+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Calling The Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=409)
+---- Thread: Do Babeshow Babe's Respect There Callers? (/showthread.php?tid=71833)
RE: Do Babeshow Babe's Respect There Callers? - hairbald - 22-11-2017 17:47
(22-11-2017 16:25 )Rake Wrote: ^ You get a 2:1 for writing your name and getting the spelling right...
She clearly doesn't know the field of privacy/copyright/ownership law very well - hence the mediocre degree.
To be in those areas (which dear god I spend too much of my life around including use of IT systems within court cases, DPA, etc, etc) its a very specialised and monumentally boring field where the shit lawyers end up
. She is best to remain ignorant of it to avoid one of the most stunningly tedious and soul destroying areas of the legal profession
Was slightly surprised she came out in support of the Revenge Porn law when a) its not applicable and b) toothless compared to copyright law which has an unlimited fine. Revenge Porn law is for prosecuting a sad sack former boyfriend.
Now if she's really switched on I would be advising the girls to go after their employers for failing to provide and adequately secure system. Interesting that one of them said they were contracted to Cams and therefore I assume that Cellcast/S66 are responsible for the platform. There is some liability right there!!
There is a DCMA US lawyer touting for business (Dannii Harwood is bigging him up as he is himself and threatening to close a particular tubesite). In reality he's just like a PPI firm who will right a letter and say thank you when per tube they take the videos down as a one off exercise. He will charge them everytime so I hope they can pay as there cam income will have dispappeared as they are all on strike
RE: Do Babeshow Babe's Respect There Callers? - hairbald - 22-11-2017 17:52
(22-11-2017 17:08 )Robot Devil Wrote: I do feel the need to address something I have been alerted to. Emma C has written a post on Twitter, saying that her main motivation in being so vehement in her anger for this situation is that she simply doesn't want anyone (friends & family, presumably) seeing her do whatever it is she does in her webcam sessions.
Which begs the obvious question: WHY do ANYTHING in your career that you wouldn't be happy with anyone knowing about? Why risk something becoming public knowledge? If you're a glamour model and you decide to ONLY go as far as topless modelling, why do open-leg for anyone? There's only one possible motivation... £.
But she's okay with a series of videos where a man wanks off in front of her. I'm struggling to see the red line on this one
http://www.ladyvoyeurs.com/models/emma-c.html
RE: Do Babeshow Babe's Respect There Callers? - ai1234 - 23-11-2017 00:50
Would actually pay to watch Emma C reporting this at the police station.
Obviously I wouldn't record it
RE: Do Babeshow Babe's Respect There Callers? - Asspocalypse - 23-11-2017 01:03
(22-11-2017 17:52 )hairbald Wrote:(22-11-2017 17:08 )Robot Devil Wrote: I do feel the need to address something I have been alerted to. Emma C has written a post on Twitter, saying that her main motivation in being so vehement in her anger for this situation is that she simply doesn't want anyone (friends & family, presumably) seeing her do whatever it is she does in her webcam sessions.
Which begs the obvious question: WHY do ANYTHING in your career that you wouldn't be happy with anyone knowing about? Why risk something becoming public knowledge? If you're a glamour model and you decide to ONLY go as far as topless modelling, why do open-leg for anyone? There's only one possible motivation... £.
But she's okay with a series of videos where a man wanks off in front of her. I'm struggling to see the red line on this one
http://www.ladyvoyeurs.com/models/emma-c.html
The sticky tweet about her custom vids/pics doesn't entierly help her argument, either.
RE: Do Babeshow Babe's Respect There Callers? - ShandyHand - 23-11-2017 18:16
Character comes through despite confining oneself to tweet length doesn't it.
...Hairbald's contender for post of the year above highlights the vast division between your average babe and articulate thinking potential punter. A chasm now externally stoked by industry intransigence and conceit.
His exchange with Emma C on twitter shows how a babe will brook no contention, how quickly a guy is consigned as a "weirdo" and hints at more on the generalised feelings that the babes behind these recent tweets have for their crowd...
Babe offers bravado filled 'bet they would never say that to our faces'; punter offers reasonable and polite counter that can't be shouted down or cursed at. Babe promptly shuts down exchange... After hairbald's posts this week does anyone actually believe he would not say what he had to say if he and Ms.C stood chest to ample busom?! He is certainly no ranting keyboard warrior. But Ms.C didn't want her vapid assumptions challagened - whilst posting about ours! Here's the thing though: It's not the average punter who is the relentless self-publicist is it; which individual puts more evidence of their personality and lives online? Whose assumptions of the individual are less likely to be generalised here?
And yet these babes would have it that we are the one's who lack knowledge and awareness of the other. I have seen the more thoughtful posters on here acknowledge that there may well be things that we don't comprehend in why the babes do what they do. I have never seen any reciprocal doubt of any kind from said babes. They think they have us down pat in a few trite phrases... We are not the ones who are showing we have closed our minds to the other.
It would seem that punters are one homogenious block to many that these idols; a totally known quantity. Ms.C not saying "all" presumably just allows for the traditional totally submissive payer and, the even more worthless ,whinging freeloader groups in her mind; the latter now augmented by the scourged quisling uploader ranks. I have yet to see any babe offer an acknowledgement of even a third category - let alone any further shades of grey - in their vision of their audience. That fact alone says how far beneath respect we are here.
RE: Do Babeshow Babe's Respect There Callers? - Rammyrascal - 23-11-2017 19:57
(23-11-2017 18:16 )ShandyHand Wrote: Character comes through despite confining oneself to tweet length doesn't it.
Hairbald's contender for post of the year above highlights the vast division between your average babe and articulate thinking potential punter. A chasm now externally stoked by industry intransigence and conceit.
His exchange with Emma C on twitter shows how a babe will brook no contention, how quickly a guy is consigned as a "weirdo" and hints at more on the generalised feelings that the babes behind these recent tweets have for their crowd...
Babe offers bravado filled 'bet they would never say that to our faces'; punter offers reasonable and polite counter that can't be shouted down or cursed at. Babe promptly shuts down exchange... After hairbald's posts this week does anyone actually believe he would not say what he had to say if he and Ms.C stood chest to ample busom?! He is certainly no ranting keyboard warrior. But Ms.C didn't want her vapid assumptions challagened - whilst posting about ours! Here's the thing though: It's not the average punter who is the relentless self-publicist is it; which individual puts more evidence of their personality and lives online? Whose assumptions of the individual are less likely to be generalised here?
And yet these babes would have it that we are the one's who lack knowledge and awareness of the other. I have seen the more thoughtful posters on here acknowledge that there may well be things that we don't comprehend in why the babes do what they do. I have never seen any reciprocal doubt of any kind from said babes. They think they have us down pat in a few trite phrases... We are not the ones who are showing we have closed our minds to the other.
It would seem that punters are one homogenious block to many that these idols; a totally known quantity. Ms.C not saying "all" presumably just allows for the traditional totally submissive payer and, the even more worthless ,whinging freeloader groups in her mind; the latter now augmented by the scourged quisling uploader ranks. I have yet to see any babe offer an acknowledgement of even a third category - let alone any further shades of grey - in their vision of their audience. That fact alone says how far beneath respect we are here.
Not all babes treat us with this lack of respect, as I’ve said earlier in this thread, there are babeshow babes out there who do respect their callers & us on the forum recent examples being Scarlett Jones on BS & Olivia Paige on s66. Ive met a few too including Mellie D, Dionne Mendez, Bex Shiner & Leigh Darby
Let’s not tar all babes with the same brush please. Yes highlight those who don’t respect callers & us on the forum, but also highlight those babeshow babes who do respect callers & us on forum.
RE: Do Babeshow Babe's Respect There Callers? - ai1234 - 23-11-2017 20:19
(23-11-2017 00:50 )ai1234 Wrote: Would actually pay to watch Emma C reporting this at the police station.
Obviously I wouldn't record it
(Following on from Hairbald)
Turns out you don't need to. Thankfully behind a paywall to stop friends seeing what she does.
https://www.wankitnow.com/videoentry/police-woman-bribes-you-by-stripping-naked-and-showing-off-her-huge-boobs-while-you-wank-off
Interestingly this does illustrate a similar problem faced by the girls where they have no control over content, nor right of removal should they have any regrets.
It's slightly ironic that for some girls Adultwork etc is actually an exit strategy to reduce public exposure on TV and to give them greater control and privacy. I'm a fan of Minnie who's long since departed from TV so AW is the only option. I've never seen her videos shared (nor would want to). I'm not sure what that says. But it probably means something.
RE: Do Babeshow Babe's Respect There Callers? - lovebabes56 - 23-11-2017 20:28
(23-11-2017 19:57 )Rammyrascal Wrote:I would guess Fern and Mikaela fall into that category of baes who respect their callers(23-11-2017 18:16 )ShandyHand Wrote: Character comes through despite confining oneself to tweet length doesn't it.
Hairbald's contender for post of the year above highlights the vast division between your average babe and articulate thinking potential punter. A chasm now externally stoked by industry intransigence and conceit.
His exchange with Emma C on twitter shows how a babe will brook no contention, how quickly a guy is consigned as a "weirdo" and hints at more on the generalised feelings that the babes behind these recent tweets have for their crowd...
Babe offers bravado filled 'bet they would never say that to our faces'; punter offers reasonable and polite counter that can't be shouted down or cursed at. Babe promptly shuts down exchange... After hairbald's posts this week does anyone actually believe he would not say what he had to say if he and Ms.C stood chest to ample busom?! He is certainly no ranting keyboard warrior. But Ms.C didn't want her vapid assumptions challagened - whilst posting about ours! Here's the thing though: It's not the average punter who is the relentless self-publicist is it; which individual puts more evidence of their personality and lives online? Whose assumptions of the individual are less likely to be generalised here?
And yet these babes would have it that we are the one's who lack knowledge and awareness of the other. I have seen the more thoughtful posters on here acknowledge that there may well be things that we don't comprehend in why the babes do what they do. I have never seen any reciprocal doubt of any kind from said babes. They think they have us down pat in a few trite phrases... We are not the ones who are showing we have closed our minds to the other.
It would seem that punters are one homogenious block to many that these idols; a totally known quantity. Ms.C not saying "all" presumably just allows for the traditional totally submissive payer and, the even more worthless ,whinging freeloader groups in her mind; the latter now augmented by the scourged quisling uploader ranks. I have yet to see any babe offer an acknowledgement of even a third category - let alone any further shades of grey - in their vision of their audience. That fact alone says how far beneath respect we are here.
Not all babes treat us with this lack of respect, as I’ve said earlier in this thread, there are babeshow babes out there who do respect their callers & us on the forum recent examples being Scarlett Jones on BS & Olivia Paige on s66. Ive met a few too including Mellie D, Dionne Mendez, Bex Shiner & Leigh Darby
Let’s not tar all babes with the same brush please. Yes highlight those who don’t respect callers & us on the forum, but also highlight those babeshow babes who do respect callers & us on forum.
RE: Do Babeshow Babe's Respect There Callers? - HEX!T - 23-11-2017 20:43
turns out the fucktard who sent the girls links to there videos did it because the guy that had the clips, refused to share with him.
he wasnt doing the girls any favors in fact the opposite. he couldnt get clips of the girls because he's a known creepy cunt, so he grassed 4-5 guys on spank-bang who had clips.
so fuck that guy for grassing paul up. paul may have been in the wrong for recording but hes still not as cunty as the prick that grassed him and others up.
the reason no 1 shares with you asshole is because you keep posting clips on tubesites and when guys complain and ask you to remove them you grass them up in the hopes you can then trade off there uploads?.
so yeah fuck that guy.
RE: Do Babeshow Babe's Respect There Callers? - ShandyHand - 23-11-2017 21:03
@Rammy - I know dude. If you read carefully you'll see there is qualification in my post.