Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Babestation Xtra (/forumdisplay.php?fid=150) +--- Thread: Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=17684) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 |
RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - babestation - 20-06-2010 11:44 the channel is more for the fans of the Babestation girls, we all of course know you can get more on european satellite. You won't find Camilla, Tiffany etc on there though RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - TheDarkKnight - 20-06-2010 13:33 (20-06-2010 11:44 )babestation Wrote: the channel is more for the fans of the Babestation girls, we all of course know you can get more on european satellite. You won't find Camilla, Tiffany etc on there though Yeah, the way I see it, that's your main selling point, along with the platform you're broadcasting on. I think you'll find both those selling points significantly decrease over time though. ...as you probably already know, which is why you're charging a premium while you can. For the record, I'm pleased that you've started broadcasting this type of material on freeview. I'm 100% behind the principle of the broadcasts. However small, it is a step in the right direction (so as not to contradict my earlier posts, I still think it's 'fuck all' compared to what you could be doing). I simply object to paying money for softcore porn, whoever it stars, I would just spend most of my time beating myself up for being ripped off, if I did. Your programming is, to me, a step backwards. I long ago got pissed of with British Lesbian scenes broadcast on 'Adult channels' that mostly starred chicks who weren't really into it. As far as I can tell, that's practically all you've got to offer. A purely personal opinion based off of my own experience. I'm sure others will enjoy your programming...although, I'm not sure how long for. Then you'll find yourself in the same stable as all the other British Adult broadcasters....being slated for broadcasting sub-standard shite and doing nothing about getting things changed. Who cares though eh...there's always the pisshead coming home on a Saturday night after getting knocked back in a nightclub. I'm sure those guys will fill you coffers for you just fine. RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - Rogerbee - 20-06-2010 13:53 Yeah, those pissed up idiots can go and watch that instead of drunkenly trying to fondle lapdancers, you'll only get chucked out! There are no bouncers on Xtreme, unless you count breasts! RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - coin - 21-06-2010 11:23 Sorry, of course BSX is not on Sky I got my wires crossed. I am a satellite fan and mainly watch programmes both adult, film and sport, having a motorised system and able to watch virtually anything that takes my fancy, I was merely demonstating that there is more to life than the handful of BS girls that are recycled night after night and thoroughly bore the pants off of me. Now that Cleo; who IMO is the most attractive girl I have seen in many a year, has joined the Production team and being rooted for her efforts, has gone, [/b]it is not worth watching. There are plenty of Free To Air channels offering attractive girls on the satellite arc who go much further than the droll BS. If you pay out a mere £79 per year you can get half a dozen channels or more that offer everything a man desires. Better still find a girlfriend of two with sex on tap and smile all day just like those who run BS. RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - Rogerbee - 21-06-2010 14:05 BS is having a girlfriend without the headaches, moodswings and PMT! RE: BS XTREME Screenshots (No videos permitted) - Rammyrascal - 21-06-2010 19:25 right off to dig the 3D glasses out RE: BS XTREME Screenshots (No videos permitted) - irishtripod - 22-06-2010 00:13 (19-06-2010 10:48 )David Wrote: God I so wish I could get Freeview Does the babestation website have any of this content there? You could probably show penetration on the website aswell.... RE: BS XTREME Screenshots (No videos permitted) - TheDarkKnight - 22-06-2010 01:25 (21-06-2010 19:15 )dirk362 Wrote: Not convinced watching porn in 3D will catch on...I've found it works kinda well in HD, your DVD/BluRays will work, for the most part. They only really fall over when the actors start poking things right out of the screen. Your average ~700meg .avi file doesn't work at all though. I couldn't get the BS stuff posted on youtube to work for me, regardless of which type of glasses I used. Which is strange because it was 1080p. My glasses simply didn't filter the colours properly. It's the same with the screen grabs you posted too. The channel 4 broadcasts from a few months ago worked OK, even after recording one of the shows. RE: BS XTREME Screenshots (No videos permitted) - dirk362 - 22-06-2010 05:57 (22-06-2010 01:25 )TheDarkKnight Wrote: I couldn't get the BS stuff posted on youtube to work for me, regardless of which type of glasses I used. Which is strange because it was 1080p. My glasses simply didn't filter the colours properly. It's the same with the screen grabs you posted too. Potentially this is down to going from interlaced to progressive via top-field de-interlacer. I always encode assuming people will watch on a computer, so deinterlace. Although watching the original material in 544x576i (DAR 1024x576i) it still doesn't come off as working all that well. RE: BS XTREME Screenshots (No videos permitted) - IanG - 22-06-2010 22:12 dirk362, its probably brightness or colour balance - simple as that. Try PS or summin. The blue or green looks too much to me, its ghosting in rt eye. Anyone else see it? Could be my filter (I made these specs from gels but usually work great). |