+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity (/showthread.php?tid=28022)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 10-08-2014 20:52
Slightly off topic, but bear with me. While looking up party venues I came across a news reports about strip club licencing conditions at Bournemouth. The local council had imposed 40 conditions "including one that forbids dances from ‘any act which clearly simulates any sexual act’." and another "that the dancers at the clubs must not use graphic or suggestive language or behave in a ‘lewd manner’. "
WTF! Not lewd! These are lapdancing clubs where a fully naked women dance with their fannies not far from mens faces. How can that not be lewd.
The difference between TV and strip clubs is that clubs solicitors can object to unreasonable conditions.
Daily Echo
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Rigobert16 - 01-09-2014 11:55
Last night on Channel 4, they aired the film Paradise: Love. When I flicked over, there was a man dancing naked in front of 4 women in a room with everything on show. They were trying to give him an erection and at one point succeeded with it on show. The man began to slap the woman's breast's with his penis and then a bit later slap her as she laid down. Then to top it off, the man sat on the woman facing the camera as she grabbed his penis (fully visible). Why can channel 4 show this but the babeshows would get into trouble if they showed even a glimpse of a vagina?
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - hatessexistofcon - 01-09-2014 18:35
Basterding sick of this would they allow 4 men to rub a womens clit to make her wet ?? Fucking bastard ch4 reporting them to ofcom this not on .TV should not be wank material well women get aroused as much as men proven in labs,,this breaks ofcoms titilation rules plus erections should be R18 like clits and labia minor are .The week before more4 was penis docu after penis docu,man wanting himself off in wheelchair in Sex on Wheels,,The Worlds Biggest Penis etc..Chanel 4 flu raging homosexuals which itself is sexist biased double standards.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 02-09-2014 00:00
(01-09-2014 11:55 )Rigobert16 Wrote: Last night on Channel 4, they aired the film Paradise: Love. When I flicked over, there was a man dancing naked in front of 4 women in a room with everything on show. They were trying to give him an erection and at one point succeeded with it on show. The man began to slap the woman's breast's with his penis and then a bit later slap her as she laid down. Then to top it off, the man sat on the woman facing the camera as she grabbed his penis (fully visible). Why can channel 4 show this but the babeshows would get into trouble if they showed even a glimpse of a vagina?
Damn sure I replied to this, but the reply has vanished so here goes again. Apologies if two the same pop up.
Paradise Love - "Ulrich Seidl’s unsettling drama about the beach-boy sex trade in Kenyan holiday resorts, and the middle-aged women who patronise it." This gives an unflinching portrayal of middle aged women being entertained by young Africa men and deluding themselves that the men are not doing it for the money but love them. Clearly a searing indictment of modern society and the delusion and exploitation that desperate women are prey to. The direct images and lack of pixilation only serves to emphasise the point.
Difficult to see how this could be filmed the other way round, with paunchy middle aged men (with pony tails and sports cars) being flattered by fit young female pole dancers.
Part 2 starts at 01:00 Monday/Tuesday (in 5 minutes). "(2012) Daring Directors: Part two of Ulrich Seidl's trilogy explores the life of a deeply devout Catholic woman. In German/Arabic/subs. Adults only: Strong language & sex/disturbing scenes."
Part 3 is in 2 days, Weds/Thurs at the slightly earlier time of 00:55 (not 12:55 as the Channel 4 website says, thats lunchtime) "(2012) Daring Directors: Ulrich Seidl's trilogy on female longing concludes with this tale about a teenager's burgeoning sexual desire. In German/subs. Very strong language/sexual scenes."
Hope the teens are all 18+.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 04-10-2014 23:05
I am watching Top of the Pops 1976 on BBC4, and one of the less well remembered dance troupes, Legs and Co, are dancing to Don't Bring Me Down by ELO on scaffolding. The remarkable thing is their multi-coloured sateen dresses, open at the front and revealing their knickers each time they put their legs on the barre. For readers too young to remember TOTP, it was early evening family viewing.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Block - 08-10-2014 12:50
(04-10-2014 23:05 )eccles Wrote: I am watching Top of the Pops 1976 on BBC4, and one of the less well remembered dance troupes, Legs and Co, are dancing to Don't Bring Me Down by ELO on scaffolding. The remarkable thing is their multi-coloured sateen dresses, open at the front and revealing their knickers each time they put their legs on the barre. For readers too young to remember TOTP, it was early evening family viewing.
Hope there aren't too many readers too young to remember TOTP. Its last broadcast show was in 2006!
If you are too young to remember TOTP then fair play to you. But don't let your mum or dad catch you on these forums or watching the babeshows.
Worse still don't let offcom catch you, you'll most probably be hanged!
P.S. Eccles i know you meant 'if you were too young to remember TOTP from that period'. Just felt like being mischievous.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - seymourclunge - 15-10-2014 22:25
Good little French sitcom on Sky arts channel...I know!...sounds odd!
Called 'Hard'.
Centres around a widow who inherits her husbands online porn company. she previously knew nothing about it.
Actually seems quite good, just watched the first two episodes. Some scenes are obviously set in the 'studios' etc so plenty T&A on show.
Well worth a watch as a comedy by the looks of it, but with the odd bit of simulated screwing to boot!
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 17-10-2014 02:00
(15-10-2014 22:25 )seymourclunge Wrote: Good little French sitcom on Sky arts channel...I know!...sounds odd!
Called 'Hard'.
Centres around a widow who inherits her husbands online porn company. she previously knew nothing about it.
Actually seems quite good, just watched the first two episodes. Some scenes are obviously set in the 'studios' etc so plenty T&A on show.
Well worth a watch as a comedy by the looks of it, but with the odd bit of simulated screwing to boot!
Sky Arts does slip in the odd bit of, er, "culture". It usually helps if it is foreign and bought in. Burlesque Undressed was on again today, only rated 15, but in a good way.
Watch out for the chickens.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - seymourclunge - 17-10-2014 21:19
(17-10-2014 02:00 )eccles Wrote:(15-10-2014 22:25 )seymourclunge Wrote: Good little French sitcom on Sky arts channel...I know!...sounds odd!
Called 'Hard'.
Centres around a widow who inherits her husbands online porn company. she previously knew nothing about it.
Actually seems quite good, just watched the first two episodes. Some scenes are obviously set in the 'studios' etc so plenty T&A on show.
Well worth a watch as a comedy by the looks of it, but with the odd bit of simulated screwing to boot!
Sky Arts does slip in the odd bit of, er, "culture". It usually helps if it is foreign and bought in. Burlesque Undressed was on again today, only rated 15, but in a good way.
Watch out for the chickens.
Shall keep an eye out
I notice a couple of programmes on their that may be quite good next week.
Sex and the silver screen and Sex and the comix: both sound good.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - 8x8 - 17-10-2014 23:54
Channel 4 showed gratuitous full frontal male genitalia in stand up to cancer. Was for a good cause but there's no way they'd have shown a woman exposing her labia. Of course the 3 hosts: Davina (straight female), Dr Christian (gay male) and Alan Carr (gay male) all obviously have no interest in female genitalia and a common interest in male genitalia. Not to mention the thousands of women in the audience screaming "off off off" and cheering when they revealed their penises and testicles. If the presenters want to see it and the audience wants to see it for nothing other than fun then why do the babe channels have to cover up their genitals?
C4 gets away with showing male genitals in their "documentaries" because they pretend its a documentary (we know its not a documentary). They censor the female genitals which confirms its not a documentary. This stand up to cancer was supposed to be a fun comedy which turned into a sexualised strip which climaxed with full frontal male nudity. So I don't get the difference. They exposed male genitalia to women for fun but female genitalia can't be exposed to men for fun.
Next week on C4 is "The feeling nuts comedy night" wonder if that will be much the same?