+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV (formerly Elite TV) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=255)
+----- Forum: STUDIO 66 TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=66)
+----- Thread: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? (/showthread.php?tid=60031)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? - scapaflow - 02-07-2014 22:54
(02-07-2014 21:55 )Fanboy83 Wrote: Course they will find a replacement but who? Is a girl going to walk in and make the same revenue as Caty?! I can tell you no one is. This change of scenery would be scary for 66. Channel is a drop and you loose your Main revenue girl.
She only did one good show with Danica as for as I can remember. Controversial, Could be wrong, but then again I was never a big fan. Didn't think Ashley Emma was that great either but apparently she's now sensational on Babestation, or so they tell me. Missing Tammy T as she was the business. Loving Hannah tonight.
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? - Rammyrascal - 02-07-2014 23:03
(02-07-2014 20:06 )Fanboy83 Wrote: A loss they can recover from? They just lost the face of their Brand!!! The girl on those banner!
That tweet is from babestation unleashed which is their web show and not their tv shows.
I really want to drink what Rammy is drinking!! I just can't see it rammy... Sorry
no need to apologise, that's your opinion and ive got mine which is different to yours. regarding the bs tweet about them looking for experienced glamour models isn't to do with s66 and is more to do with the work available to glamour models as the normal work they used to do which was the lads mags and page 3 is in drastic decline so lots of glamour models are looking for other work to do
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? - mr mystery - 02-07-2014 23:14
(02-07-2014 21:49 )sweetsugar007 Wrote:(02-07-2014 18:01 )Rammyrascal Wrote:(02-07-2014 13:53 )Joey 27 Wrote: rammy won't
^^^
Joey27 im not crushed your right. yes s66 losing caty is a big blow but one they can recover from.
yes s66 have lost 3 babes over recent weeks/months, Lilly Roma, Ashley Emma and now Caty but 3 new nightbabes have come in, Jade-Adele, Tasha Holz and Olivia Berzinc, also Jenna Hoskins is back on s66 and 3 new s66 day babes have gone bad and are doing regular tease shows/nightshows, Kara De La Hoyde, Emma C and Cara Brett
the babeshows are often a revolving door, as one babe leaves another comes in, so wouldn't surprise me if another babe comes in to replace caty
Pretty much agree with this. When new talent comes in it creates a buzz and its good for business if the recruitment is right. Caty been around forever,lily and Ashley were becoming stale and predictable. Its as good for them as it is for the channel and the punter.
It's only good for business if the new talents call volumes are constantly greater on a regular basis (not just when they first start) than the girls that have left and have been around forever ..
Maybe the girls that have been around for ever have been around so long because they are good at their job and make money for the channels they work for ? .
There is also the likelihood that these girls that have been around forever also create a buzz when they join another channel and take their fans with them to the other channel, which is good for business for the new channel they join .
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? - Liverred - 02-07-2014 23:33
It is worrying times for S66 but I still prefer it to Bs which has several top babes in Louise Porter, Leigh Darby, Paige Turnah, Tiffany Chambers but has a lack of sets and the camera work is lazy with few close ups! Plus, S66 still has Clare, Olivia, Jennifer & Sophia!
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? - Bandwagon - 03-07-2014 06:42
(02-07-2014 22:54 )scapaflow Wrote: Missing Tammy TAll day long mate, here, here.
Not enough of her type on ANY of the channels except Xpanded, who interestingly don't seem to struggle with finding great new babes.
That's the way to go imo.
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? - Tori Lee Addict - 03-07-2014 06:45
(02-07-2014 23:33 )Liverred Wrote: It is worrying times for S66 but I still prefer it to Bs which has several top babes in Louise Porter, Leigh Darby, Paige Turnah, Tiffany Chambers but has a lack of sets and the camera work is lazy with few close ups! Plus, S66 still has Clare, Olivia, Jennifer & Sophia!
Yeah basically my thoughts in a nutshell mate
It's not having a pop at the selections of babes on babestation to which there are many but their sets and camera work is defo lacking. Not to mention S66 have Lucy Summers, Yasmine James who are flying the flag high for it at the moment
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? - KerrAvon - 03-07-2014 07:42
(02-07-2014 21:49 )sweetsugar007 Wrote: Pretty much agree with this. When new talent comes in it creates a buzz and its good for business if the recruitment is right. Caty been around forever,lily and Ashley were becoming stale and predictable. Its as good for them as it is for the channel and the punter.
Don't think any of S66's recent recruits have or will create the buzz Caty will generate joining BS, so this channel will be the loser IMO. Of course babes can be replaced, but like for like with a babe like Caty is the real question. And if BS manage to get the best out of Alice, again big win for them.
Plus they'll be cheaper to call as well.
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? - lovebabes56 - 03-07-2014 08:05
(03-07-2014 06:45 )Tori Lee Addict Wrote:(02-07-2014 23:33 )Liverred Wrote: It is worrying times for S66 but I still prefer it to Bs which has several top babes in Louise Porter, Leigh Darby, Paige Turnah, Tiffany Chambers but has a lack of sets and the camera work is lazy with few close ups! Plus, S66 still has Clare, Olivia, Jennifer & Sophia!
Yeah basically my thoughts in a nutshell mate
U not adding Fernanda in that list?
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? - hairbald - 03-07-2014 10:02
I have been wandering whether BS have been smelling blood over the future of S66; Caty is a great capture and, whilst not the revenue powerhouse she once was, is very much the S66 figurehead. Also getting Alice is not something S66 could (or possibly wanted) to do and again it makes S66 look a little backwards.
I'm sure BS have a view on S66 business and you just wander whether bopth these moves are designed to reduce S66 market share and ultimately push them out.
If you add in Unleashed Webshows which are getting some decent "stars" now, compared to the S66 @home shows which are pricey and generally pretty tame, S66 look like they are under attack on a number of fronts.
Whilst S66 have gone to the American market is worth noting that BS have been working internationally for years too.
Just really think BS are trying to push S66 out of the market (in a completely fair way) by really pushing their product hard. Once S66 are gone the shrinking overall market has a bit of give in it for BS to maintain their profitability
I may of course me assigning more business savvy to BS than they actually have
Thoughts?
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse? - andyfletch25m - 03-07-2014 11:34
The only people mentioning caty cole being on babestation that I can see is babestation, she hasn't tweeted about it herself, she could in the next few hours but until she's on screen or she tweets it herself I'm having difficulty believing it. Although caty cole unleashed does sound mighty fine, I'm most probably wrong and she has moved its just I'm an idiot so we'll see.