+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: The Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=408)
+--- Thread: Are 2 4 1s pointless these days? (/showthread.php?tid=50336)
Are 2 4 1s pointless these days? - dan g 27 - 01-10-2012 21:37
In my opinion, 2 4 1s are completely pointless these days across all the channels, as there is little or no interaction between 2 babes.
Maybe 2 4 1s are made to happen from time to time such as Zarwood, because people get a thrill seeing them or their favourite girls together and that helps generate more calls for the channels.
But anyway, I think 2 4 1s should be scraped, as I think there is more entertainment these days by seeing girls go solo.
Tell us what you think.
RE: Are 2 4 1s pointless these days? - jonnyalpha - 01-10-2012 21:45
I know what you mean about the content but the fact is every channel is losing revenue and getting rid girls,so any chance to get two babes on screen whether than interact or not must be a good thing if it keeps our fav girls in employment and on our screens.
RE: Are 2 4 1s pointless these days? - oklahoma001 - 01-10-2012 22:24
Pointless? No. Are girls with no apparent chemistry put together to frequently? Yes. Sophia/Katie and Ally/Sam's recent 241's were huge improvements over what we saw a couple months back when Elite paired Ally with a different girl every week. And barring their last show Zarwood is usually a winner for RLC but any other 241's pairups are forgettable. With a little improvement and competition from RLC or the busted leg that is BS, 241's could make a slight comeback. It's too bad that each channel appears to follow a different rulebook
RE: Are 2 4 1s pointless these days? - terence - 01-10-2012 22:37
the answer is yes!
RE: Are 2 4 1s pointless these days? - winsaw - 02-10-2012 09:11
not for me, i still enjoy the 241's more than the solo shows, Zarwood were great this weekend, but i do think it's all about the chemistry between the girls as this can make or break a show
RE: Are 2 4 1s pointless these days? - elgar1uk - 02-10-2012 09:54
The idea of a 241 is to speak to 2 girls in 1 call, which is still possible. That's why it's called a 241. So long as there are callers who still wish to speak to 2 girls in 1 call the 241s will serve a purpose and are not pointless.
RE: Are 2 4 1s pointless these days? - Carl-Gen X - 02-10-2012 10:11
The BS so called 241's are completely pointless...that they have the gall to call a part of the show whereby two girls with separate phones are on the screen who just happen to be occupying the same bed with at best minimal interaction is a joke in itself.
The S66 241's are a little better but with the Ofcom jackboot hanging over them at all times just itching to stamp on anything that might upset or corrupt the little darlings who might be watching, we're never going to see anything close to the standards of the pre 2011 days.
Get rid!
RE: Are 2 4 1s pointless these days? - bigglesworth - 02-10-2012 11:35
(02-10-2012 10:11 )Carl43a Wrote: two girls with separate phones are on the screen
If they have separate phones how is it a 241?
RE: Are 2 4 1s pointless these days? - Carl-Gen X - 02-10-2012 12:14
(02-10-2012 11:35 )bigglesworth Wrote:(02-10-2012 10:11 )Carl43a Wrote: two girls with separate phones are on the screen
If they have separate phones how is it a 241?
Good question...perhaps someone from BS could come on here and answer that?
RE: Are 2 4 1s pointless these days? - Rise - 02-10-2012 12:33
I agree with oklahoma on this really. It's only in the last few weeks I've found any enthusiasm at all for contemporary 2-4-1 output, precisely because of the match ups he mentioned (Sophia and Katie K ..and then Sam T with her infectious enthusiasm transmitting to whom she's paired with).
But more often the standard issue split screen thing (with each girl doing their own thing and occasionally pawing each other as if examining a jacket in Top Shop) is utterly pointless.