+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Babestation Xtra (/forumdisplay.php?fid=150)
+--- Thread: Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=17684)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281
RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - babestation - 19-06-2010 01:09
(19-06-2010 01:06 )chrislatimer Wrote: your competitors the artist's known as bang media have a lot of complaints against them regarding the FREEVIEW shows , and you are the only competition they have , thus the common logic dictates, someone within the scummy organisation known as cellcast are throwing complaints about bangmedia to ofcom.
just basic columbo style common sense amigo
you have yet to provide evidence.. you can PM us with it if you feel more comfortable
RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - chrislatimer - 19-06-2010 01:11
i dont need evidence chico, aint like am trying to prosecute you. its called opinion, and opinion is not factual its just opinion.
RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - babestation - 19-06-2010 01:17
so you're happy to just talk rubbish about us on the forum, but can't back it up when asked.. nice
something quite serious regarding us grassing up competition to ofcom too
RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - chrislatimer - 19-06-2010 01:20
short of hacking into ofcoms files how can i prove it numnuts, i still think someone from cellcast did but i cant prove it.
and i dont talk rubbish far to clever for that.
and your right it is serious grassing up bang media to ofcom, reprehensible but sadly cant be proven.
by the way i dont present this as fact so dont be thinking about no slander related issues their my good man.
opinion is not slander its just a good old point of view.
and one last tidbit, i werent spreading this round the forum, you asked me my views and i told you.
RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - babestation - 19-06-2010 01:23
(19-06-2010 01:20 )chrislatimer Wrote: short of hacking into ofcoms files how can i prove it numnuts, i still think someone from cellcast did but i cant prove it.
and i dont talk rubbish far to clever for that.
and your right it is serious grassing up bang media to ofcom, reprehensible but sadly cant be proven
as long as people know you're talking rubbish and don't have anything to back it up
we wouldn't want people reading to believe it
RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - chrislatimer - 19-06-2010 01:25
(19-06-2010 01:23 )babestation Wrote:(19-06-2010 01:20 )chrislatimer Wrote: short of hacking into ofcoms files how can i prove it numnuts, i still think someone from cellcast did but i cant prove it.
and i dont talk rubbish far to clever for that.
and your right it is serious grassing up bang media to ofcom, reprehensible but sadly cant be proven
as long as people know you're talking rubbish and don't have anything to back it up
we wouldn't want people reading to believe it
am sure no one else does beilive it , so you can kill the defensive act .
RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - TheDarkKnight - 19-06-2010 01:44
People can make up their own mind, they don't need me to tell them what to think.
They can just go off of the evidence. The evidence as I see it is that you guys had a reputation for being tame whilst your competitors got all the plaudits. Then, out of the blue, a whole batch of complaints gets submitted to OfCom concerning your competitors shows that spanned a couple of months. It's highly dubious that such a batch of complaints was submitted by a member of the public. At the same time that your competitors gets wacked onto the back foot, you guys up your game and become less tame then you've ever been AND you launch a pay-per-view softcore porn channel. Add to the mix the changes in goverment and it seriously looks like you're both scuppering the competition and testing the waters of the new regime to see what they now find acceptable, but with your competitors shows rather than your own.
Whether you did or didn't, it damn well looks like you did.
I notice in all of this discussion that you haven't once said 'it wasn't us'. Suprising really, considering how the situation looks and how easy it is for you to deny it.
If I were in your position and I hadn't grassed up the competition, I would be going out of my way to tell my potential customers that, although it looks fishy, Babestation had nothing to do with the recent batch of OfCom complaints and the changes made to your broadcasts are entirely coincidental.
...and I would have done it the moment those complaints became public.
Hey, if it truly wasn't you guys, then I'm sorry, but...well...it's hard to believe, seriously.
The floor is yours...
RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - chrislatimer - 19-06-2010 01:57
bottom line is, noone has accused cellcast of anything we have just suggested we think it happened. yet you seem rather tetchy about it babestation.
the evidence is the evidence, is all.
if you have nothing to hide then dont worry about it and laugh it off.
RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - TheDarkKnight - 19-06-2010 02:03
(19-06-2010 01:09 )babestation Wrote: you have yet to provide evidence.. you can PM us with it if you feel more comfortable
He did.
It's called 'circumstancial evidence'.
Whilst it might not be the 'smoking gun', it has got people convicted in the past.
and right now, it's pointing it's finger squarely in your direction.
While I'm here, i'll add some more circumstancial evidence, in the form of a question...why didn't you guys join up with the rest of the broadcasters to fight OfCom's reclassification attempt?
The inference there is that you don't want to do that becuase you want to use OfCom as a stick to beat your competition up with.
Like I said, it's all circumstancial, but its there none the less. Methinks if you're bothered about how this makes you look, then you better put out a statement denying it.
RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - babestation - 19-06-2010 02:04
again, no evidence.. just pure speculation
we have not reported anyone, and it wouldn't be in our (or any other channels) interest to bring attention to the already closely watched channels
you've said yourself we have a reputation for being tamer, which justifies why we may have not had so many complaints
and perhaps the timing was more inline with the fact that we are expanding onto freeview, causing the competitors to push the boundaries further than they would before *
* this is of course my personal opinion