(01-11-2022 01:15 )southsidestu Wrote:  It wasn't that long ago, when comparing her to Patel, I said that Braverman was more dumb but less evil, it seems that she is going above and beyond in making me eat my words.

When standing up in the House of Commons to make a statement on the petrol bomb attack against a migrant centre she starts with telling the house that the country faces "an invasion on our southern border" which not only has to be the most inflammatory rhetoric used to date but pretty abhorrent that she started with that and not a condemnation of the attack from the woman whose job it is to keep us safe.

She scrapped a scheme to put these migrants in hotels resulting in the number of occupants at the manston migration centre to rocket to 4,000 despite its capacity being 1,600, the centre was also designed as a triage unit with a max stay of 24 hours but many have been there for weeks. This has led to inhumane conditions with reports of cases of diphtheria and scabies.

The hotel scheme was put in place by Patel, who apparently hated it but did so because the alternative was illegal. According to Alex Wickham, a reporter for Bloomberg, two senior sources have called her actions a breach of the ministerial code and multiple other sources have declared that Braverman recieved legal advice that stopping the hotels policy was unlawful.

When Shapps took over as Home Sec he immediatley overturned the hotels band

ITV's Deputy Political editor Anushka Asthana has also had sources tell her a similar story and when Braverman didn't like the legal advice from Home Office lawyers she sought external advice, these sources also claim that that advice corroborated with HO lawyers and that the HO is now looking at a number of compensation claims (possibly 1000s) from detainees of Manston.

What's ironic is that she did this because she thought the hotel scheme was too expensive but if it comes out in an enquiry that she ignored the advice of lawyers that what she was doing to these migrants was illegal and that that illegal act led to them being left in disease ridden conditions, then those making compensation claims will be able to take the taxpayer to the fucking cleaners.

(01-11-2022 01:15 )southsidestu Wrote:  What's ironic is that she did this because she thought the hotel scheme was too expensive but if it comes out in an enquiry that she ignored the advice of lawyers that what she was doing to these migrants was illegal and that that illegal act led to them being left in disease ridden conditions, then those making compensation claims will be able to take the taxpayer to the fucking cleaners.

(01-11-2022 18:45 )skully Wrote:  ^
Well that's messed up. A woman that clearly hates another women's right to choose as the Minister for Woman, wow. What is wrong with some people, she has no right being in that role and by appointing her, Rishi has shown yet again that we need a fucking general election, two roles to two women who are terrible humans. I find it disturbing that some people think the Tories will fix anything, they are planning austerity part 2, so that added to everything else they've fucked up is not only making us a laughing stock, a poorer country and a less safe country, if they keep putting these horrible cunts in positions of power, we will be breaking various international laws on human rights and who knows what else. Just when you think it can't get any worse, the Tories stoop even lower, what a disgrace.

(02-11-2022 10:11 )Charlemagne Wrote:  Sunak is now attending the COP27 meeting next week in Egypt.