+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 29-12-2012 23:48
babestation has improved a lot over the past 2 weeks and has closed the gap on rlc and studio66 which for me are the top two channels at the moment and still are. as has been said bs have a lack of variety of sets, also even though bs have a deep roster at times it only seems to use the same babes and have them dominate each night, not allowing other bs babes to get the calls in and get better as a babeshow babe. also their hard selling of pics, vids and bsx along with mic girls is annoying
also all the channels have their own big name girls not just bs
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - StanTheMan - 29-12-2012 23:49
(29-12-2012 23:29 )Smooga Wrote: I find Lori Buckby to be a gorgeous woman, stunning in fact.
She annoys me intensely. So much so, in fact, that I can't watch more than 10 seconds of her. I know, I'll just have a quick check what's on 906 - oh look, it's Lori and she's naked - it's not every night we see that.... oh, hold on, it IS every night we see that.
I hate the way she does that gritting teeth/growl type thing with her face, in a desperate attempt to make herself come across as filthy. Truth is, up against the real filth like Amanda Rendall or Lolly Badcock she'd run a mile.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Lotuseater - 30-12-2012 00:00
Babstation has been utter dross for months and months, and nothing I see has changed recently. The same tired old roster of tired girls who have no imagination and strike daytime poses on night shows...
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Fernandez Esperenda - 30-12-2012 00:13
(29-12-2012 23:49 )StanTheMan Wrote:(29-12-2012 23:29 )Smooga Wrote: I find Lori Buckby to be a gorgeous woman, stunning in fact.
She annoys me intensely. So much so, in fact, that I can't watch more than 10 seconds of her. I know, I'll just have a quick check what's on 906 - oh look, it's Lori and she's naked - it's not every night we see that.... oh, hold on, it IS every night we see that.
I hate the way she does that gritting teeth/growl type thing with her face, in a desperate attempt to make herself come across as filthy. Truth is, up against the real filth like Amanda Rendall or Lolly Badcock she'd run a mile.
Lolly used to be filth, she's completely different now, Lori is more daring than Lolly these days, Lori always puts on a great show, she can grit her teeth all she likes, it doesn't bother me, it's all part of her act, i'd much rather spend time watching Lori than Amanda any day, from what iv'e seen of Amanda on shows like shebang ect she oversteps the mark somewhat.
And comparing her to Amanda is just stupid, seeing as Amanda is a pornstar and Lori isn't...
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Smooga - 30-12-2012 01:35
(29-12-2012 23:49 )StanTheMan Wrote:(29-12-2012 23:29 )Smooga Wrote: I find Lori Buckby to be a gorgeous woman, stunning in fact.
She annoys me intensely. So much so, in fact, that I can't watch more than 10 seconds of her. I know, I'll just have a quick check what's on 906 - oh look, it's Lori and she's naked - it's not every night we see that.... oh, hold on, it IS every night we see that.
I hate the way she does that gritting teeth/growl type thing with her face, in a desperate attempt to make herself come across as filthy. Truth is, up against the real filth like Amanda Rendall or Lolly Badcock she'd run a mile.
I mentioned Lori because I didn't want to come across as somebody who hates Babestation and all their girls. I find Lori gorgeous, but like you, she pisses me off with her antics. I don't really watch her anymore because she's always stark naked, landing strip on display, and she is working overtime trying not to show anything. I find that boring.
If you turn over to 906 and Lolly is on, you'll find her on the bed, arse in the air, and the same look on her face the whole time. Granted, she moves around a bit more but I find Lolly much more annoying than I do Lori because I don't like her workrate. Lori uses the handthong, goes naked, and most of all she tries. Lolly just looks like she's going through the motions.
Plus I find Lori much nicer to look at than Lolly, but then that's just me.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - StanTheMan - 30-12-2012 02:51
(30-12-2012 00:13 )Fernandez Esperenda Wrote: [...] i'd much rather spend time watching Lori than Amanda any day, from what iv'e seen of Amanda on shows like shebang ect she oversteps the mark somewhat.
And that's a bad thing??
(30-12-2012 00:13 )Fernandez Esperenda Wrote: And comparing her to Amanda is just stupid, seeing as Amanda is a pornstar and Lori isn't...
Yes, but Lori likes to pretend/think she is, which is precisely my point.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - eccles - 30-12-2012 02:56
(29-12-2012 02:18 )HoneyRocks Wrote: Whilst a good idea in theory, 5 items you listed would not be allowed to be advertised on any UK TV or radio station as per the various broadcasting advertising codes.
Some of them are mainstream products that as mainstream brands would not want to associate with Adult TV sadly so an advertising base would be limited.
There was an adult shop that did advertise on a former local radio station near to where I live and the commercial was so watered down you wouldn't have realised it was an adult shop. Eventually the commercial was pulled from air.
It's certainly something the channels could try but the channels would find advertising hard to attract en mass. Even some of the satellite mainstream channels find it difficult in the current climate.
I have decided I am not sad enough (for once) to check the rules, but from memory the rules were changed to allow sex products to be advertised provided the ads themselves were not explicit. That might only be on encrypted channels, but even that only affects one or two categories, sex shops and sex toys. Lads mags can be advertised and are even sold in family friendly WHSmiths. Stag dos are not necessarily porn events and tourism can be advertised.
As for mainstream channels finding it difficult to attract advertisers, my point is that the babe channels have a loyal and well known demographic. Why waste money advertising to women when only men buy your product? Why waste money advertising power tools and credit cards to kids when there are over 18s channels?
Lads mags arent bothered about their image.
Some deodorants arent and deliberately bring out ads that get banned.
At least one solicitors firm advertises on Playboy.
A cash for Gold type advertises on a laddish mainstream channel in the 200s.
Lingere is clothing and I cant see Anne Summers or Victorias Secret being bothered by the association.
Laboutin and Jimmy Choo might not bite but there are plenty of cheap brands that would love a high spending captive male audience.
Just think of the sponsorship opportunities.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Addison - 30-12-2012 03:37
(29-12-2012 23:49 )StanTheMan Wrote: I hate the way she does that gritting teeth/growl type thing with her face, in a desperate attempt to make herself come across as filthy. Truth is, up against the real filth like Amanda Rendall or Lolly Badcock she'd run a mile.
I ge the impression that she does it because what's required of her on these night shows doesn't come naturally to her. She clings on to the "pain/pleasure" porn face precisely because she's forcing herself to work outside of her bailiwick, and she associates the face with the persona of the porn performer, or it distances her from what she's doing, or helps make it feel more distinct and separate from who she 'normally' is. She started out on the old BS daytime text-based interactive shows of course - a different type of work with different skills required, and she was very good on those (at one stage I thought she was going to use that as a springboard into other presenting-type work).
In contrast, Preeti and Priya say, or Lolly (not a fan, but have to give credit where it's due) or Cherri have a lovely relaxed, languid way about them. They aren't 'forcing' their performances in the same way, and that probably comes from them being more comfortable doing tease-core/softcore, and having had more experience of doing harder material. They don't have to wear a mask, because they're most instinctive and relaxed.
It's an odd comparison, but I feel about Lori on BS nightime the way I do about Gary Lineker after all these years of him being a TV presenter. By now he's had plenty of time to shake off the tenseness and relax into the work, but it just does not come naturally to him! There's always a hint of stiffness and awkwardness, a real reluctance to move away from the script and wing it, despite the show of composure, and the same sort of thing's going on with Lori on the night shows.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - StanTheMan - 30-12-2012 04:08
@ Addison: Far more eloquent than I put it, but nevertheless exactly what I wanted to say!
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Fernandez Esperenda - 30-12-2012 22:29
(30-12-2012 02:51 )StanTheMan Wrote:(30-12-2012 00:13 )Fernandez Esperenda Wrote: [...] i'd much rather spend time watching Lori than Amanda any day, from what iv'e seen of Amanda on shows like shebang ect she oversteps the mark somewhat.
And that's a bad thing??
If you think shitting yourself on a bed and leaving shitty tissue all over it is a turn on then no.....
personally i find that disgusting