(17-03-2020 22:12 )Kingsmind Wrote:  fan of having at least 2 inductees into the hall of fame as i discussed this myself but not a fan of day time and night time hall of fame's as a hall of fame is just a hall of fame if you get what i mean so that means not including days and nights and anyway not every award has to include days and nights and especially the hall of fame doesn't have to include that.

(18-03-2020 04:07 )winsaw Wrote:  2 is not enough though, it needs to be more, I am not talking about spliting the hof in to days and nights I am saying the vote needs to be split or its Always more likely to be a night girl, also the web girls need to have a chance, the efforts of someone like Natt from fox babes are not less important than a girl who has been on tv her whole career, just because u don't watch a show didn't mean they are not worthy as they may have a huge body of work over a long period of time that's excellent and Should be in there,
Also I feel it's just to much of a fan club at the moment girls getting in for the wrong reasons, Beth should be in there there has been no one consistently good go over the last 10 years her efforts over a long span of time should see her in there , going to come up with a list of all the girls who should be in there already but are not

(18-03-2020 04:07 )winsaw Wrote:  2 is not enough though, it needs to be more, I am not talking about spliting the hof in to days and nights I am saying the vote needs to be split or its Always more likely to be a night girl, also the web girls need to have a chance, the efforts of someone like Natt from fox babes are not less important than a girl who has been on tv her whole career, just because u don't watch a show didn't mean they are not worthy as they may have a huge body of work over a long period of time that's excellent and Should be in there,
Also I feel it's just to much of a fan club at the moment girls getting in for the wrong reasons, Beth should be in there there has been no one consistently good go over the last 10 years her efforts over a long span of time should see her in there , going to come up with a list of all the girls who should be in there already but are not

(18-03-2020 12:26 )Kingsmind Wrote:  And anyway say if we do have 2 inductee's in the Hall Of Fame this is how i think we should work it out think we should forget the last 16 because that would be to much hard work with my idea of 2 tournaments so for the first Hall Of Fame it goes more or less the same way as follows the top 8 babes with the most votes in the nomination round move on into the Quarter's and the winner of this will of course not be included in the second Hall Of Fame instead the 7 babes which was unlucky not to be inducted will be joined by a new babe that got the most votes in the second nomination round making up the field of 8 again and so on we move on to find out the second Hall Of Famer so what do you think of this idea.

(18-03-2020 07:08 )babelover48 Wrote:  What I would like to see in the future is a little diversity as well. But always remember this guys, whoever you nominate and vote for, ONE of them will be the inductee or inductees into the HOF as per YOUR votes. I'd say for the time being whether we should extend the vote to web girls is something we can revisit and look at another time, and I think then we probably may end up in direct competition with the UKAP awards!! When we look at who is in the HOF at present it does strike me that we need to have the diversity in the inductions as many of the Black/Latin type girls we have had the pleasure of viewing over the years have been truly stunning and I will admit they haven't always had the luck of the draw so to speak, and I'm sure that has been something many of us have noticed, and I hope I can put right somehow!! And to be honest age should never be a barrier either.

(18-03-2020 07:00 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  

(18-03-2020 04:07 )winsaw Wrote:  2 is not enough though, it needs to be more, I am not talking about spliting the hof in to days and nights I am saying the vote needs to be split or its Always more likely to be a night girl, also the web girls need to have a chance, the efforts of someone like Natt from fox babes are not less important than a girl who has been on tv her whole career, just because u don't watch a show didn't mean they are not worthy as they may have a huge body of work over a long period of time that's excellent and Should be in there,
Also I feel it's just to much of a fan club at the moment girls getting in for the wrong reasons, Beth should be in there there has been no one consistently good go over the last 10 years her efforts over a long span of time should see her in there , going to come up with a list of all the girls who should be in there already but are not

I would agree that one a year isn't really enough but I think 5 is too many. I would go with 3.

I see where you're coming from with the day girls but I think the split should be more like 1 day girl and 2 night girls. I don't see how you can guarantee entrants from different categories though unless you change the format so that everybody votes just once, as in the Bs comp, and includes names from each category.

I wouldn't disagree with you about Beth but that's still just an opinion. Who exactly is in the HoF currently, that you think doesn't deserve to be there? You can't dictate to people how they should vote. Sounds like you just want to start appointing babes by committee, presumably with you as chairman

Webshow babes... the title is Hall of Fame. Who the hell is Natt from fox babes, never heard of her. In fact I just went and found Foxxx babes and I didn't recognise a single name in that section. I'm not saying they don't have fans, but there it is.

Regarding the 5 year rule, I think that should stand. But I would be in favour of everyone being allowed one 'wildcard' name, in their list of nominations, that could be less than 5 years on the shows. If a wildcard babe makes it into the draw she then takes her chances along with the rest, no special favours.