The UK Babe Channels Forum
Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Babestation (/forumdisplay.php?fid=99)
+---- Forum: BABESTATION TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+---- Thread: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=61550)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35


RE: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion - BarrieBF - 10-08-2014 15:16

(10-08-2014 11:04 )winsaw Wrote:  i think the plus is that it don't look like a bs channel, all the stuff i dislike big OSG, interruptions, short stints don't happen here and it just makes it so watchable,
props to them for doing something different and pulling it off

I think the most amazing thing of all is that some people here can't see the difference between this and the other Babestation channels. I'm referring to those posters who say it's just another channel, same old stuff, why not call it Babestation 4, etc etc. I noticed the lack of interruptions on the very first night. Has the channel ever plugged BabestationX for example? I haven't seen that happening myself.


RE: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion - RRROGER - 10-08-2014 15:48

TONIGHT>>>

[Image: image-59D0_53E78621.jpg]


RE: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion - JuanKerr - 10-08-2014 16:13

(10-08-2014 09:38 )Bandwagon Wrote:  I think you've misinterpreted what Lacey_Fan wrote Juan.
I believe he mentioned the pool idea in the afternoon, but it actually happened in the evening.
I'm sure he'll correct me if I'm wrong.

Ah! Thank you, Bandwagon - that does make far more sense. I was wondering why he was the only person who'd mentioned such an event.


RE: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion - Doddle - 10-08-2014 16:37

(10-08-2014 12:44 )Regenerated Wrote:  Although I've still got a problem with the name when an established star like Maddy appears on it, I'm also happy to see her get night shifts.
Wasn't the idea that putting someone experienced on with someone less so was that they'd be like a mentor? Not that there's been anyone particularly inexperienced on it yet, I grant you... Huh


RE: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion - RRROGER - 10-08-2014 16:51

TONIGHT>>>

[Image: image-9B4F_53E79473.jpg]


RE: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion - Bandwagon - 10-08-2014 18:01

I'm really looking forward to this particular pairing tonight, I do believe this will be fantastic!
I love the look of both girls and since Aruba obviously isn't shy laugh surely she will keep the filthiness forthcoming and Ruby will follow suit!
I'm anticipating lots of eyeballs on stalks eek


RE: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion - RRROGER - 10-08-2014 18:15

My view is that BS should get credit for innovation & variety, but this show is an inferior copy of their Apprentice/Academy series...

That had the starlets concept, highlighting emerging nightshow girls such as Sasha Ella/ Letesha Collins/ Lacey Lorenzo/ Vanessa Walker/ Georgie Sereno/ Rochelle Hardy...
.....but also opportunities for dozens of fresh new faces over the course of the shows.

Yet despite what I consider to be the best babeshow concept of all time it was hardly noticed on the forum....
......presume all the fanboys preoccupied with the schoolboy wank fodder on the other channels.


RE: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion - HannahsPet - 10-08-2014 22:06

Well they are in the sauna and there is a bottle of oil by the bucket it would be rude not to Wink


RE: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion - the priest - 10-08-2014 22:10

Not bothered what the channel is called Ruby has already got her lovely tits out wanna suck on her hard nipples.


RE: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion - HannahsPet - 10-08-2014 22:11

Did they Say it was an apprentice replacement we jumped to conclusions Well i was one of the first to say it was just an apprentice show. if its just a fourth channel then thats good the output from the last few days has been great thats what we wanted so what if no new names get the feeling its hard to find new faces to put shows