Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity

Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity (/showthread.php?tid=28022)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Scottishbloke - 08-01-2015 21:09

Lets put this into context. The Benny Hill show was crap hence the reason it got cancelled, it had nothing to do with political correctness. It's ratings slumped. This is the official reason as for its cancellation when it was announced in March 1988.

"...the audiences were going down, the programme was costing a vast amount of money, and he (Hill) was looking a little tired."

It was really only later when political correction might have proven a factor in the refusal for any of the archive channels to show Benny Hill on repeats.

Moving on at the start of this century we seemed to have a vast amount of late night entertainment to choose from, Men and Motors (now defunct) never tried to hide or make any secret of the type of audiences they were honing in and neither were Bravo (now defunct)

Times have changed and moved on, have a look through the SKY EPG on any given night and you'll rarely find anything that comes close to sexy or erotic outside of the 900 section which might explain why they have become such a tired format.

As for Love Thy Neighbour well that was just blatantly racist which came to an abrupt halt at the start of 1976 after a 4 year run. You most definitely will never see that series being repeated seeing as it's breaches just about every single current rule in the broadcasting regulations.

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - mrmann - 08-01-2015 22:07

33 Portland Place and other locations are being shown on channel 104's Sex Party Secrets now... Some bare ass so far, as well as swearing Surprised

One guy is mentioning how he shags a female judge at these parties, and how she loves anal and rimming...

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 09-01-2015 00:01

(08-01-2015 22:07 )mrmann Wrote: 33 Portland Place and other locations are being shown on channel 104's Sex Party Secrets now... Some bare ass so far, as well as swearing

One guy is mentioning how he shags a female judge at these parties, and how she loves anal and rimming...

Get her on the Ofcom board now!

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - M-L-L - 09-01-2015 00:58

The UK criminal justice system has been getting shafted up the arse by the Government for years - why should the individual judges be any different ?

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - munch1917 - 09-01-2015 19:20

Two episodes of 'Inside Spearmint Rhino' on the London Live regional freeview channel tonight, at 10pm and 10.30pm. Could be interesting.

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - slash - 12-01-2015 15:23

Sky Arts 1, 17.1.15 10:30 am (yes AM). Naked States!! If you haven't seen it, don't research it, just set your recorder, watch it, then come back and comment. Especially how Offcom has watered down the channels to the level that they are now. This is on a mainstream sky channel in the morning, you will not believe it lol. Enjoy!

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 12-01-2015 17:44

Not about nudity, but this does illustrate dual standards.

A babeshow makes a mistake, admits it, puts tighter controls in place, no members of the public complain, just a competitor, but Ofcom finds against them, fines them anyway, and threatens closure if repeated.

Meanwhile a show watched by millions of all ages, including impressionable youths, broadcasts what is held to be a grossly offensive racial slur that could encourage race hate on a public service broadcaster. Its a live show but there is no reason not to have a 5 minute safety delay. Likely outcome? Either find against the broadcaster and no further action, or accept promises to do better and mark the case "Resolved".

Each episode of BB attracts more complaints than babeshows in the entire past 10 years.

Quote:HUNDREDS of people have complained about the latest series of Celebrity Big Brother less than a week after it began, with former Coronation Street star Ken Morley the focus of viewers' anger.

Communications watchdog Ofcom said 233 people complained about the actor, who was given a formal warning by show bosses for using "unacceptable language" after he called US singer Alexander O'Neal a "negro".
Daily Record

and

Quote:Celebrity Big Brother ...Last year's series was the second most complained-about show of the year with 1,874 people contacting the watchdog about it.

The only programme with a worse record was the main Big Brother series which received 3,784 complaints, many of them centred on the behaviour of its eventual winner, Helen Wood, who was accused of bullying other contestants.
Daily Telegraph

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - mrmann - 14-01-2015 21:15

106 BBC 3 is showing Sun, Sex And Suspicious Parents now, with humping, uncensored bare asses, and soon to be more...

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - mrmann - 14-01-2015 21:28

Now, it's uncensored tits and brief full frontal (Lots of vag hair covering) of a woman getting naked in front of others in a bar, and getting ready to have her vag eaten out as the guy picks her up, and has his head in between her legs... All on TV before 10pm too. Head between legs position was blurred out. Tits aren't blurred though, and neither are asses.

Anyone done this in Magaluf yet? LOL

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - robby - 29-01-2015 20:50

Lost count of how many times I`ve seen this episode of The Two Ronnies shown on several different channels and recorded it because I knew Madeline Smith had a major nip slip in it. However, everytime, the channel showing it has either cut this scene or blurred the nipple out, with Gold being guilty of cutting the scene. However, not dettered I still record the episode just on the off chance the full version is shown. At last, Gold, a channel guilty of blurring out calenders in Fools and Horses and Porridge etc, show the whole scene. Yes and at 7:40AM. They`d have a baby if a model was out of her top for the same length of time.