+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 16-11-2011 15:44
(16-11-2011 11:59 )Broncobilly Wrote: What ere pov?
Point of View shows - where the cameraman gives the viewers a first-person perspective of the action by using a hand-held unit and 'interacting' with the girl.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 16-11-2011 18:15
So if POV's are indeed banned, I can't really say I'll miss them much as under current Ofcom regulations they are normally piss poor, as are 2 and 3 for 1's, they just bore the hell out of me, I mean no touching of any kind, Elite used to be the master of 2 for 1's especially when it was Caty Cole and Charlie O'Neil on, what a show we used to get, is there anything that Ofcom haven't destroyed yet, also they are missing a very big point here that these shows are supposed to be fun aswell as erotic and they are neither at the moment, I fear for the future of the babe channels unless the rules are relaxed dramatically
RE: Ofcom Discussion - shankey! - 16-11-2011 18:27
(16-11-2011 18:15 )Scottishbloke Wrote: So if POV's are indeed banned, I can't really say I'll miss them much as under current Ofcom regulations they are normally piss poor, as are 2 and 3 for 1's, they just bore the hell out of me, I mean no touching of any kind, Elite used to be the master of 2 for 1's especially when it was Caty Cole and Charlie O'Neil on, what a show we used to get, is there anything that Ofcom haven't destroyed yet, also they are missing a very big point here that these shows are supposed to be fun aswell as erotic and they are neither at the moment, I fear for the future of the babe channels unless the rules are relaxed dramaticallyofcom have them by the scruff of their necks but instead of having a go back like a terrier they are cowering like lap dogs,the inevitable is clear enough to see ,its only the channel owners now who can do anything as it looks a forgone conclusion that the petition is years of making any political stand , this time next year i doubt this discussion will be worth posting on ;(
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 16-11-2011 18:49
It seems to me that rather than tackling Ofcom head on, the babe channels are dithering and waiting for the miracle that will never happen, they can wish Ofcom away until their hearts content but the reality is Ofcom are still here and show no sign of leaving in a hurry either, they have the support of the Torie and Labour party so their future is just about certain, but yes I agree with Shankey like he said the babe channels are all too much like an obedient dog following it's masters instructions, but the problem is if it bites then it gets put to sleep, and that's where the double edged sword issue remains a sticky point, but if they were to approach Ofcom in the correct manner they might make some headway, with the proper legal team for the channels in place they could maybe try this issue which I've previously stated under the European Human Rights Freedom act as it's not like the 900's haven't put safety measures in place, they have, all channels are and have been safety protected for years now and I think that's the real crux of the argument here, all safety measures are in place so legally they should be allowed to procede without hinderance or hassle from Ofcom, we don't live in a technological age for nothing and this nonsense has to stop
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mrcat - 16-11-2011 19:00
these shows are gone now i fear 4 the future
RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 16-11-2011 19:01
(16-11-2011 18:15 )Scottishbloke Wrote: ... is there anything that Ofcom haven't destroyed yet...
I watched a brilliant documentary last night, recorded from The Horror Channel. It was called Video Nasties: Moral Panic, Censorship and Videotape and if anyone here complaining about Ofcom hasn't seen it, I urge you to do so. You'll find it as an extra on this dvd and the documentary alone is worth the purchase price: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Video-Nasties-Definitive-Guide-DVD/dp/B004BDZ0FC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1321469510&sr=8-1
What I'm getting round to saying here is that during the notorious 'nasties' scare we saw exactly the same thing going on as we are now with Ofcom; corruption, lies, fraud... all in the name of Big Brother gaining control. If you think the people at Ofcom are corrupt, wait until you see the interviews with a certain Graham Bright - the conservative MP at the time who fought to bring about the Video Recordings Act. Present day, and these very same MPs care not a jot that all the films on the nasties list are now widely available, uncut, to anyone who wants them, only proving that they had no real concern about the content of these films in the first place. Bastards like Graham Bright sat on their big fat arses and happily watched as innocent men went to prison over the nasties scare
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 17-11-2011 00:57
(15-11-2011 23:23 )StanTheMan Wrote:(15-11-2011 23:03 )eccles Wrote: Latest news is that POVs have been banned.
Where did you hear this, eccles?
Not actually banned because Ofcom never do anything as controversial as banning something, that would be censorship. But they have let it be know that interesting content will attract unwelcome attention from Ofcom.
Thought someone else might have noticed, seems not so heres some detail. Believe it or not as you wish, I cant reveal the source. Heres what I have read:
Channel: "Belts will no longer be coming off. OFCOM said 'no: stop it'
"Fan: "Looks like the POV has been banned by ofcom. Roving camera is the new term and it is no way near the same" (not contradicted)
Channel: "Afraid not, Ofcom made it very clear they're not a fan of Belts coming off"
Fan: "Im sorry to say that pov has turned into at arms length and further" (not contradicted)
Fan: "Thought we were going to have a pov with all the girls?" Channel: "No such thing anymore"
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 17-11-2011 01:06
And yet the channels are still expecting callers, why when they have so many bullshit Ofcom rules in place, it's hardly erotic is it asking a model to do something sexy only to be told sorry I'm not allowed to do that, fuck this £1.53 a minute bullshit then, what a rip off to pay that amount of money only to be left unsatisfied, Ofcom and the Babe Channel producer's have got a lot to answer for as there is blame on both sides as far as I'm concerned for the Babe Channels to not even try to make a stand.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Roquentin - 17-11-2011 01:43
Here is Kermode's push for the doc you recommend Stan.
And here is the teaser for it (though Kermode explains it better):
RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 17-11-2011 02:28
Great clips, Roquentin, thanks for posting these! For anyone who can't be bothered watching these clips, I urge you to at least fast forward to 2:20 on the Kermode clip.
Martin Barker has become my hero overnight. A man who talks more common sense than I've ever heard anyone speak before. Such was his impact on me that I sent him an email earlier, not just to thank him for his part in that documentary, but to let him know what Ofcom are doing with the babe channels. He warns (as Mark Kermode points out in that clip) that we need to remember what happened during the nasties scare, so that we can be ready for it happening again. Well, he now knows that that time has come. It may not have hit the headlines like the nasties scare did, but it's happening, and it's being done with exactly the same level of corruption, survey-fixing and fraud.
If Professor Barker replies, I shall let you know hat he says.