Beth - Queen of Babestation (Nights) 2023 & 2024 - Chat & Discussion (Only) - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Babestation (/forumdisplay.php?fid=99) +---- Forum: BABESTATION TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +---- Thread: Beth - Queen of Babestation (Nights) 2023 & 2024 - Chat & Discussion (Only) (/showthread.php?tid=48445) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 |
RE: Beth - Chat & Discussion - M-L-L - 17-07-2015 21:55 They'd have been foolish to turn her down! RE: Beth - Chat & Discussion - Tractor boy - 17-07-2015 22:03 (17-07-2015 21:55 )M-L-L Wrote: They'd have been foolish to turn her down! I know I wouldn't RE: Beth - Chat & Discussion - bigglesworth - 17-07-2015 22:36 (17-07-2015 21:41 )elgar1uk Wrote: Beth obviously left Babestation on good enough terms to be allowed back. Yes, she's been welcomed back, which is good for Babestation as they badly need girls who are willing to appear on BSX. It also means she's got away with what was a very poor decision to join Sin TV. RE: Beth - Chat & Discussion - Gun33 - 17-07-2015 23:08 The Naughty New Zealander is back where she belongs and doing what she does best. RE: Beth - Chat & Discussion - De La Red - 17-07-2015 23:12 Welcome home Beth RE: Beth - Chat & Discussion - Regenerated - 18-07-2015 00:19 She is probably a babeshow's dream signing, because she's willing to go that extra mile for the company and for the viewers. Nightshows need more girls like Beth on the channels because of their commitment to different roles - BS days, BS nights, BS Xtreme. SIN TV could have been great - but it was mis-managed and ultimately it seems to have failed miserably. Bad decisions have consequences, and so far the channel looks to be feeling those consequences. We all make poor decisions occasionally and Beth did make a poor decision in going to SIN TV. She wasn't alone on that score though and from tonight's show so far she looks to have made up for that decision. Plenty of energy and the usual oozing sex appeal that we've come to know from this kinky Kiwi. SIN TV can just go now - it promised much and delivered zero - I hope that Beth and other girls who made that mistake are paid for their time there. In the meantime though it's good to see a babe like Beth able to come back to a show where she is comfortable and is still on very good terms with the producers. RE: Beth - Chat & Discussion - prince henry sinclair - 18-07-2015 00:51 (18-07-2015 00:19 )Regenerated Wrote: She wasn't alone on that score though She was pretty much alone. Because the other girls who joined went there when Sin TV was building up a big roster of well known babes and splashing the cash to get them. Beth joined when girls were leaving or in most cases had already left and were complaining about not having been paid. So her decision to join pretty much puts her in a bracket of her own and it's hard to understand why she thought it was a good idea. RE: Beth - Chat & Discussion - Regenerated - 18-07-2015 03:53 (18-07-2015 00:51 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote:(18-07-2015 00:19 )Regenerated Wrote: She wasn't alone on that score though No, I thought she wasn't alone because didn't Ella Jolie and Paige Turnah join and Anna Rose decide to stay after Tori Lee, Tiffany and Kerry had left? Warning signs were there that these other girls didn't apparently see either? RE: Beth - Chat & Discussion - barracuda - 18-07-2015 04:53 (18-07-2015 03:53 )Regenerated Wrote: didn't Ella Jolie and Paige Turnah join and Anna Rose decide to stay after Tori Lee, Tiffany and Kerry had left? No they didn't. You're chronology's confused. Ella Jolie and Paige Turnah left Sin TV BEFORE Tiffany left. Kerry left right at the very beginning, months before the problems started. And Tori Lee didn't see any warning signs, as they said she hadn't made her minutes and showed her the door. I'm not sure who Anna Rose is, but deciding to stay is NOT the same thing as joining. Joining means giving up work elsewhere (Babestation in Beth's case) and it's hard to see why that was a smart move. PS. Don't try to argue that Lacey saw warning signs either, because she was sacked for having a prima donna attitude and for poor timekeeping. RE: Beth - Chat & Discussion - marlowe - 18-07-2015 05:03 Beth's decision to join Sin TV was ridiculous, but I think it may have partly because she was on holiday in Mexico the month when the problems began and due to that she didn't fully realise what was going on. |