+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+--- Forum: Former Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=237)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV Daytime (formerly Elite TV Daytime) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=266)
+----- Forum: Lucy-Anne Brooks (/forumdisplay.php?fid=420)
+----- Thread: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=285)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 29-11-2014 19:21
^^^
that's a wish that's never going to come true that everyone wont stop calling the daybabes like lucy-anne that do stay on after 10pm people will keep on calling them thinking they will be the person that will get the daybabe to get her boobs out and go topless, also because they can do dirty talk with the daybabe after 10pm, which they cant before 10pm. also for me because you get to see new faces on nights often wearing a lot less than they do on days
also quite a few daybabes who have done these tease/nightshows after 10pm have gone on to become full time nightbabes with examples being Clare Richards, Lori Buckby and Paige Tyler.
I personally hope the tease/nightshows continue for a good while yet
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - stemmata - 29-11-2014 19:31
I did not need to be told.
I would'nt call not ever and never watch.
Prefer to turn over and watch something truly entertaining on the movie channel.
There is understanding, and bending your back. But the number of members that have posted on this thread accepting so little and treating it as a feast is ..................well scary.
Enjoy your "nothing"
S.
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Joey 27 - 29-11-2014 20:07
(29-11-2014 19:21 )Rammyrascal Wrote: ^^^and the likes of Tashie Jackson, Danielle Anderson and Gemma Hiles never did become nightbabes, though if it were up to them they'd still being doing these pointless tease hours now showing F all, their call stats will probably still be good though and that's all that matters eh
also quite a few daybabes who have done these tease/nightshows after 10pm have gone on to become full time nightbabes with examples being Clare Richards, Lori Buckby and Paige Tyler.
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Bandwagon - 29-11-2014 20:42
(29-11-2014 19:21 )Rammyrascal Wrote: people will keep on calling them thinking they will be the person that will get the daybabe to get her boobs out and go topless
Not any more Rammy because......
(29-11-2014 12:56 )Lucy-Anne Wrote: I will not be getting topless
Not sure that was the best admittance on her behalf but it's handy information for me.
"Slow moving traffic ahead..... rerouting"
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - The Silent Majority - 29-11-2014 21:16
(29-11-2014 17:05 )Joey 27 Wrote: it really is seriously arrogant of these models when they think that average joe's like us don't deserve to see their tits
Almost as arrogant as telling callers who they should and shouldn't call with their own money.
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Jay1 - 29-11-2014 21:19
For me this whole episode has gone beyond whether or not Lucy will/won't (she won't, by her own admittance) go topless. Her attitude and reaction, for me, to reasonable questions, opinions and constructive criticism has been over the top. Belittling posters on here for offering their two penny's worth. A forum where praise and criticism are given depending not only on a poster's mindset but also on how they perceive a show and whether they are getting what they feel they should. I haven't read one single post in this thread that is demeaning or insulting to Lucy in any way. Sadly, Lucy has somehow interpreted these posts as in some way being insulting, a personal attack or overly derogative. Also, the previous stance of attempting to say that callers didn't ask her to go topless has changed pretty quickly. Give her credit for having the sense to see that that flimsy defence/reason wouldn't stand the test of time for very long. Asking the moderators to remove the thread? Says it all.
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Goodfella3041 - 29-11-2014 21:42
^^^ As you've specified, I think that's a fair depiction of her post a few pages back in this thread when she threw a bit of an unnecessary tantrum.
Her latest post seemed a lot more measured and mature to me. Calling our comments "silly" was about the worst of it and, in the context of what's been said about her, it didn't seem particularly over-the-top. So I'll give her credit for gaining some perspective on the issue, speaking her mind, and not getting exercised about comments she disagrees with (as opposed to her previous post, which was pretty ludicrous).
That's just me trying to be fair based on what's been written. I'm not a fan leaping to her defense. In fact, it goes against my better instincts to defend her at all because the whole findom thing grates with me. For that alone, I think she should be ashamed of herself.
Objectively speaking though, her last post seemed pretty harmless to me. The general thrust and tone of the response, on the other hand, just confirms the damned-if-they-do / damned-if-they-don't perception that most of the babes have about posting anything at all on this forum.
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 29-11-2014 21:47
(29-11-2014 12:56 )Lucy-Anne Wrote: S66 ask me to do the extended tease hours... I don't ask them.
I will be doing more of these extended tease hours so if you don't like/want to see them its a matter of switching over as I will not be getting topless.
Hope the clarifies and stops any type of speculation
These are the salient points from Lucy Anne's post imo.
I have been highly vehement and strong in my criticism of the attitude of some of the babes across the channels and with good reason in other parts of the forum. I make no apology for it either.
However...........
Look at the above 3 statements I have selected from her post.
She has been asked to do them, she did not ask to do them.
Presumably the people who asked her knew how far she was prepared to go and accepted that.
She was clearly offered decent money to do it.
Nobody would decline good money to essentially do what they want on their own terms in any field of work.
Everybody knew where they stood at the employer end and ultimately the viewers are left to accept or reject.
The fact that I rejected and will do so in future is not the point.
The point is I am not her boss, I am not in control of S66. Without wishing to blow my own trumpet too much if I was in charge of a channel and had a quality roster of babes I would like to think I would deploy much more effectively and sensibly.
The fact that Lucy is being deployed incorrectly is no fault of hers no matter what anybody's perception of her as a person might be.
She will be doing more of these extended tease hours and will not be getting her tits out.
Ground rules confirmed. Choice presented to me to accept or reject. Thanks, I reject but appreciate knowing where I stand.
Does this clarify and end speculation?
Yep.
Game over.
I'm off to play my own little game by MY rules while Lucy plays her game to rules that her channel will accept for an hour or two every now and again
.
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 29-11-2014 22:49
(29-11-2014 21:19 )Jay1 Wrote: For me this whole episode has gone beyond whether or not Lucy will/won't (she won't, by her own admittance) go topless. Her attitude and reaction, for me, to reasonable questions, opinions and constructive criticism has been over the top. Belittling posters on here for offering their two penny's worth. A forum where praise and criticism are given depending not only on a poster's mindset but also on how they perceive a show and whether they are getting what they feel they should. I haven't read one single post in this thread that is demeaning or insulting to Lucy in any way. Sadly, Lucy has somehow interpreted these posts as in some way being insulting, a personal attack or overly derogative. Also, the previous stance of attempting to say that callers didn't ask her to go topless has changed pretty quickly. Give her credit for having the sense to see that that flimsy defence/reason wouldn't stand the test of time for very long. Asking the moderators to remove the thread? Says it all.
I wouldn't say lucy-anne's reaction was "over the top" given some of the comments she was getting which were not just criticising her for not going topless or the financial domination she does, they went beyond that and had a go at lucy-anne as a person, saying she's got a bad attitude etc. so I wasn't surprised with how she reacted. If I had comments aimed at me like lucy-anne got, which were having a go at her as a person, then I would have reacted like she has. Agree with goodfella3041's last point about the response to lucy-anne's post confirming the damned if they do, damned if they don't perception that most of the babes have.
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Joey 27 - 29-11-2014 23:12
(29-11-2014 21:16 )The Silent Majority Wrote:of course they can call who they like but the fact is if viewers want to see a better show from a babe then the caller should treat it like a nightshow and not bang on about his midlife crisis or something? it baffles me when i hear that some callers don't even ask to see a babe's tits on a nightshow, but with all this "call stats" bullshit the callers could talk to the model about politics, the weather or where she got her handbag from all night and she gets to keep her job cos she is bringing in the calls(29-11-2014 17:05 )Joey 27 Wrote: it really is seriously arrogant of these models when they think that average joe's like us don't deserve to see their tits
Almost as arrogant as telling callers who they should and shouldn't call with their own money.
are freeloaders like me supposed to be grateful to all callers cos they pay their money? it's callers like snookered who im grateful too for getting a babe naked and putting on a good show, if i called the babes i'd only talk to her if she got her tits out cos guess what its a night show on a adult channel im not talking to my fucking mate, if more people got pissed off and hung up as soon as a model says she won't get her tits out then the likes of lucy wouldn't be doing them and we wouldn't need to moan on here
rammy says he used to call the babes, fuck knows what he talked to them about, as he keeps on saying a babe going topless on a nightshow is not important so he probably never asked, he probably said "i've spoken to you for 20 mins so your calls stats will be good goodbye louise"