Studio66 Cougars - General Chat & Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236) +---- Forum: Studio 66 Cougars (/forumdisplay.php?fid=318) +---- Thread: Studio66 Cougars - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=57344) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 |
RE: Studio66 Cougars - General Chat & Discussion - Whynot - 17-12-2015 21:27 (17-12-2015 10:12 )Champion Wrote: "Cougars" has such great potential - but the roster needs refreshing IMO. Cougars don't need to be overweight and rough. You nailed it!!! There are several women over the age of 40 who are still sexy. Unfortunately they never appear on these shows. Instead we get the flab and the rough. The only requirement seems to be age unfortunately. RE: Studio66 Cougars - General Chat & Discussion - Doddle - 17-12-2015 21:38 I think it's a crummy name too. Just makes me think of John Fashanu yelling "Cougar Awoogah!" Hypothetically, I guess. RE: Studio66 Cougars - General Chat & Discussion - forumdude - 19-12-2015 00:58 Fuck dani and lucy are boring,neither look like getting naked.New channel name same shit shows. RE: Studio66 Cougars - General Chat & Discussion - milfspotter - 19-12-2015 20:03 (17-12-2015 21:27 )Whynot Wrote: Instead we get the flab and the rough. Everyone's entitled to their opinion but surely the likes of Danielle, Faye, Wendy and Lucy can't be considered flabby or rough. RE: Studio66 Cougars - General Chat & Discussion - Whynot - 19-12-2015 20:21 (19-12-2015 20:03 )milfspotter Wrote:(17-12-2015 21:27 )Whynot Wrote: Instead we get the flab and the rough. 1 for the first category and 3 for the other Taylor Morgan, Avalon Kassani, Amanda Pickering all around the same age and former tv channel babes... Dionne Mendez, Lynda Leigh again similar age and in a different league to the S66 lot RE: Studio66 Cougars - General Chat & Discussion - iluvcathy - 20-12-2015 22:10 I've said it before on this forum, and I'll say it again. If you don't like it then simply don't watch it, try watching another channel or using the off button. One person might not like the babe on screen, but someone else might. And it is important to remember when passing criticism, that different people have different likes & dislikes. You can't please all the people all of the time And according to the GGTV website they have signed another new babe called "Sammy Sanders", you can find all about her here. http://www.goldengirlstv.com/profile.asp?girl=sammysanders RE: Studio66 Cougars - General Chat & Discussion - bigfatpiggyporker - 20-12-2015 22:57 (20-12-2015 22:10 )iluvcathy Wrote: I've said it before on this forum, and I'll say it again. If you don't like it then simply don't watch it, try watching another channel or using the off button. This should be made a sticky post every new member (and some current ones) should be referred to once in a once. It's true for this channel and it's true for all channels... RE: Studio66 Cougars - General Chat & Discussion - forumdude - 22-12-2015 22:46 Nice see throughs on dani t at the moment....the ass part RE: Studio66 Cougars - General Chat & Discussion - derekdas - 22-12-2015 23:46 (22-12-2015 22:46 )forumdude Wrote: Nice see throughs on dani t at the moment. Have you got x-ray vision? RE: Studio66 Cougars - General Chat & Discussion - Champion - 23-12-2015 08:37 (19-12-2015 20:21 )Whynot Wrote:(19-12-2015 20:03 )milfspotter Wrote:(17-12-2015 21:27 )Whynot Wrote: Instead we get the flab and the rough. Exactly Whynot, good post. |