Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 |
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Fernandez Esperenda - 03-01-2013 07:05 I'm saying both as i believe it is both biggest and most popular. Everybody will have their own opinion though and when it comes down to it, aslong as people enjoy what they choose to watch thats all that matters RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - RESPONSIBLE ADULT - 03-01-2013 12:33 What the fuck are you all arguing about? "This is better than that, that is better than this". When in truth, everything about the babechannels is fucking shite, and should be banished from our screens. Then you could all get to bed early, wank less, and save money instead of phoning airhead presenters who's major aim in life is to unscrew a bottle of fucking lipgloss without spilling it. RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - KerrAvon - 03-01-2013 13:11 (03-01-2013 07:05 )Fernandez Esperenda Wrote: I'm saying both as i believe it is both biggest and most popular. Everybody will have their own opinion though and when it comes down to it, aslong as people enjoy what they choose to watch thats all that matters In the case of the babechannels, I agree. If Babestation can reach the most viewers , especially as they are now the only major Freeview presence left (and therefore BS to many is all they know), why is it so unreasonable to assume they'll be the most popular? Because of the evidence of an insignificant forum poll? Not only was it a microscopic percentage for babechannels viewers & callers worldwide, it was also only voted on by a minute percentage of forum members. What I found interesting was certain reactions to the mere suggestion of Babestation being 'better' than RLC or Studio 66, really put out by the thought . It's almost a case of babechannel snobbery, the thought of Babestation being 'better' than our Elite-ist channel RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - bob roberts - 03-01-2013 14:30 (03-01-2013 12:33 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote: What the fuck are you all arguing about? "This is better than that, that is better than this". When in truth, everything about the babechannels is fucking shite, and should be banished from our screens. Then you could all get to bed early, wank less, and save money instead of phoning airhead presenters who's major aim in life is to unscrew a bottle of fucking lipgloss without spilling it. I agree with the beginning of your statement, and probably the middle, as well. From "phoning" onwards, tsk, tsk. Was that becoming of a Responsible Adult? Or who gives a fuck. RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - RESPONSIBLE ADULT - 03-01-2013 14:46 (03-01-2013 14:30 )bob roberts Wrote:(03-01-2013 12:33 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote: What the fuck are you all arguing about? "This is better than that, that is better than this". When in truth, everything about the babechannels is fucking shite, and should be banished from our screens. Then you could all get to bed early, wank less, and save money instead of phoning airhead presenters who's major aim in life is to unscrew a bottle of fucking lipgloss without spilling it. We all need to laugh Bob, And staying with this thread. I bet mine is FUCKING bigger than yours. RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - StanTheMan - 03-01-2013 17:59 (03-01-2013 12:33 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote: What the fuck are you all arguing about? "This is better than that, that is better than this". When in truth, everything about the babechannels is fucking shite, and should be banished from our screens. Then you could all get to bed early, wank less, and save money instead of phoning airhead presenters who's major aim in life is to unscrew a bottle of fucking lipgloss without spilling it. Made me laugh too! RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Fernandez Esperenda - 05-01-2013 03:01 There's one good reason why no other channel can top Babestation, girls like Camilla and georgie, Jada untouchable performance tonight from all the girls, especially Camilla who's shown everybody how it should be done! RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 05-01-2013 10:37 no channel can top babestation fernandez? according to the forum poll for channel of the year 2012 2 channels were better than babestation, rlc and studio66/elitetv. you keep saying youve no babestation bias but posts like youve made the past few days suggest otherwise especially the post in the great night on the babeshows thread this morning where you say you only watched babestation last night, so how can you say no channel can top babestation when you only watched babestation. you cant in my opinion also if the bs babes were so untouchable last night, why then are most of the posts for babe of the night for last night say its clare richards (who for me was babe of the night) then with other votes for nikki g on rlc and honey scott RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - thefred - 05-01-2013 11:08 (05-01-2013 10:37 )Rammyrascal Wrote: according to the forum poll for channel of the year 2012 2 channels were better than babestation, rlc and studio66/elitetv. You still don't or don't want to understand that this poll says nothing about the quality of a channel or which channel is 'best'. It's the opinion of a small percentage of all forum members. RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - munch1917 - 05-01-2013 11:51 (05-01-2013 11:08 )thefred Wrote:(05-01-2013 10:37 )Rammyrascal Wrote: according to the forum poll for channel of the year 2012 2 channels were better than babestation, rlc and studio66/elitetv. It doesn't say nothing. It says that more of those who voted preferred RLC or Studio66 over BS. That is a perfectly valid result. The number that voted may have been small, and that may make the result less trustworthy as an overall indicator, but the result stands nevertheless, more people who voted voted for those 2 channels than BS. I haven't done the maths, but even allowing for statistical inaccuracy, BS got thumped. Newspapers and tv companies and others constantly publish opinion poll results which are statistically far less meaningful than this, but they hide the fact by putting the participation numbers in very small print. |