+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Delusional "fans" (/showthread.php?tid=88159)
RE: Delusional "fans" - Freeloaderthatsme - 09-08-2025 14:20
The member you refer to wears glasses,the rose tinted ones.
RE: Delusional "fans" - NobodyDoesItLikeBeth - 09-08-2025 15:10
Hahah! Amazing
RE: Delusional "fans" - ShandyHand - 09-08-2025 19:14
The babeshows are manipulation. Their intent is to cloud the user's proper perception over what is taking place over 'the airways'. It's always been this way. What's changed over the last 15 years is that the babes felt the need to lean ever more heavily into focusing on those guys that could be more easily convinced they (the user) were somehow special in their interactions. What was previously (and should've remained) a more healthily - and necessary - suspension of disbelief became, for too many, a warped sense of reality. Insiders realised that these users - perhaps those of a certain personality - were the bigger spenders. That pushing anything that convinced these guys they were a cut above the mob was good for business. (As a result, those users that were more aware of the limits of this famtasyland were pushed aside by the altered business model.) The sense of entitlement the big users feel these days - as referenced by recent posters here - comes as much from the idea they have a relationship with 'their' babe as from the spending itself.
Thesedays, the industry also encourages the idea of competition between users anyway, as it naturally pushes spending. Again, guys so inclined want to be seen as top dog to the babe in question, even if it's just in terms of spending.
(09-08-2025 13:38 )NobodyDoesItLikeBeth Wrote: ... Sure they are great blokes off Babestation, but the slating of camera angles, lighting, music and anything else along with some of the other messages stinks of entitlement. ...
I would add, we should perhaps guard against going too much the other way. It's not as if spending doesn't entitle the payer to much of ANYTHING. This too, is too much of a babe narrative for me. I don't like the idea that the shows are too 'lowly' to have ANY standards. Not a decent customer service ethic? Not a decent standard of 'production'? Not an efficient and protective website functionality? In truth, any spender deserves these basics on the way to trying to achieve his 'satisfaction' (!). (Mike Jagger was so right to use that word,! lol.) The key is always proportion. The user's sense of what he should get for his money should be REALISTIC, that's all. To me, thinking guys don't deserve that much is in itself a kind of thinking oneself above our fellow perverts! ('I'm too educated to be pulled into this crap' is a bit elitist, iow. We are all here aren't we? That says that we all want to look, lol!)
Finally, the whole dm thing plays into the same 'making guys feel special', of course. Plus, it pushes the convenient idea that satisfaction can only come via exclusivity of content and a lack of public transparency of what happens with each interaction. Nowadays, in large part, no user knows EXACTLY what the other fella gets for his spends. This suits this industry of somewhat suspect ethics down to the ground. This way, users have less to compare to in terms of what they should be satisfied re. their 'servicing'.
It's good to be entirely honest about this stuff I think - as this thread is helping with no doubt. Only then can we hope to understand what we are all suseptable to. All of us... to some extent. And, hopefully, then we can be on the way to more satisfactory transactions as a result.
RE: Delusional "fans" - Freeloaderthatsme - 09-08-2025 19:32
^Calling Babestation having somewhat suspect ethics is being extremely generous and kind.
RE: Delusional "fans" - NobodyDoesItLikeBeth - 30-09-2025 16:30
Got chatting to an old colleague a couple of days ago and it reminded me of this thread.
Many years back, he dated a babeshow presenter. (Before you ask I cannot remember her on-screen name, I just know her real name which I won't disclose for obvious reasons. This was around 2009-2012 for those who might want to hazard a guess)
Back then he used to talk about it a bit and recently the topic came up again. One thing that always stood out was how he said "all these guys, pay all this money to pretend to do the things I do for free"
Harsh, some may say, but ultimately true.
But this time when we chatted he was saying how he's glad she's no longer in the industry (they are still on speaking terms despite splitting) as he said the exposure for these girls has got so much bigger that more and more callers/fans seem to be exhibiting more possessive or gatekeeper like behaviours.
Just thought it was interesting!
RE: Delusional "fans" - Whynot - 30-09-2025 16:58
Some on the forum would praise the shows if it was a blow up sex doll on screen with a phone glued to its hand!
RE: Delusional "fans" - NobodyDoesItLikeBeth - 30-09-2025 17:01
(30-09-2025 16:58 )Whynot Wrote: Some on the forum would praise the shows if it was a blow up sex doll on screen with a phone glued to its hand!
Phenomenal comment
RE: Delusional "fans" - Tumble_Drier - 30-09-2025 17:43
(30-09-2025 16:58 )Whynot Wrote: Some on the forum would praise the shows if it was a blow up sex doll on screen with a phone glued to its hand!
On the rare occasions that I bother to tune in there have been times when it appeared that this is exactly what I was watching
RE: Delusional "fans" - Regenerated - 01-10-2025 23:37
Perhaps the "delusional fans" calling, or otherwise engaging with the shows, feel like they've nothing left to lose?
They feel lonely, they need something or someone to connect with, they believe (perhaps correctly) that they "can't take their money or possessions with them"...
It's just an alternative viewpoint - instead of labelling a vulnerable individual as delusioned. I mean - isn't everyone guilty occasionally of overspending on something, do we all not indulge in spending too much on things we enjoy and then feel shame afterwards for doing it?
Just offering an alternative thought process...
RE: Delusional "fans" - ukusagolf - 02-10-2025 00:11
^As someone who was an admitted delusional fan of the shows, I have wondered about the underlying sad motivations for some of the possessive behavior. Could be widowers, loners, or sufferers from E.D. They are entitled to happiness as much as anybody, so my gripes weren't with why or how much we might spend.
It was moreso with the effects. Since parasocial relationships are fostered, it would lead to very uncomfortable shows for me.
Whether that uncomfortable feeling was from my own guilt of spending a lot of money, or being upset as shows became more mundane remains to be seen
I can say, I've never taken offense to the term delusional fan, in fact it was a wake up call for me, which I am grateful for
