+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Xtreme Filth (/forumdisplay.php?fid=335)
+---- Thread: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=61914)
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 09-09-2014 16:50
Funny how all the channels and show names with the word x in them have turned out to be the lamest.
Xpanded TV = Lame
Xtreme Filth = Lame
When Bluebird launched on it's opening night it was heavily criticised but looking back it was a million times better than the shower of shit that Xtreme filth served up to us last night.
It was awful, abysmal and deserves all the negative feedback it deserves. If Bluebird on opening night was a car crash then Xtreme Filth was a Train wreck.
I never thought Studio66 could deliver anything worse than that awful USA Channel, I thought wrong, yes and by the sound of it if they have more babes on the bed tonight then the word sardines springs to mind.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - JuanKerr - 09-09-2014 17:07
(09-09-2014 16:50 )Scottishbloke Wrote: When Bluebird launched on it's opening night it was heavily criticised but looking back it was a million times better than the shower of shit that Xtreme filth served up to us last night.
I was a big defender of Bluebird, and you're right, those first couple of weeks produced some very naughty shows (and what must go down in history as one of the most explicit dayshows ever transmitted - courtesy of Cindy Behr). But even then people still whinged.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - Block - 09-09-2014 17:08
I missed the opening night. However i see a lot off negative reaction.
What i would like to know is what is this channel aiming for and who are they trying to compete against?
From what i can tell they aren't anymore xtreme than any other channel and their sets are as poor or worse than the other channels. They have some hardcore performers on their channel that are producing tamer performances than some of the softcore girls.
I'm not trying to criticise i just want to know the goals of this channel, could someone please tell me?
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - Block - 09-09-2014 17:09
Cindy Behr was awesome, she provided some of the best shows ever on the channels IMO.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - JuanKerr - 09-09-2014 17:16
(09-09-2014 17:08 )Block Wrote: I missed the opening night. However i see a lot off negative reaction.
What i would like to know is what is this channel aiming for and who are they trying to compete against?
From what i can tell they aren't anymore xtreme than any other channel and their sets are as poor or worse than the other channels. They have some hardcore performers on their channel that are producing tamer performances than some of the softcore girls.
I'm not trying to criticise i just want to know the goals of this channel, could someone please tell me?
I'm at a complete loss as to why anyone was expecting this channel to be any different to the others. They're all shit scared of Ofcom and I can't understand why anyone thought this new channel was going to buck the trend.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - Block - 09-09-2014 17:17
I'm probably very naive but i thought this channel was set up to compete with babestaion xtreme?
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - JuanKerr - 09-09-2014 17:23
(09-09-2014 17:17 )Block Wrote: I'm probably very naive but i thought this channel was set up to compete with babestaion xtreme?
Why did you think that? BSX is a pay-per-view channel. No FTA channel is ever going to be allowed that level of explicitness.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - jimmyt73 - 09-09-2014 17:24
Ok so we have had the first night of this channel,first the negatives,the first set was poor and the osg are far too big and as with BSs latest channel the name does not represent whats visually on offer,on the plus side both of last nights babes did well,my one theory about it is that like S66 USA it will be short lived because when the webshow starts it wont be able to advertise on tv and will only be available to website members restricting its appeal,especially if they can only show what they do on tv,in summary though its nice to have a new channel i think like USA its time on telly maybe short and mostly uninspiring
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - RatedR - 09-09-2014 17:25
the webshow next month is hardcore. This show is a regular babeshow for the girls who will also be on that.
However, that didn't stop a few days worth of people debating encryption
Despite it saying on Daily sport there's a babeshow and a webshow launching a month apart.Edit: Jimmy answered first
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - Block - 09-09-2014 17:32
(09-09-2014 17:25 )RatedR Wrote: the webshow next month is hardcore. This show is a regular babeshow for the girls who will also be on that.
However, that didn't stop a few days worth of people debating encryption
Edit: Jimmy answered first
So why the hell didn't they just make the S66 USA a webshow only, then at least they would be offering up something different. i.e. American pornstars as opposed to UK girls?