![]() |
Kerrie Lee - Studio66 - Chat & Discussion (Only) - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236) +---- Forum: Studio 66 TV (formerly Elite TV) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=255) +----- Forum: STUDIO 66 TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=66) +----- Thread: Kerrie Lee - Studio66 - Chat & Discussion (Only) (/showthread.php?tid=61897) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 |
RE: Kerrie Lee - Chat & Discusion - mrmann - 18-01-2016 00:21 ^ Exactly, already being more censored than Fernanda! So lame. She's definitely being restricted. Really hope she goes to Babestation. RE: Kerrie Lee - Chat & Discusion - Rammyrascal - 18-01-2016 00:21 ^^ must have a producer tonight who clearly doesn't like babes going naked a lot ![]() RE: Kerrie Lee - Chat & Discusion - Snooks - 18-01-2016 00:22 No consistency whatsoever. Farcical ![]() RE: Kerrie Lee - Chat & Discusion - Rammyrascal - 18-01-2016 00:30 for once I do agree, got to have consistency with how the babeshow rules are interpreted. Fernanda's producer last night clearly has interpreted the rules differently compared to Kerrie-Lee's producer tonight even so think so far it's been a very good show from Kerrie-Lee tonight with oil & nudity RE: Kerrie Lee - Chat & Discusion - ShandyHand - 18-01-2016 01:15 ^ I agree with that. Even though the stupid thing is it MIGHT even be the same guy. Seems to me we can't say on even that these days. Inconsistency can come from several reasons. RE: Kerrie Lee - Chat & Discusion - southlondonphil - 18-01-2016 01:38 (18-01-2016 00:30 )Rammyrascal Wrote: Fernanda's producer last night clearly has interpreted the rules differently compared to Kerrie-Lee's producer tonight Not necessarily. It might be the same guy who just trusts Fernanda more than he trusts Kerrie-Lee. RE: Kerrie Lee - Chat & Discusion - Rammyrascal - 18-01-2016 10:49 Regardless of what producer Kerrie-Lee has last night, it was still a brilliant babe of the night performance from her including nakedness & oil. Also was her usual fun bubbly self Hope she's back on soon RE: Kerrie Lee - Chat & Discusion - ShandyHand - 18-01-2016 17:14 (18-01-2016 01:38 )southlondonphil Wrote:(18-01-2016 00:30 )Rammyrascal Wrote: Fernanda's producer last night clearly has interpreted the rules differently compared to Kerrie-Lee's producer tonight ...for one... or: 2. Plain favouritism. 3. He could have been told or realised he was too lenient with Fernanda. 4. He could have been more inclined to leave off the button when he saw how well Fernanda was doing on the phones as opposed to, perhaps, KL's more normal stats. As I say, all open to debate, and as Rammy says pretty irrelevant really, it just proves what we have known all along: We will never know when that button will be pressed even with the same guy in charge as the rules are so open to interpretation on any given night. I have just realised (very stupidly ![]() Regardless, it is definitely a different take on the conundrum to the other channels and probably leads to more varied content levels than elsewhere (maybe frustratingly so for the viewer/caller?). I doubt if more consistency could ever be achieved if they stick to this logo method. For all it's faults, personally, I'd rather have it than not due to the above. RE: Kerrie Lee - Chat & Discusion - SOCATOA - 18-01-2016 17:31 Shoot all the fucking producers ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() RE: Kerrie Lee - Chat & Discusion - geezerbob - 18-01-2016 18:49 I also got the impression that she was being rationed with her use of oil?????? Let the babe do her thing and we'll get a visual treat ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Like a wise man once said: "PECKINGORDERITUS" |