+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+--- Forum: Former Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=237)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV Daytime (formerly Elite TV Daytime) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=266)
+----- Forum: Lucy-Anne Brooks (/forumdisplay.php?fid=420)
+----- Thread: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=285)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Goodfella3041 - 29-11-2014 23:48
I've never actually called Lucy Anne, but I have often called 'dayshow' girls who do the odd night time hours. Danielle, Gemma, Cara, etc...
And I can honestly say that I have never -- not once -- heard some guy talking to her about the weather, politics or their midlife crisis. That's just nonsense. And with all due respect to Snookered's power of persuasion, no one is going to talk a girl into getting undressed if she has no intention of doing so. No one. Not ever.
But this just highlights a very important distinction. It isn't always about liking or not liking the 'tease'. It is also about the different perspectives of callers and non-callers. And I'm not having a go -- I absolutely don't care if someone chooses to simply watch the show and never call. But it is only for non-callers that there appears to be "no difference at all" between a Lucy Anne day show and a Lucy Anne show after 10 pm. I'm sure there is a huge difference for guys who do call -- no more 'code' or innuendo, just good old fashioned phone sex.
Cara is a great counter-example. She gets praised to the high heavens for her "legendary" night shows, simply because she gets her tits out. But anyone who has called her knows that she is on the phones ripping people off by routinely cutting them off prematurely. As a frequent caller, I would take a dirty-talking babe who keeps her clothes on any day of the week and twice on Sundays over a mercenary rip-off merchant like Cara Brett.
So, no, you don't need to be grateful to those of us who call. But don't assume that just because the girl is not getting her tits out that we must be talking to her about the latest episode of X Factor.
We aren't.
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - The Silent Majority - 29-11-2014 23:54
(29-11-2014 23:12 )Joey 27 Wrote: of course they can call who they like but the fact is if viewers want to see a better show from a babe then the caller should treat it like a nightshow and not bang on about his midlife crisis or something? it baffles me when i hear that some callers don't even ask to see a babe's tits on a nightshow, but with all this "call stats" bullshit the callers could talk to the model about politics, the weather or where she got her handbag from all night and she gets to keep her job cos she is bringing in the calls
are freeloaders like me supposed to be grateful to all callers cos they pay their money? it's callers like snookered who im grateful too for getting a babe naked and putting on a good show, if i called the babes i'd only talk to her if she got her tits out cos guess what its a night show on a adult channel im not talking to my fucking mate, if more people got pissed off and hung up as soon as a model says she won't get her tits out then the likes of lucy wouldn't be doing them and we wouldn't need to moan on here
rammy says he used to call the babes, fuck knows what he talked to them about, as he keeps on saying a babe going topless on a nightshow is not important so he probably never asked, he probably said "i've spoken to you for 20 mins so your calls stats will be good goodbye louise"
So you are saying that, because she doesn't have her tits out, none of her callers are having hot phone sex.
And you do know, don't you, that girls who have their tits out get the 'time-wasters' as well.
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 30-11-2014 00:02
Yeah I admit I can't get em all naked.
If only eh
.I will resolutely defend non callers to the hilt much to the annoyance of the babes
.They are just as entitled to express opinions about the shows as I or any other callers. I don't have a problem with that.
Equally I have no problem with what Lucy said in her last post.
She put her cards on the table.
Fair enough.
I do hate waiting for timewasting callers to finish inane conversations on nightshows though. It is annoying
.Equally annoying are the ones who just make ridiculous and repeated noises down the phone or those that don't interact at all. Press hash and listen in for crying out loud
.And then there are babes who seem cut the calls off for no reason mid call
.Oops, going off at a tangent here.
Sorry. Twilight zone calling
.Back to Lucy Anne..........
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Phonebook - 30-11-2014 00:30
^ Agree with everything you've said mate.
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - stemmata - 02-12-2014 14:32
I have done nothing but say just how bad Lucy-Anne's performances are.
As long as there are gifted performers like Cara Brett in her tease hours I will continue to do so.
Compare the two, I dare all the naysayers to disagree.
Cara Brett a class "act".
S.
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - admiral decker - 02-12-2014 15:04
(29-11-2014 12:56 )Lucy-Anne Wrote: Quite frankly its not hard .. if you don't like it don't watch when you see me on the schedule.
S66 ask me to do the extended tease hours... I don't ask them.
Its plain and simple they offer me a fantastic wage to do after 10pm .. its my job and I am obviously not going to refuse.
Thank you Lucy Anne for your very sensible post. Unfortunately a lot of people in this forum haven't managed to grasp the fact that they aren't being forced to watch and continually tune in to things they don't like.
If S66 offer you a fantastic wage to appear after 10pm then it's obviously proving successful for them to have you on at that time. Understandably they want that success to continue and therefore to have you continue to appear after 10pm. As you say, it's plain and simple.
Some of those complaining are no doubt not really complaining about your appearances as such, but are moaning because your appearances are proving successful. That's the thing that truly annoys some of them.
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Bandwagon - 02-12-2014 17:09
(02-12-2014 15:04 )admiral decker Wrote: Some of those complaining are no doubt not really complaining about your appearances as such, but are moaning because your appearances are proving successful. That's the thing that truly annoys some of them.
I highly doubt that Admiral, more likely just people who want to see Lucy Anne's tits on a night show.
There's something positive for Lucy to take from that anyway.
That's how I see it, and since she's laid down her cards face-up I do believe it's case closed.
I say this because people can now make an educated decision on whether to watch/call based on the information Lucy has provided us with.
No need to sit waiting for something that's never going to happen which pisses people off - hence the snotty posts.
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - tapit54 - 03-12-2014 14:48
[attachment=63956]
http://www.realself.com/review/brussels-belgium-breast-lift-breast-uplift-london-brussels-dr-frank-plovier
Looks like someone is thinking about having some work done
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - RRROGER - 13-12-2014 11:57
(03-12-2014 14:48 )tapit54 Wrote: http://www.realself.com/review/brussels-belgium-breast-lift-breast-uplift-london-brussels-dr-frank-plovier
Looks like someone is thinking about having some work done
It's like a reverse anorexia epidemic....
...pretty girls with sexy bodies paying huge amounts of cash & suffering pain & discomfort for set of freak tits...
.....recently there's been Steph Wright, Delia Rose, Electra Morgan.
.......Maybe Lucy Ann feels disadvantaged 'cos she still looks normal, why not be different & stay natural?
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - darren73 - 13-12-2014 12:30
![[Image: B4m_Zj_U8_IQAAIj_JP.jpg]](http://s25.postimg.cc/71z05z0wf/B4m_Zj_U8_IQAAIj_JP.jpg)