RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - bytor - 21-01-2014 08:08
Babestation is not a public service, it is a business that is out to make money. I presume that everyone who moans about the same issues which have been going on for years and years contribute to its existence by spending money on calling, texting or listening in.
Therefore the power is ultimately with the service user. One remedy to get your problems dealt with is to stop giving them your money. They will either start to listen or go out of business. Either way problem solved. Obviously this strategy won't work if you are freeloader who watches but never contributes.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Doddle - 21-01-2014 08:45
Nice line-up last night, from what I saw of it
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - xJ4Kx - 21-01-2014 17:16
"I presume that everyone who moans about the same issues which have been going on for years and years"
I do agree slightly with you but the annoying thing is it's not as far as I am aware correct me if I am wrong I have been watching the channels for a long time I cannot remember Babestation being this bad I think this is there lowest point I can remember the days of when Paige Tyler and Amanda Rendall were on and Lori before she left to go to Elite and quite a few other girls, The channels never had any major problems like lighting, sets & channels not working, blurry-ness the list goes on apart from a couple of blips rarely the channels were fine everything was good. These issues are a recent thing of about a year to my keeping. I just want to say I have called Babestation quite a few times but I don't have a clue why people phone them now it can't be worth it when you can barley see the girl you may as well call one of those girls out the paper lol! It's strange how the tables have turned w/ Babestation they used to be the top channel for every reason! not any more in my opinion anyone agree?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Tractor boy - 21-01-2014 18:55
I think bs currently has the best selection of girls ever. Some real beauties but from a technical standpoint they have gone backwards
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - HannahsPet - 21-01-2014 19:14
i wouldnt go that far there are some great girls but no way near the class of girls they had 2008-11
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - SteveHG - 22-01-2014 00:41
(21-01-2014 19:14 )HannahsPet Wrote: i wouldnt go that far there are some great girls but no way near the class of girls they had 2008-11
Couldn't agree more HP.
When you think during a period of just a couple of years you had girls like Kandi Kay, Candy Sexton, Ella Jolie (still functioning then, see recent excellent posts from Dan Volatile), Dionne Mendez, Camilla and Paige Tyler on - I'm sure others will add their favourites I've missed! In addition existing BS girls such as Tiffany, Lolly and Georgie were arguably at their peak. With all due respect to the current crop I'd feel hard put to assemble a similar list now.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - REX MASTER - 22-01-2014 02:32
Why have Babestation on channel 906 Still got Masti Chat Music On? Babestation You Need to Change the Music across All the channels... This Background Music is Dull... Bring Back the Good Old Music, to Get us Viewers in the Mude....
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - circles_o_o_o - 22-01-2014 14:13
The old music is still available in no good record stores :
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Tractor boy - 22-01-2014 14:26
^^^^ Should'nt that be their greatest tits
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - phyxsius - 22-01-2014 17:41
There was a Brunette on a split screen with Savannah on Monday, im sure she said she was called Claire? Had a tattoo on the small of her back from what i could see but theres nothing about her on here at all...have i imagined her? Help please
|