really do it for me.

(07-06-2010 00:37 )StanTheMan Wrote:  Kimmy, thanks for the reply. I realise this was a dayshow, but it just wasn't what I was expecting. I'm still at a loss as to how the underwear you was wearing was anything other than 'basic' - remember, it was you who suggested it was going to be different. How was the underwear you was wearing any different to the underwear all the other daygirls wear?

Also, in that you made out your show was going to be pushing the bounderies (not in so many words, but I read between the lines as I'm sure many others did) the all-in-one you changed into after the break came as a real disappointment. As soon as I saw that outfit my interest faded, as I knew there was no chance of any slip-ups.

Your actions and movements were far raunchier than most, but it just didn't have the edge that Ava's shows have had - that sense that things are right on the bounderies of control, and that any moment that control may be lost.

Yes babe, it was different because Im a night babe not a day girl, I had a storyline in my head as I only had a bed set to work from, so I made the best of what I had - The girl next door, the gym outfit, the burlesque and the sexy pjs - but didnt get to wear the pjs as I ran out of time!
It was my way of having a bit of fun instead of laying in one spot coz of the rules etc.

As I said before - Ya cant please everyone!!!
x

This babe got my attention yesterday...very impressed.

Kimmy Haze 06-06-2010.

A few caps of Kimmy in that dress.

Killyourself did you get any of this towards the end of her show?

StanTheMan.. if i may, i believe Kimmy was referring to the fact that she would not be wearing just underwear.

But instead, an actual outift of some kind. In my opinion, she was not in any way referring to the underwear itself (type/style/material..)

Kimmy - if i'm correct, then brilliant, i admire you (at least) for this outlook on dayshows. In my opinion it's what dayshows need and should be all about. CP days are the only channel that incorporates having women dressed, teasing and being sexy. Please, continue..

Having said that, personally, it was a shame about the bed - i believe bed sets on dayshows contradict what i say above. So i didn't watch..!

(07-06-2010 12:28 )schmoo Wrote:  StanTheMan.. if i may, i believe Kimmy was referring to the fact that she would not be wearing just underwear.

But instead, an actual outift of some kind. In my opinion, she was not in any way referring to the underwear itself (type/style/material..)

Kimmy - if i'm correct, then brilliant, i admire you (at least) for this outlook on dayshows. In my opinion it's what dayshows need and should be all about. CP days are the only channel that incorporates having women dressed, teasing and being sexy. Please, continue..

Having said that, personally, it was a shame about the bed - i believe bed sets on dayshows contradict what i say above. So i didn't watch..!

nice one schmoo - I think that's what she meant, and it WAS a brilliant show. I think agonising about colour or style of underwear or whatever is missing the point, well certainly the point in my eyes, which is that I tune in to see a lovely girl looking gorgeous and beaming with a greta personality . This is Kimmy Haze! If people want to just look at knickers, as Kimmy says there are plenty of publications you can get hold of!

Well dobne Kimmy, and Club P - continue to rail against the norm.

Thumbs Up.