+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Bang Babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+----- Forum: Tease Me TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=32)
+----- Thread: Bang Babes Site (old merged threads) (/showthread.php?tid=2810)
RE: New Bang Babes Site - speedybert - 16-01-2009 13:53
crightonjohn Wrote:Shiny Helmet Wrote:southlondonphil Wrote:Selena's still on.Poor lass must be exxxhausted
Selena's still on.
Not entirely sure it's live as she's had the same underwear on for about 3 days now
RE: New Bang Babes Site - Bigjay20 - 16-01-2009 15:02
1. I very much doubt the "Live feed" is actually live.
2. There's no sound.
3. Buffering thing is a pain in the arse.
4. Have yet to see anybody topless never mind in the nak.
5. Things need to improve quick if they want viewers.
RE: New Bang Babes Site - $h!ny h3lm3t - 16-01-2009 18:41
speedybert Wrote:Not entirely sure it's live as she's had the same underwear on for about 3 days nowThank heavens it's not smell-a-vision then
RE: New Bang Babes Site - phallusfungus - 16-01-2009 19:32
speedybert Wrote:Not entirely sure it's live as she's had the same underwear on for about 3 days now
I'm sure they'll find somebody to buy it.
RE: New Bang Babes Site - dev1984 - 16-01-2009 21:15
maybe she brought them in bulk from a fadeing clothes company? lol
RE: New Bang Babes Site - cee - 17-01-2009 17:24
To me it seems very strange what Bangbabes have done with the new day-stream, I think Sexstation found out through trial and error that to make a success of such a venture you need to be somewhat generous with the performance of the models and furthermore pussy, and thus the calls will naturally flow...
This sitting around fully clothed, looking bored and waiting for a call will never work, same goes to Babeworld! A girl sitting on her ass staring at the cam looking like a "wet-weekend in Norwich" is not conducive to high call rates and never will be! Sexstation tried it for a while and it didn't work... eventually they learned that letting a girl get naked and play around, even when not on a call will actually lead to more calls in the long-run.
It's quite simple, who wants to talk to a girl who looks bored and is fully clothed? When you can go to another stream and talk to a naked one who actually looks like they are up for some fun?
If you look at the Sexstation streams volume of calls compared to the likes of Bangbabes and Babeworld, it is abundantly obvious to me who is doing it right, and, if after all, the point of these streams is to make money, surely the others should be following suit.
Look as much as I hate Cellcast for a number of reasons, at least they have the knowledge to know that this whole "unless you call, we're going lay here and do fuck all" nonsense really doesn't and never will work.
RE: New Bang Babes Site - punisher_2001 - 17-01-2009 19:26
cee Wrote:A girl sitting on her ass staring at the cam looking like a "wet-weekend in Norwich" is not conducive to high call rates and never will be!
ill have you know theres a great deal of fun to be had in norwich on a wet weekend thank you.
RE: New Bang Babes Site - TheWatcher - 17-01-2009 23:21
Who is this beautiful blonde girl on live site now?
RE: New Bang Babes Site - $h!ny h3lm3t - 17-01-2009 23:23
TheWatcher Wrote:Who is this beautiful blonde girl on live site now?That's Dionne.
Here's her thread:
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=441&page=1
RE: New Bang Babes Site - manchesterdud - 18-01-2009 01:16
the site layout looks good to be fair. but i cant really judge anything else as its all under sonstruction still
