+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 08-12-2011 22:50
Yea you're right Stan maybe I was clutching at straws a bit, however if they could prove to Ofcom that it would be secure then maybe just maybe Ofcom might allow stronger material, oh well who knows with these Muppets in London they couldn't even regulate a piss up let alone anything else
RE: Ofcom Discussion - shankey! - 08-12-2011 22:57
(08-12-2011 22:50 )continental19 Wrote: Yea you're right Stan maybe I was clutching at straws a bit, however if they could prove to Ofcom that it would be secure then maybe just maybe Ofcom might allow stronger material, oh well who knows with these Muppets in London they couldn't even regulate a piss up let alone anything else
what i want to know is how can the channels BE any tamer?by not going topless till 12 is that what they mean,cause they dont do anything else apart from show their boobs!!!!!!!!
RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 08-12-2011 23:04
(08-12-2011 22:57 )shankey! Wrote:(08-12-2011 22:50 )continental19 Wrote: Yea you're right Stan maybe I was clutching at straws a bit, however if they could prove to Ofcom that it would be secure then maybe just maybe Ofcom might allow stronger material, oh well who knows with these Muppets in London they couldn't even regulate a piss up let alone anything else
what i want to know is how can the channels BE any tamer?by not going topless till 12 is that what they mean,cause they dont do anything else apart from show their boobs!!!!!!!!
Well Shankey if that's what they are considering then the all the Babe channels might as well start packing there bags and go home, because if that comes into force the affects on the babe channels would be catastrophic
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mrmann - 08-12-2011 23:24
Sadly I don't see anything changing for the better. Ofcom clearly finds vaginas to be scary and dangerous, and I don't think the babe channels care much to do anything about it. Playboy seems to be the only one who might take a stand, which I think is terrific!
However, I get the feeling that even with the dimished calls, that the women don't care too much because they can still make money by doing shoots for the websites, by doing non website photo shoots, and by escorting, under the radar or not. Anyone of the best women on these channels can just sleep with a few people and presto, that's a few grand in the bank, not to mention the fact that many of them are sought after to cameo on TV shows, or to work at boxing and sporting events. Even with the low calls, it's not like all of them will be out on the streets soon, so that's the main reason why I don't think some of them care much. Now, the less popular women would care more, because they are less sought after and have less opportunites in the same field outside of the night shows. The only options for them are porn or escorting, or a regular 9-5 job (if there are any left), so calls are very important.
Look at Elite. Most of the women are pretty damn good looking in general, fake breasts or not, and if the channel was to go under tomorrow, most of them could probably get good work very quickly, but that's because there's a greater number of attractive women there, whereas on some of the other channels, there are more women and it's more mixed. They'd also still have the website, which I'd assume is quite successful. Elite has little incentive to rock the boat or to challenge Ofcom, not to single them out, but I think some would agree with me.
I'm surprised that Cellcast hasn't challenged Ofcom, because they have gone way downhill in the past month or so, and the numbers of very sought after women are quite small, when compared to how they were a year ago. Maybe I'm wrong and they are doing OK, but it doesn't seem that way.
Regardless of my theories, it's been proven already that the women on ALL of these channels are willing to show more if allowed, not every women, but most from what we've seen. Also, I would say that these channels were much more successful when the censorship was less, so based on that, the calls aren't going to diminish if the women show and do more. They will INCREASE!
RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 08-12-2011 23:36
Well this might be a futile act but I've decided to right to the Prime Minister and let him no my thoughts on Ofcom and with the needless regulation costing his government millions of £'s etc etc.
And if a 9yr old can write to the PM and get him to act then I think I'll give it ago, I'm a guy who is determined to save our beloved babe channels, i can't just to let them slowly slip away. Look I'm 38 yrs old i pay my taxes, and if I want to see beautiful naked woman on TV well I say F**K Ofcom and I'm going to give it a go and write a dam good letter to him.
Let's face it I've got nothing to lose.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Wanderer - 08-12-2011 23:56
It would be good to know just what would satisfy Ofcom.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Wanderer - 08-12-2011 23:57
Erm I meant by way of anti-kid technology, not getting focked senseless.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 08-12-2011 23:58
(08-12-2011 23:56 )Wanderer Wrote: It would be good to know just what would satisfy Ofcom.
That no vagina's ever existed
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Wanderer - 09-12-2011 00:02
(08-12-2011 21:45 )HoneyRocks Wrote: Heaven help if that 10 year old little brat had been around at the end of the 70's watching the raunchy dance routines of Hot Gossip, also Legs and Co on the Kenny Everett show on ITV and Top Of The Pops on BBC 1 TV between 7 & 8pm at night before the time of the then non existant watershed!
Mary Whitehouse threw enough hissy fits and complaints back then trying to be a self imposed regulator, imagine if Ofcon had her onboard now lol!
Makes me wonder if Ma & Pa worded the brats letter as most 10 year olds wouldn't normally be that clever with their use grammar or technology!
Thing is back then everyone, and I means everyone, thought she was a joke, it was just that no-ones dared to come out and say it. Local vicars were all into allowing kids to have sexual freedom. These days there are a lot of middle aged saddos who've never had a sex life who would agree with her, too many Christian broadcasters who won't stand up to her successors and a queue of politicians wanting to lick their ares for a few cheap votes.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 09-12-2011 02:13
(08-12-2011 23:36 )continental19 Wrote: Well this might be a futile act but I've decided to right to the Prime Minister and let him no my thoughts on Ofcom and with the needless regulation costing his government millions of £'s etc etc.
And if a 9yr old can write to the PM and get him to act then I think I'll give it ago, I'm a guy who is determined to save our beloved babe channels, i can't just to let them slowly slip away. Look I'm 38 yrs old i pay my taxes, and if I want to see beautiful naked woman on TV well I say F**K Ofcom and I'm going to give it a go and write a dam good letter to him.
Let's face it I've got nothing to lose.
We all should. I keep telling myself I will, havent got round to it yet. The outline of my message, short and polite, will be that in a civilised society broadcasting policy for the entire nation should not be revolve around one 10 year old who has the initiative to write to the top. Also adults are entitled to adult friendly entertainment during the day, provided it is not actually harmful to children. The concept that before 9pm everything on every channel should be suitable for all children is absurd. If applied even handedly many popular programs would be banned. Many relationship type shows discuss divorce, marital violence, casual sex and casual drinking. Divorce is a vary scary subject for children, particularly those who are going though or have been through it (affects Trisha, Jeremy Kyle, Loose Women and more). The supernatural scares some (Ghost Hunters International). Special Rescure Ops deals with mild peril. No, severe peril actually. Two And A Half Men is broadcast on Comedy Central from 11am but revolves around causual sex, heavy drinking, smoking, gambling and drug use. The X Files (Sky Atlantic 11am) can be scary. These are just a few examples that are not suitable for all children. Even QI, Top Gear and Have I Got News for You contain sexual references. Many adults work antisocial hours and cannot watch evening television. Many adults live in child free homes because their children have grown up, they have not had any yet, are infertile, or are gay. These people make a valuable contribution to the economy and society in general and are entitled to varied stimulating and entertaining television throughout the day. By all means keep the main 5 channels child safe, but please dont insisist that every channel, however specialised, is suitable for 10 year olds during the day.