SCIROCCO
Banned
Posts: 759
Joined: Dec 2009
|
RE: Back to the golden age.(if only)
The current tame output must be losing punters by the thousand....don't even SKY+ anymore after I go to bed....zzzzzzzzzz
|
|
22-10-2011 11:58 |
|
RESPONSIBLE ADULT
Banned
Posts: 898
Joined: Jun 2010
|
RE: Back to the golden age.(if only)
(21-10-2011 18:01 )StanTheMan Wrote: I'm sorry, RESPONSIBLE ADULT, I'm as confused as ever and really don't understand what it is you're asking.
I thought you were simply asking us to imagine a world without Ofcom and a more liberal and broad-minded organisation in their place. If this were to happen the channels would simply revert to how they were before Ofcom clamped down. I don't see how your proposed scenario get's any more complex than that.
Stan, I am not asking any question, for anything, of anyone. Any possible scenario that I have suggested. I have gone on to give my own view of what I think the outcome would be regarding the channels As far as the girls are concerned no one could possibly predict what they would do. How could one? All my simple original post 'the part concerning the girls' said, was that it would be the interesting finding out. What was written as a throw-away piece is turning into somewhat of an epic.
|
|
22-10-2011 13:54 |
|
StanTheMan
Banned
Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
|
RE: Back to the golden age.(if only)
(22-10-2011 13:54 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote: What was written as a throw-away piece is turning into somewhat of an epic.
That's because you've not made yourself clear. People are giving answers to questions you've not asked and, seemingly, failing to answer the question you have asked.
You can't argue that your very first (hypothetical) question in your OP was the what would happen to the babeshows if Ofcom disappeared and a more "liberal and broad-minded organisation" were put in their place (your words, not mine). So I'll say again, they'd revert back to how they were before Ofcom clamped down. Now if that's not what you were asking, then you and me are speaking a different language.
(22-10-2011 05:49 )rockey Wrote: ......anybody see last nights rlc? nudity with a few flashes......
What sort of flashes? Are we talking gash here, and are we talking 'flashes' or slips? It's important that these things are defined fully, in order to appreciate your point.
(This post was last modified: 22-10-2011 15:04 by StanTheMan.)
|
|
22-10-2011 15:01 |
|
RESPONSIBLE ADULT
Banned
Posts: 898
Joined: Jun 2010
|
RE: Back to the golden age.(if only)
(22-10-2011 15:01 )StanTheMan Wrote: (22-10-2011 13:54 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote: What was written as a throw-away piece is turning into somewhat of an epic.
That's because you've not made yourself clear. People are giving answers to questions you've not asked and, seemingly, failing to answer the question you have asked.
You can't argue that your very first (hypothetical) question in your OP was the what would happen to the babeshows if Ofcom disappeared and a more "liberal and broad-minded organisation" were put in their place (your words, not mine). So I'll say again, they'd revert back to how they were before Ofcom clamped down. Now if that's not what you were asking, then you and me are speaking a different language.
(22-10-2011 05:49 )rockey Wrote: ......anybody see last nights rlc? nudity with a few flashes......
What sort of flashes? Are we talking gash here, and are we talking 'flashes' or slips? It's important that these things are defined fully, in order to appreciate your point.
For fucks sake Stan I've not asked any fucking questions What the fuck are you smoking.
|
|
22-10-2011 16:51 |
|
StanTheMan
Banned
Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
|
RE: Back to the golden age.(if only)
(22-10-2011 16:51 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote: For fucks sake Stan I've not asked any fucking questions What the fuck are you smoking.
Maybe you should have rephrased your OP then.
(20-10-2011 23:34 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote: And who would be the first channel to get back into the old routine?
|
|
22-10-2011 17:50 |
|
continental19
Posting Machine
![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif)
Posts: 1,257
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 38
|
RE: Back to the golden age.(if only)
(21-10-2011 06:59 )Scottishbloke Wrote: To be perfectly honest we've never really had a golden age, more just fleeting moments which have been all too brief with some of the channels taking it a wee bit further, we've had Babestar TV in 2006 for example which for all it's full frontal, it was still very much softcore compared to what the rest of Europe were showing, it was based more on Innuendo's than anything, I'd dearly love to see a new age as the golden age as far as I'm concerned never happened and is really just a myth similar to when people talk about the good old days. Bring on a new dawn instead of harking back to the past which their were no glory.
You're right matey, stop looking in the past, and look to the future, i think we can all agree the last 2-3yrs have been the best yet with more 241s and more interaction and so on. The fact still remains until Ofcom F**K off and the laws are relaxed as they used to be, only then can we start to enjoy our babe channels as they were intended.
I was reading in one of the posts how Ofcom can think a mans penis and testicles are perceived not to be offence yet a woman's Vagina is deemed to be Offensive mmmh work that one out?? The other night there was a couple on sexsextra doing naked Yoga, there you go, thats something we all can try in our living rooms ![laugh laugh](images/smilies/laugh.gif)
Anyway back to my point, there was the mans penis in full view flopping around as you do, and the woman's vagina had been faded out? Maybe all the guys at Ofcom are GAY and can't get enough of seeing men naked ![laugh laugh](images/smilies/laugh.gif) I'm just trying to figure how they've come up with this conclusion?
To conclude as scottishbloke has mentioned we all need to look to the future, and let all of us who love our babe channels hope 2012 will be Ofcom free YAY
|
|
22-10-2011 20:04 |
|