+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Babestation (/forumdisplay.php?fid=99)
+---- Forum: Babestation fanzone (/forumdisplay.php?fid=55)
+----- Forum: Paige Tyler (/forumdisplay.php?fid=119)
+----- Thread: Paige - Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=7449)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312
RE: Paige - Babestation Nights: Discussion Thread - samcooke - 16-08-2009 16:43
The problem, like i've said before, is that the producers' expectations of Paige, (unfortunately) are very different to our expectations as viewers. Would you really expect someone to turn down a lucrative job offer (especially in this climate) for the sake of us viewers?
RE: Paige - Babestation Nights: Discussion Thread - scotslion1985 - 16-08-2009 17:15
no wouldent expect any 1 to turn a well paid job down the way the world is rty now
RE: Paige - Babestation Nights: Discussion Thread - bytor - 16-08-2009 17:20
(16-08-2009 14:28 )dannyboy744 Wrote: I agree with Sooky, i'm quite new to all this so i'm not gonna trawl through this mammoth thread to read the to's and fro's of this argument, its pretty obvious what the jist is.
I suspect some of the members (i stress the word 'some')of this forum who "defend" Paige, (I add the inverted comma's as you may feel she has nothing to defend), are in some way trying to endear themselves to Paige herself, all the while denying themselves of their true opinions, which must be that you'd like to see her topless, i mean who wouldn't?!, She's a bombshell.
She's on a Televised sex-line that runs throughout the night, given the history of the show we can't be blamed for expecting it, it almost comes with the territory, more so, we are allowed the freedom of speech (even Lee Est, (although I fear having seen some of his posts that he's a law unto himself).*
Paige, please get your boobs out, not because you should, I just really want to see them 3/4 times a week, thanks.
Sooky, are those yours on your avatar, those are lovely!
* [ moderator edit - Former member lee est ]
It is not a question of defending Paige-she can and has done that herself. Some of us are Paige fans on here others are not. That is fair enough. It is not a question of some of us endearing ourselves to her (I stress the word 'some') it is simply that there seems to be an assumption by a few that they speak for all when saying paige and Lori should not be on nights. Paige is actually, excellent on the phone and is as good as anyone on any other show. ( I stress the word 'excellent').
You all do ring the girls like us good ol' fanboys on occasion don't you? Come on be truthful you don't sit at home thinking you are watching free porn shows do you?
RE: Paige - Babestation Nights: Discussion Thread - Stevie - 16-08-2009 17:22
God I wish someone would hit the delete button on this thread
RE: Paige - Babestation Nights: Discussion Thread - Sm© - 16-08-2009 17:23
When does Paige get back from her holiday? lol
RE: Paige - Babestation Nights: Discussion Thread - scotslion1985 - 16-08-2009 17:27
pass lol
RE: Paige - Babestation Nights: Discussion Thread - tsurugi - 16-08-2009 17:43
Here's hoping she met some rich geezer and never comesback
But not sure how happy he will be when she refuses to take her "hand bra" off .
RE: Paige - Babestation Nights: Discussion Thread - Josh - 16-08-2009 19:01
So what do guys normally do when a night only babe appears on the show that they do not like? I will not watch someone that I dont like. That is half an hour or so that I will never get back. Each station should have a variety of girls to please the diverse range of viewers and callers. The shows are adult phone sex chat at the end of the day and all the girls therefore are doing their jobs. The viewing spectacle is an added bonus. If there were no callers, there would be no shows.
Babestation has been on a slide since the end of party girls. Introducing the day girls has brought added viewers, callers, txts and more attention to the show. Watching the same girls night after night doing the same routine can get boring. Variety in performances and seeing some of my favourites (Camilla, Dionne, Megan, Rachel) on the show keeps me watching when there are better channels available to view. Bangbabes is on another level at the moment with no channels close to matching their content.
As far as the daygirls going topless and showing all, it does appear they are being held back. They seem more relaxed at changeovers as I have recorded Lori, Paige and Toya via the web stream. Toya seemed ready to go fully topless after her last appearance. Coincidence that she is no longer on nights?
I'm guessing its the freeloaders that feel aggrieved and defrauded that some of the day girls dont show their nipples. How many comments have been posted by dissatisfied callers? I cant think of any.
RE: Paige - Babestation Nights: Discussion Thread - scotslion1985 - 16-08-2009 19:11
I DONT CALL THE SHOW CUZ AM NOT CALLING A SHOW THAT £1.50 A MIN
RE: Paige - Babestation Nights: Discussion Thread - Sooky™ - 16-08-2009 19:23
Again - to simply play devils advocate:
As has been mentioned in the past, where is the evidence of any of the theories (and that is all they are, no matter how they are presented)?
Where is the proof of more calls, txts etc being generated by the introduction of daygirls to nights? And even if this is the case, what evidence is there that this addresses the obvious loss of nightgirls generated calls/txts that will undoubtedly happen by the increase of daygirls doing night shifts?
People state the fact that the daygirls have been doing lots of shifts, so therefore they are doing good at the job - not neccessarily so.
There has been a shortage of girls all round (be it on nights or days) due to illnesses, holidays etc....so the amount of shifts is an indication of nothing. This will only really be clear once the holiday season is over and they have full access to all their girls and a proper rotation policy can be introduced again.
As for always being on calls - again, no evidence to prove or disprove this point.
I also fail to see the relevency of whether or not someone is a "freeloader" - and how can anyone tell if someone is? Not everyone makes a big thing about phoning/txting in so nobody knows
But the ultimate thing is the visual spectacle is just as important as the call, no matter what people might like to think. The evidence of this? The simple fact that it is on tv at all. A numnber of people on here I am sure have read the likes of FHM or Loaded etc and seen the adverts at the back for phone services. There is no need for it to be televised if it is simply a phone service
The simple fact that it is televised is the phone services main selling point - and so just as important as anything else
And as for things being visible during changeovers on the live stream - this doesn't mean they are relaxed etc....simply that they have forgotten about another camera still being on them as they gather themselves and move off to do the next thing that is expected of them and allow the other girl to get on - they don't exactly have all day, so mistakes and accidents happen as they forget they're being broadcast
The simple point is - if amanda, camilla, dionne any of them came on the show and just sat there doing not much and showing not much people would (and do) complain about it and as is their right. But nobody is vehemently defending them from criticism
* again - not me having a go at paige - simply joining in with the debate